On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 15:25 +, Scott Hussong wrote:
> After running rebaseall, I got startx to work on my new HP vista laptop.
> However, when I wake up from hibernate, any open xterms show "Not Responding".
>
> In my main cygwin window, where startx was executed, shows this:
>
> xterm: fat
On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 21:11 +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
> Dear xorg-x11-bin-dlls maintainer,
>
> When do you plan to fix the broken ImageMagic package by providing the
> three dll's which are not included anymore in the latest package?
> The ImageMagick maintainer may add this new compatibility pac
On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 13:31 -0700, James R. Phillips wrote:
> Hi,
>
> AFAICT there is no release announcement for 6.8.99.901-1, and there are
> several
> bug reports requiring manual intervention or downgrades. In fact I am
> experiencing lockups myself, and had to downgrade.
>
> This being the
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 23:55 +0200, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> Igor Peshansky wrote:
> > This mount used to be routinely added by the X postinstall script. IIRC,
> > this has been fixed in X so that such a mount is no longer required.
> > Searching the list archives may unearth the relevant thread
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 12:09 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 05:00:48PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Mar 2 15:49, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >>On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 10:45 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>>Our Cygwin/X maintainer s
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 12:09 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 05:00:48PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Mar 2 15:49, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >>On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 10:45 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>>Our Cygwin/X maintainer s
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 12:09 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 05:00:48PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Mar 2 15:49, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >>On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 10:45 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>>Our Cygwin/X maintainer s
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 10:45 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Our Cygwin/X maintainer seems to have disappeared so it looks like we,
> once again, are looking for volunteers to be the "go to person" for
> Cygwin/X. That would mean building new releases, handling problems in
> this mailing list, a
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 18:55 -0400, Rodrigo Medina wrote:
> Hi,
> I will refer to two issues that have been around from two years, they are
> more
> X11 problems than Cygwin/X problems, but as I understand you Cygwin/X people
> are close to the people that can fix them.
>
> 1- The xman program is
On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 11:02 +, Roger Levy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use Cygwin/X on my laptop all the time, and I often switch back and
> forth between my XGA laptop display and an SXGA external monitor. (I
> use startxwin.bat to start the X server.) What I find is that when I
> start xwin while
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 19:56 -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> On 10/27/05, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> > Yep, uploading myself to sourceware now.
> >
> > They'll be in-place in the next hour.
>
> Alan,
>
> I've taken the opportunity to evaluate the
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 12:04 -0500, Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > Certainly for the RC1 candidate it's going to be based off the
> > monolithic build, and still in /usr/X11R6.
>
>
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 17:02 -0500, Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > Seeing as X.Org has just released their 6.9/7.0 RC1 candidate release
> > I'm currently building it for a test releas
Seeing as X.Org has just released their 6.9/7.0 RC1 candidate release
I'm currently building it for a test release for Cygwin/X.
I'll announce it more formally when I've completed the packaging and
uploaded to the relevant sites.
If people can test this it'll ensure we can make the transition muc
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 11:32 -0400, Richard Campbell wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 08:14 -0700, Charles Li wrote:
> >
> >> I look through the setup and can not find cl, I have
> >> all the gcc installed. What else do I need?
> >
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 08:14 -0700, Charles Li wrote:
> I am trying to install FireFox on cygwinx.
>
> I got the following errors:
> +
> $ ./configure
> loading cache ./config.cache
> checking host system type... i686-pc-cygwin
> checking target system type... i686-pc-cy
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 12:40 -0500, Berndt, Jon S wrote:
> > Look in /usr/X11R6/bin/startxwin.sh and look for the line that says...
> >
> > XWin -multiwindow -clipboard -silent-dup-error &
> >
> > and change it to
> >
> > XWin -rootless -clipboard -silent-dup-error
> >
> > That will give you an
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 10:20 -0500, Berndt, Jon S wrote:
> > O.k. It sounds like tekplot's problem then on the way it's
> > dealing with window events.
> >
> > Alan.
>
> You might be on to something, though. I started up the IRIX window
> manager, 4Dwm. Most of my windows then had the standard MS
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 09:24 -0500, Berndt, Jon S wrote:
> > Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> > Which window manager are you using Jon ?
> >
> > Alan.
>
> I'm not sure. I am using pretty much the standard startup for Xwin. How
> can I find out which I'm
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 09:08 -0500, Berndt, Jon S wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> I am using Cygwin/Xfree:
>
> version number:11.0
> vendor string:The Cygwin/X Project
> vendor release number:60802000
>
> The operating system is MS Windows XP.
>
> I have found that when using the Tekplot ap
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 20:35 +0100, Colin Harrison wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Further to my 'picture tells a thousand words' series of patches:-
>
> Before my patch:-
> http://www.straightrunning.com/test/faulty_shaped_windows.png
>
> after:-
>
> http://www.straightrunning.com/test/corrected_shaped_window
I've just committed a couple of fixes which should cure the immediate
problems.
Let me know if something still doesn't work right.
Alan.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwi
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 00:46 -0400, Joe Krahn wrote:
> Has anyone gotten a full build to work recently? I got past the
> compsize.c changes in building the GL libs, but ran into similar
> problems in server GLX code.
>
> What is the relationship of Cygwin xc/ to the main Xorg xc/?
Joe,
I'm wor
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 13:33 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 22 12:09, ?yvind Harboe wrote:
> > I miss Alexander :-)
> >
> > Any word on a new cygwin-xfree maintainer?
>
> Unfortunately not. Is anybody willing to step up, perhaps somebody who
> already looked into the xfree sources more t
l try to contact support about this problem.
>
> Be sure I'll get you informed if I find a solution.
>
> Regards.
>
>
> Alan Hourihane a écrit :
>
> >Mathieu,
> >
> >I had a test version of XWin_GL on my homepage - available at
> >
> >h
Mathieu,
I had a test version of XWin_GL on my homepage - available at
http://www.fairlite.demon.co.uk/XWin_GL.exe
Give that a try, and see if it helps.
Alan.
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 13:31 +0200, Mathieu OUDART wrote:
> I've already tried to run Xwin with "-depth 8" and "-fullscreen" without
There's an old copy of some work I did a while back for XWin_GL.exe. You might
want
to try that. It's at http://www.fairlite.demon.co.uk/XWin_GL.exe.
I should clean up what I have and get it committed at some point.
Let me know if you get chance to try it and any results you get.
Alan.
On Fri,
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 04:58:45PM +0200, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Sebastian Haby wrote:
>
> > I started to try out Cygwin/X to remotely use a Solaris app, however, the
> > app uses 8bpp Pseudocolor visual which is only
> > supported in Cygwin/X when running the windows de
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 08:42:18PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 07:19:40PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 12:23:57PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Takuma Murakami has been contributing patches for a few months now. To
> make sub
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 07:19:40PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 12:23:57PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> >>Takuma Murakami has been contributing patches for a few months now. To
> >>make submitting clean patches easier for Takuma, and since we can now
> >>provide
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 12:23:57PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Takuma Murakami has been contributing patches for a few months now. To
> make submitting clean patches easier for Takuma, and since we can now
> provide this, I have added Takuma to the list of commiters for the xorg
> tree on
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 06:54:57PM +0100, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> > Apparently SciTech (Kendall Bennett) donated some code (a driver) for Mesa
> > that allows it to accept the OpenGL commands from the client and call
> >
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:11:41AM -0600, Brian Ford wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> > One note Harold on this
> >
> > You'll find that a lot of OpenGL drivers that are used on Windows are
> > seriously lagging behind in support for
One note Harold on this
You'll find that a lot of OpenGL drivers that are used on Windows are
seriously lagging behind in support for the hardware. That's because
a lot of vendors don't bother updating support for OpenGL directly
and are more interested in Direct3D.
Just run a native 'glinfo'
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:02:20PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
>
> > The following CVS commit, made by Thomas Dickey, has no indication that
> > Thomas was either a) not involved at all in the patch or b) that Thomas
> > found Ralf Habacker's patch an
JS,
Can you tell us about the application - is it available anywhere so I
can take a look too ?
Alan.
Can these announce messages, be left to the cygwin-announce-xfree... lists.
That's what they are there for, and refrain from cross posting this stuff.
Alan.
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 05:24:33PM +0100, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> The gv-3.5.8-1 package has been added to the Cygwin distribution.
>
>
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 11:35:20AM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> 6) Alternatives are being evaluated for hosting Cygwin/XFree86 code in
> CVS. Hosts that can provide CVS commit access for at least five
> Cygwin/XFree86 developers will be given priority.
Harold,
I thought you already had the
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 01:27:59PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Kensuke,
>
> Okay, I got it to build and run. It is very nice.
>
> What you think about renaming old '-rootless'to '-oldrootless' and
> calling the new '-win32rootless' just '-rootess'?
>
> -win32rootless is going to cause a l
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 09:41:11AM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> All developers,
>
> I am pulling code out of winmultiwindowwindow.c and putting it into
> separate files that deal with more specific tasks. This single file has
> grown to over 50 KiB, so it is time to break it apart to make i
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 05:32:54 -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> >Thor Johnson wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Greetings (and mucho thanks for the -norestart option for Xhost oddities)!
> >>
> >>I have a new boneheaded question:
> >>What is the difference between xv (as used in mpla
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 05:32:54 -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> >Thor Johnson wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Greetings (and mucho thanks for the -norestart option for Xhost oddities)!
> >>
> >>I have a new boneheaded question:
> >>What is the difference between xv (as used in mpla
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 03:09:20 +, Ed Llewellin wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have an application that sits on an SGI machine which I access via
> xfree86 on cygwin. When I try and open the application, I get a message
> telling me that "extension GLX" is missing. I have cygwin's OpenGL
> installe
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:36:16 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 02:17:45PM +0000, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 09:09:32 -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> >> To anyone who has made a donation: thanks!
> >>
> >> I w
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 09:09:32 -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> To anyone who has made a donation: thanks!
>
> I was able to get a new 120 GB 7200 RPM hard drive for my Linux computer
> this weekend, which was a nice upgrade from my constantly full 20 GB
> 5400 RPM drive. I have now setup a c
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 01:42:46 -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Alan,
>
> No recent patches were lost. I am talking about patches that I
> submitted after the 4.2.0 branch. After about two weeks you stopped
> committing them to both trees, even though I noted that they should be
> committed
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 11:02:37 -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Right, but I am being very pragmatic here. In the past it has been
> difficult to submit, and get Alan to commit, dual patches for both head
> and a branch. After about a month, I think Alan deletes the branch, so
> patches to i
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 10:24:48 -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Once I make an official release of the multi-monitor patch I can submit
> both the multi-window and multi-monitor patches.
As long as they are completely isolated. I'll need to review them first.
> There were also some cross-comp
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 04:13:49 +0100, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> > This is what David Dawes wrote about the forthcoming 4.3.0 release.
> >
> > Harold, Alex, and others. Can you take the time to really test the
> >
This is what David Dawes wrote about the forthcoming 4.3.0 release.
Harold, Alex, and others. Can you take the time to really test the
current CVS and get patches in now.
Thanks.
Alan.
- Forwarded message from David Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Here's a quick status update regarding th
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 07:58:07PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Alan,
>
> So would it make any sense at all to try to support it on Windows? To
> the best of my knowledge, you cannot read and write the 24 bit colors
> that are available.
If you can't get a read/write colormap from Windows,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 07:43:40PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Francisco,
>
> Do you know what a DirectColor visual is?
>
> Do you know why you would need a DirectColor visual?
>
> Do you know of any Windows-based graphics cards that actually support
> DirectColor?
>
>
> My understanding
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 11:27:43PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Alan,
>
> I doubt that this was the intended effect of using the default OS versions:
> ==
> make[1]: Entering directory `/home/harold/x-devel/build/std'
>
> Building on Cygwin
> (DefaultOSMajorVersion.DefaultOSMinorV
Done.
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 08:09:42 -0500, Harold L Hunt wrote:
> Alexander,
>
> Good catch!
>
> Alan - do you want to commit this directly?
>
> Harold
>
> Alexander Gottwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > the patch fixes some dependency problems with crosscompiling libdps.
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 11:26:35PM +0100, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> Alexander Gottwald wrote:
>
> > Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >
> > > > But some programs (xedit, viewres, xmessage) report an runtime error
> > > > Error: Unresolved inheritance operation
On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 09:49:15PM +0100, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> But some programs (xedit, viewres, xmessage) report an runtime error
> Error: Unresolved inheritance operation
I can confirm I get this too Alexander.
Alan.
On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 10:23:22PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 01:40:50AM +0000, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 09:49:15 +0100, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> >> But some programs (xedit, viewres, xmessage) report an runtim
On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 09:49:15 +0100, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> But some programs (xedit, viewres, xmessage) report an runtime error
> Error: Unresolved inheritance operation
, just tried the binaries on my w2k box and it gives...
"The application failed to initialize properly (0xc022
I'm about to commit a patch to the XFree86 CVS that uses the new relocation
code in cygwin 1.3.18. This allows us to create the last few libraries
as shared code.
Here's the patch if people would like to test first.
I've build tested the entire tree without problems, but not tested
cross compilin
Yup.
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 11:10:46AM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Alan,
>
> Are you going to commit this one directly?
>
> Harold
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alan Hourihane
> Sent: Wedn
It's broken.
We need to rebuild the X tree with
#define ExpandManNames YES
in cygwin.cf
Thanks for reporting this.
Alan.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 04:53:23PM -, Kris Thielemans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> why are the man page names abbreviated?
> e.g. instead of typeing 'man XCreateWindow',
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 11:51:16PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 11:49:31PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > Is there any reason why the above file still exists when
> > there is a -2.tar.bz2 version now ?
>
> In fact there's others too in the f
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 11:49:31PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> Is there any reason why the above file still exists when
> there is a -2.tar.bz2 version now ?
In fact there's others too in the font directories...
Alan.
Is there any reason why the above file still exists when
there is a -2.tar.bz2 version now ?
Alan.
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 11:01:37AM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Alan,
>
> Everytime I a build check I do something like the following:
>
> cd ../ [from foo/xc]
> cd build
> mkdir std
> cd std
> lndir ../../xc > /dev/null
> make CROSSCOMPILEDIR="/cygwin/bin" World > World.log 2>&1
>
>
> Thu
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 12:39:04PM +0200, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes, then they are probably needed, so just check for me and I'll make
> > the change.
>
> I've done a test run this mornin
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 08:45:00PM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote:
> Alan,
>
> Something is definitely borken:
>
> make[4]: Nothing to be done for `Makefiles'.
> make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/x-devel/build/cross/doc/man/GLU'
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/harold/x-devel/build/cross/doc
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 04:52:29PM +0200, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >
> > Can someone test a Cross Compile environment. I needed to comment
> > out the ComplexProgramTarget_1 rule which isn't needed when building
> >
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 05:19:53PM +0200, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> > When you've come to a decision on the patch, post a new one so I
> > can take a look and then commit it.
>
> There's a new one.
>
> The cygw
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 07:40:44 +0200, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> Alexander Gottwald wrote:
>
> > #if Concat(SharedLib,libname)
> > #define LibraryTargetName(libname) Concat3(lib,libname,.dll.a)
> > #else
> > #define LibraryTargetName(libname) Concat3(lib,libname,l.a)
> > #endif
> >
> > But
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:39:50PM +0200, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>
> > > But I don't know if this is either valid for imake or if it will
> > > break anything. And when you do a shared and a static version, the
> > > static version will most likely
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 03:06:51PM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>
> --- Alan Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 10:56:54PM +0200, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> > > Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> > >
> > > > final outcom
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 11:24:43PM +0200, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> > Nice job!
> >
> > For the libXft-1.dll we'll need a hack somewhere to make that
> > libXft.dll for backwards compatibility.
>
> in cygwin.cf is BuildXft1Li
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 10:56:54PM +0200, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>
> > final outcome:
> > --
> > /usr/X11R6/bin/cygXfoo.0.0.dll
> > /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfoo.0.0.dll.a
> > /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfoo.0.dll.a
> > /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfoo.dll.a
> > /usr/X11R6/lib/libXf
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 09:32:27 +0200, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>
> > How about a seperate package call X11-compat for this? Just seems
> > like a waste of space for people who don't care.
>
> Good idea
>
> > library name used on *nix: libXfoo.0.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 03:03:54 -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>
> --- Alan Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 10:25:48 +0200, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> > > That is a windows problem. The XFree libraries are in fact
> > versioned.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 10:25:48 +0200, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> That is a windows problem. The XFree libraries are in fact versioned.
> (libXaw.so.6.1 vs libXaw.so.7.0)
Alexander,
You've hit a sore spot here. The issue of Xft1 vs Xft2 was only the
starting of a larger picture.
Your right in
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 09:40:06AM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> > For this issue, I would revisit it, if someone claimed that there
> > are applications for Cygwin/XFree86 that relied on Xft1. I suspect
> > for the number of applications that will become available for
> > Cygwin/XFree86 they'll
>
> In regards to Xft1 and XFt2, Alan Hourihane and I noticed a problem with
> both of them being built and one DLL (version 1) wiping out the other DLL
> (version 2), so we said to hell with it and stopped building Xft1 and went
> full-on with Xft2. As to whether or not that
O.k. If the problem still exists, contact Keith Packard directly. It's
more than likely he missed the post too. But this code is his domain
and he's been banging on it a lot lately.
I'm sure Keith will respond.
Alan.
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 10:39:24AM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote:
> Alan,
>
> Hmm.
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 03:30:37PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 10:22:00AM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote:
> > Oh, I know that the XFree86 folks are doing some stupid things with respect
> > to expecting certain XFree86 utilities to already be installed at bui
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 10:22:00AM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote:
> Oh, I know that the XFree86 folks are doing some stupid things with respect
> to expecting certain XFree86 utilities to already be installed at build
> time. I bitched about this to the devel list at XFree86 and you know what?
> I did
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 06:37:26 -0400, Harold Hunt wrote:
> 1) Do a clean before rebuilding the server to ensure that the RENDER
> extension is compiled in and enabled. The RENDER extension is now
> reenabled. Unfortunately, the RENDER extension is the cause of the
> display problem with KDE 3.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 08:21:41AM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote:
> > I now see the XFree86 stuff probably was not designed to be using
> > WIN32 this
> > way. So, perhaps as far as XFree86 is concerned it *is*
> > spurious. (But the
> > branch on WIN32 *is* in Xos.h.)
> >
> > BTW *is* it possible to
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 09:10:30 -0400, Harold Hunt wrote:
> I've found a workaround, for now.
>
> It turns out that the RENDER extension is working find on Cygwin/XFree86,
> but the LAYER and/or RANDR extensions are causing problems when displaying
> icons with alpha channels. For now the solut
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 10:57:44PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> Yes, but the X infrastructure for this is excellent. I had it mostly
> working, but looking crap due to the decorations, and not choosing which
> windows to show on the taskbar terribly cluefully. Alan has various
> patches from me.
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 07:13:35AM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> Alan,
>
> I realize this point, but in light of recent debate, I wanted to submit an
> inquiry to be updated on the status of his project, and any future plans.
> This might be relevent to the list, as it was the whole purpose of
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 07:03:54AM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> --- Alan Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Huh ?
> >
> > libdps in the XFree86 CVS does not depend on "strict motif" at all,
> > in fact it has no dependencies on motif, lesstif o
e a server side DPS
> extension officially in the xfree distribution? I noticed from the cvs
> activity that the libraries are still being maintained...
>
> Cheers,
> Nicholas
> --- Alan Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ummm,
> >
> > Excuse
robably no one has attempted to do so, but I'm sure harold can
> > tell you what changes to your hosts.dep are necessary to attempt to
> > build
> > it, should you decide to embark on the journey to build support in to
> > your
> > xfree.
> >
> > In
ide to embark on the journey to build support in to your
> xfree.
>
> In fact this extension has been available for use since 4.0.3, IIRC.
>
> Cheers,
> Nicholas
> --- Alan Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 04:00:51 +0800, Zechy Won
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 04:00:51 +0800, Zechy Wong wrote:
> Hi, something happened when I tried to run texteroids.
> An X window was open, and when I ran texteroids a black box
> appeared briefly before disappearing. These are the messages I got:
>
> %% DPS Client Library Warning:
>Auto-laun
; make
> cd ../xclock
> make
>
>
> Any ideas why the straight-through build still fails?
>
>
> Harold
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alan Hourihane
> > Sent: Saturday, May
> make
> cd ../x11perf
> make
> cd ../xclock
> make
>
>
> Any ideas why the straight-through build still fails?
>
>
> Harold
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alan Hourihane
>
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:02:45PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alan Hourihane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:37 PM
>
> > > Will do.
> > >
> > Actually Rob, don't
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 06:28:11PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alan Hourihane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 5:44 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: makeNativeRgn
>
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:18:39AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alan Hourihane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:57 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Just a note - nativegdi engin
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 04:53:07PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> In the span functions,
> if pGc->CompositeClip has
> (nbox = REGION_NUM_RECTS (pRegion)) == 0, what does that indicate?
>
> Should we skip rendering the span? Grab 1 rect and hope we can read it?
>
> Something else?
>
That would
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 03:35:06PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> There's more that can be done, like moving the clipboard selection
> before the spans iteration, but the biggest improvement I've achieved so
> far is making native Rgn's for the FILLTILED routine. I'll make a patch
> for this once
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 12:42:23PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> Alan,
> this may be of use to you: It's the region optimisation I mentioned
> before. It seems a little faster to me, which indicates that some
> (most?) of the calls have mulitple clip regions.
>
Robert,
Thanks for the patch.
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
