On Nov 25 16:46, V?clav Haisman wrote:
> [FreeBSD]
> struct sigaction {
> union {
> void(*__sa_handler)(int);
> void(*__sa_sigaction)(int, struct __siginfo *, void *);
> } __sigaction_u;/* signal handler */
> int sa
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 09:33:41AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Nov 25 16:46, V?clav Haisman wrote:
>> [FreeBSD]
>> struct sigaction {
>> union {
>> void(*__sa_handler)(int);
>> void(*__sa_sigaction)(int, struct __siginfo *, void *);
>>
On Nov 27 10:17, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> How about the alternative "Don't do that" approach? I think there are
> other parts of the header files which won't work with -std=c89. I've
> always been coding with the understanding that this is a GNU C environment.
Well, BSD and Linux are using th
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 14 11:52, Loh, Joe wrote:
>> [...]
>> We have converted all comments to use C-style /**/ and attached the
>> patch as a file instead.
>
> Your copyright assignment has arrived and got signed, so I took the
> opportunity to apply your patch. Thanks.
>
>
> Lookin
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 04:35:19PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Nov 27 10:17, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> How about the alternative "Don't do that" approach? I think there are
>> other parts of the header files which won't work with -std=c89. I've
>> always been coding with the understandi
On Nov 27 11:16, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 04:35:19PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Nov 27 10:17, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> How about the alternative "Don't do that" approach? I think there are
> >> other parts of the header files which won't work with -std=c8
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 05:24:14PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Nov 27 11:16, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 04:35:19PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >On Nov 27 10:17, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >> How about the alternative "Don't do that" approach? I think there
On Nov 27 11:41, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 05:24:14PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Nov 27 11:16, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 04:35:19PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> >On Nov 27 10:17, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> >> How about the
