Could someone direct me to a e-mail archive URL or web page that
describes the approval procedure for packages?
I understand there are three votes needed and a review of some kind.
Who is eligible to vote and who is eligible to review?
Thanks.
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Marcus G. Daniels wrote:
Could someone direct me to a e-mail archive URL or web page that
describes the approval procedure for packages?
Umm, I don't recall the exact link, but I can summarize it here.
I suppose this information should be part of
http://cygwin.com
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
The current maintainers are eligible to vote.
How does one go about generating interest for packages that the
maintainers would be unlikely to use themselves? E.g. packages
targeted for particular pre-existing scientific communities? Is
advocacy appropriate on
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Marcus G. Daniels wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
The current maintainers are eligible to vote.
How does one go about generating interest for packages that the
maintainers would be unlikely to use themselves? E.g. packages
targeted for particular pre-existing
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
It might help if you included some info about where a particularly obscure
package was leading (e.g., I have no idea what HDF5 is or does, but I may
have heard of the other package you intend to produce that requires it).
HDF5 is a library for fast and efficient storage
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 12:44:09PM -0600, Marcus G. Daniels wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
The current maintainers are eligible to vote.
How does one go about generating interest for packages that the
maintainers would be unlikely to use themselves? E.g. packages
targeted for particular
