RE: minimized XWin is killed

Yes (this morning I was not fast enough switching to xwin ;-)), in XWIN.log: ddxProcessArgument () - Initializing default screens winInitializeDefaultScreens () - w 1280 h 960 _XSERVTransmkdir: Owner of /tmp/.X11-unix should be set to root winDetectSupportedEngines () - Windows NT/2000 winDetect

RE: slow 256 color XWin on XP

/tmp/XWin.log (after start you have 19 rows, then remote Xsession contacts XWin): ddxProcessArgument () - Initializing default screens winInitializeDefaultScreens () - w 1280 h 960 _XSERVTransmkdir: Owner of /tmp/.X11-unix should be set to root winDetectSupportedEngines () - Windows NT/2000 winD

compiling netcat

Hello! I want to get netcat running in under cygwin. I guess you just have to compile it like in a normal UNIX enviorment. $ make linux make -e nc - --unix XFLAGS='-DLINUX' STATIC=-static make[1]: Entering directory `/home/install' cc -O -s -DLINUX -static -o nc netcat.c /cygdrive/d/DOC

RE: compiling netcat

ahh...damn! thx!! > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alexander Gottwald > Sent: Montag, 23. September 2002 13:56 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: compiling netcat > > > On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Mario Ohnewald

RE: slow 256 color XWin on XP

Norbert, Shooting from the hip here it sounds like you have a bunch of clients in your XWin startup script that, one-by-one, attempt to connect to the server, find that they don't support the only available visual, then disconnect from the server (which causes the server to reset since that wa

Re: compiling netcat

On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Mario Ohnewald wrote: > Hello! > I want to get netcat running in under cygwin. > I guess you just have to compile it like in a normal UNIX enviorment. wrong mailing list. Forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > $ make linux > make -e nc - --unix XFLAGS='-DLINUX' STATIC=-static

RE: slow 256 color XWin on XP

Harold, what I do from cygwin-terminal is: XWin -fullscreen -depth 8 & export DISPLAY=localhost:0.0 ssh -X solarisuser@solarisbox : solarisbox% /usr/dt/bin/Xsession While Xsession(dtwm) starts Xserver switches 5(?) times. I don't know the reason for that (and I'm not allowed to change anything

RE: slow 256 color XWin on XP

On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Norbert Schmidt wrote: > > Harold, > > what I do from cygwin-terminal is: > > XWin -fullscreen -depth 8 & > export DISPLAY=localhost:0.0 > ssh -X solarisuser@solarisbox > : > solarisbox% /usr/dt/bin/Xsession can you please try % xterm % /usr/dt/bin/Xsession This should

RH 7.3

Hi everyone, I have been monitoring this list for about a year now, and have used Cygwin/Xfree-86 to do remote administration of my linux machines. I am at a standstill as to what is new in RH Linux 7.3 that is preventing me from remotely connecting an X Session. If anyone has had experience se

Re: RH 7.3

Ben, More than likely your problem is that RedHat 7.3 ships with XDMCP disabled by default. To enable it, read this FAQ entry: http://xfree86.cygwin.com/docs/faq/cygwin-xfree-faq.html#q-mandrake-8.1-xdmcp Harold P.S. Do let us know if this solves your problem. Benjamin Simmons wrote: >Hi ev

RE: RH 7.3

i have this working on a number of machines running rh7.3. What is the error? -Original Message- From: Benjamin Simmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 11:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RH 7.3 Hi everyone, I have been monitoring this list for about a

Re: compiling netcat

Mario Ohnewald was recently quoted as saying... > > Hello! > I want to get netcat running in under cygwin. > I guess you just have to compile it like in a normal UNIX enviorment. No, you need to get netcat for NT. The unix C source isn't cygwin compatible, and there's really no need since there

Re: XFree 4.2.1 + fontconfig-2

On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 10:25:48 +0200, Alexander Gottwald wrote: > That is a windows problem. The XFree libraries are in fact versioned. > (libXaw.so.6.1 vs libXaw.so.7.0) Alexander, You've hit a sore spot here. The issue of Xft1 vs Xft2 was only the starting of a larger picture. Your right in

Re: XFree 4.2.1 + fontconfig-2

Alan Hourihane wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 10:25:48 +0200, Alexander Gottwald wrote: > > That is a windows problem. The XFree libraries are in fact versioned. > > (libXaw.so.6.1 vs libXaw.so.7.0) > > Alexander, > > You've hit a sore spot here. The issue of Xft1 vs Xft2 was only the > start

Re: XFree 4.2.1 + fontconfig-2

--- Alan Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 10:25:48 +0200, Alexander Gottwald wrote: > > That is a windows problem. The XFree libraries are in fact > versioned. > > (libXaw.so.6.1 vs libXaw.so.7.0) > Alexander, > > You've hit a sore spot here. The issue of Xft1 vs X

Re: XFree 4.2.1 + fontconfig-2

On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 03:03:54 -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote: > > --- Alan Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 10:25:48 +0200, Alexander Gottwald wrote: > > > That is a windows problem. The XFree libraries are in fact > > versioned. > > > (libXaw.so.6.1 vs libXaw.so.

Re: XFree 4.2.1 + fontconfig-2

--- Alexander Gottwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alan Hourihane wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 10:25:48 +0200, Alexander Gottwald wrote: > > > That is a windows problem. The XFree libraries are in fact > versioned. > > > (libXaw.so.6.1 vs libXaw.so.7.0) > > > > Alexander, > > > > You'v

Re: XFree 4.2.1 + fontconfig-2

--- Alan Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 03:03:54 -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote: > > > > --- Alan Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 10:25:48 +0200, Alexander Gottwald > wrote: > > > > That is a windows problem. The XFree libraries ar

You won't believe this!

Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Tuesday, September 24, 2002 at 06:05:44 --- ysgkg: http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/dir/?http://www.chicks-n-stuff.com/thapics/