This patch fixes the problem making pseudo-reloc too slow when there is
many pseudo-reloc entries in rdata section by deciding when not to call
Virtual{Query,Protect} to save overhead.
I tested this patch and time taken for pseudo-reloc reduced 1800ms to
16ms for 3682 entries.
Please review thi
Hi Jin-woo,
On Aug 26 10:59, Jin-woo Ye wrote:
> This patch fixes the problem making pseudo-reloc too slow when there
> is many pseudo-reloc entries in rdata section by deciding when not
> to call Virtual{Query,Protect} to save overhead.
> I tested this patch and time taken for pseudo-reloc reduce
On 2012-09-02 PM 7:27, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi Jin-woo,
On Aug 26 10:59, Jin-woo Ye wrote:
This patch fixes the problem making pseudo-reloc too slow when there
is many pseudo-reloc entries in rdata section by deciding when not
to call Virtual{Query,Protect} to save overhead.
I tested this pa
On 9/2/2012 1:51 PM, Jin-woo Ye wrote:
> Now it is clear that this patch would be needed other relevant projects
> such as mingw, mingw-w64. thanks for your effort on simplified one.
Yes, while it is not required that all of those systems stay exactly in
sync, there has been some effort in ensurin
On 9/3/2012 11:05, Charles Wilson wrote:
> On 9/2/2012 1:51 PM, Jin-woo Ye wrote:
>> Now it is clear that this patch would be needed other relevant projects
>> such as mingw, mingw-w64. thanks for your effort on simplified one.
>
> Yes, while it is not required that all of those systems stay exact
On Sep 3 17:34, JonY wrote:
> On 9/3/2012 11:05, Charles Wilson wrote:
> > On 9/2/2012 1:51 PM, Jin-woo Ye wrote:
> >> Now it is clear that this patch would be needed other relevant projects
> >> such as mingw, mingw-w64. thanks for your effort on simplified one.
> >
> > Yes, while it is not requ
On 9/3/2012 18:35, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Sep 3 17:34, JonY wrote:
>> On 9/3/2012 11:05, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>> On 9/2/2012 1:51 PM, Jin-woo Ye wrote:
Now it is clear that this patch would be needed other relevant projects
such as mingw, mingw-w64. thanks for your effort on simp
On Sep 3 19:02, JonY wrote:
> On 9/3/2012 18:35, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Sep 3 17:34, JonY wrote:
> >> On 9/3/2012 11:05, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >>> On 9/2/2012 1:51 PM, Jin-woo Ye wrote:
> Now it is clear that this patch would be needed other relevant projects
> such as mingw,
On 9/3/2012 19:24, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> It differs a lot from the original source, so you might contemplate
> to send a follow up mail to the mingw-w64 devel with the attached
> patch.
>
It looks like mingw-w64 is already using it all along according to Kai.
signature.asc
Description:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 09:46:45PM +0800, JonY wrote:
>On 9/3/2012 19:24, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> It differs a lot from the original source, so you might contemplate
>> to send a follow up mail to the mingw-w64 devel with the attached
>> patch.
>
>It looks like mingw-w64 is already using it all
On 9/5/2012 22:48, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 09:46:45PM +0800, JonY wrote:
>> On 9/3/2012 19:24, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> It differs a lot from the original source, so you might contemplate
>>> to send a follow up mail to the mingw-w64 devel with the attached
>>> patch.
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 10:59:23PM +0800, JonY wrote:
>On 9/5/2012 22:48, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 09:46:45PM +0800, JonY wrote:
>>> On 9/3/2012 19:24, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
It differs a lot from the original source, so you might contemplate
to send a follow
12 matches
Mail list logo
