On 10/11/2021 2:13 AM, Mark Geisert wrote:
It's just that after submitting the patch I realized that, if we really are
going to support both Cygwin archs (x86_64 and i686), there is still the issue
of different cygcb_t layouts between Cygwin versions being ignored.
Specifically, the
Ken Brown wrote:
On 10/9/2021 10:29 AM, Jon Turney wrote:
[...]
On 10/8/2021 5:52 AM, Takashi Yano wrote:
[...]
Thanks all for the comments; much appreciated. They'll be factored into v2 in one
form or another. I pronounced my original patch "bad" not because of any problem
with code
