RE: [patch] cursor

2002-06-08 Thread Harold Hunt
Jehan, > A static would do the job but, by personnally, I don't like static in a > function. It's easy to miss the "static" keyword when reading the code > which then make it hard to understand (or at least, I missed it. Several > times already I spent a few hours to try to understand why the cod

RE: [patch] cursor

2002-06-08 Thread Harold Hunt
Jehan, > However, I already got on a > couple occasions the pointer visible with no way to hide it. Was that with your modified server or with the Test57 server? I had to reimplement the showing/hiding logic in the Test57 server since I couldn't use your patch directly... so I need to know whic

Re: [patch] cursor

2002-06-08 Thread Jehan
Harold Hunt wrote: > As I thought, the documentation for WM_NCMOUSEMOVE does say that you are > supposed to return 0 if you process that message. However, they fail to > mention that things such as button highlighting are handled by > DefWindowProc, which you still need to call if you want to pre

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 57

2002-06-08 Thread Harold Hunt
below, then download from your closest mirror (http://cygwin.com/mirrors.html). Server binary, direct link: http://www.msu.edu/~huntharo/xwin/shadow/XWin-Test57.exe.bz2 (1078 KiB) Server source, direct link: http://www.msu.edu/~huntharo/xwin/shadow/xwin-20020608-2149.tar.bz2 (72 KiB) Changes: 1

RE: [patch] cursor

2002-06-08 Thread Harold Hunt
Jehan, > - Last, WM_NCMOUSEMOVE calls the default winproc. This should fix > the min/max/close button highlight problem on WinXP (Although I don't > have XP so I can't test) That's an excellent catch. I went back and read the Platform SDK docs about WM_NCMOUSEMOVE: http://msdn.microsoft.com

[patch] cursor

2002-06-08 Thread Jehan
Hi again Harold, Here is another patch. It's about the windows mouse cursor. - It maybe just a matter of preferences but for me, I prefer if the windows cursor is hidden in the client area of X if it isn't active. I personnally find it ugly to have two mouse cursors on top of each other :p

RE: Bug#40875: Acknowledgement (Most icons not displayed in 32 bit color mode using XDMCP from Cygwin/XFree86)

2002-06-08 Thread Harold Hunt
Waldo, Thanks for the reply. > I looked at your screenshots and it struck me that _some_ icons > did show up. > So If I had to make an educated guess I would say that it is > related to some > sort of alpha-channel problem. I would then assume that the icons in the > screenshots that show up do