paul.hermeneutic wrote:
> Is there any timeframe for unzip 6.0? I started down this path
> because unzip does not currently have multi-part support. I
> downloaded WinRAR, but I would prefer an open source solution if you
> know of any.
cygwin-1.7 already has unzip 6.0. It's just cygwin-1.5 that
Chuck:
My sincerest apologies. Clearly I made a mistake. Cygwin does have
the current version of zip.
Is there any timeframe for unzip 6.0? I started down this path
because unzip does not currently have multi-part support. I
downloaded WinRAR, but I would prefer an open source solution if you
paul.hermeneutic-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org wrote:
> It would seem that Cygwin is using a somewhat old version of Info-ZIP
> from which zip and unzip are created. The info-zip.org
>
>
> From the http://info-zip.org/ site, there is:
>
> """
> All known vulnerabilities are fixed in Z
It would seem that Cygwin is using a somewhat old version of Info-ZIP
from which zip and unzip are created. The info-zip.org
>From the http://info-zip.org/ site, there is:
"""
All known vulnerabilities are fixed in Zip 2.32.
"""
However, it appears that Cygwin is using version 3.0.
What is th