RE: Cygwin GNOME 1.4 binary packages

2002-12-12 Thread Jean-Claude Gervais
ubject: Re: Cygwin GNOME 1.4 binary packages Ian Harcombe wrote: >Just to voice a quick vote of thanks to all involved in getting this >working. > >I am now happily running Gnome 1.4 (with all the extra bits n bobs >you've provided) under Cygwin on a Windows XP Professional la

Re: Cygwin GNOME 1.4 binary packages

2002-12-12 Thread David Fraser
Ian Harcombe wrote: Just to voice a quick vote of thanks to all involved in getting this working. I am now happily running Gnome 1.4 (with all the extra bits n bobs you've provided) under Cygwin on a Windows XP Professional laptop as my normal development environment at work. It is clean and res

Re: Cygwin GNOME 1.4 binary packages

2002-12-11 Thread Ian Harcombe
Just to voice a quick vote of thanks to all involved in getting this working. I am now happily running Gnome 1.4 (with all the extra bits n bobs you've provided) under Cygwin on a Windows XP Professional laptop as my normal development environment at work. It is clean and responsive, and now that

Re: Cygwin GNOME 1.4 binary packages

2002-12-09 Thread David Fraser
Hansom Young wrote: Hi, Now you can download some prebuilt packages from http://www.sourceforge.net/project/cygnome Hi Hansom, Thanks for doing this! The URL should be http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/cygnome (missing s) Currently only core libraries and a brunch of applications are ava

Re: Cygwin GNOME 1.4 binary packages

2002-12-04 Thread Hansom Young
and defects in this port). Still is there no one would like to help me? Sorry for the AD of operamail. Regards Hansom - Original Message - From: Lisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 20:57:52 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cygwin GNOME 1.4 binary packages &g

RE: Cygwin GNOME 1.4 binary packages

2002-11-25 Thread Ralf Habacker
> > > I am definitely interested in a cygwin GNOME binary, like the KDE binary > > which is available on sourceforge using the standard cygwin setup.exe (but > > I have not yet managed to get running properly on Win98) Where are the problems with win98 ? Ralf

Re: Cygwin GNOME 1.4 binary packages

2002-11-25 Thread David Fraser
Hansom Young wrote: - Original Message - From: Lisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 20:57:52 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cygwin GNOME 1.4 binary packages Hi Hansom, I am definitely interested in a cygwin GNOME binary, like the KDE binary wh

Re: Cygwin GNOME 1.4 binary packages

2002-11-25 Thread Hansom Young
- Original Message - From: Lisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 20:57:52 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cygwin GNOME 1.4 binary packages > Hi Hansom, > > I am definitely interested in a cygwin GNOME binary, like the KDE binary > which is availa

Re: Cygwin GNOME 1.4 binary packages

2002-11-16 Thread Huang.
Hansom Young wrote: > I think it doesn't. > > I'm a Chinese guy,too. I've noticed that the Chinese charactor couldn't show up properly. But I have no time to investigate this. > Yes, what i guess is right, that is because of cygwin1.dll's limited setlocale support. I re-compile gtk1 with -DX_LOCALE

Re: cygwin GNOME 1.4 binary packages

2002-11-16 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 10:07:13AM +0800, Huang. wrote: >And to cygwin-developers list, when will cygwin1.dll have full >setlocale and mbstowcs series support? I'm not sure why I always have to make this point but here goes: New features get added by people who care to add them. There is no cons

Re: Cygwin GNOME 1.4 binary packages

2002-11-16 Thread Hansom Young
Original Message - From: "Huang." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 10:07:13 +0800 To: Hansom Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Cygwin GNOME 1.4 binary packages > "Hansom Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>Hi, guys! >

Re: Cygwin GNOME 1.4 binary packages

2002-11-16 Thread Huang.
"Hansom Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, guys! I've build nearly all the GNOME 1.4 core packages on Cygwin, following the hints and patches gaven out by Steven O'Brien (http://homepage.ntlworld.com/steven.obrien2). Although I haven't time to maintain them, I think they might be useful. Bu

Re: Cygwin GNOME 1.4 binary packages

2002-11-16 Thread Lapo Luchini
I've build nearly all the GNOME 1.4 core packages on Cygwin, following the hints and patches gaven out by Steven O'Brien (http://homepage.ntlworld.com/steven.obrien2). Although I haven't time to maintain them, I think they might be useful. Actually a mantainer is *needed* to have new packages,

RE: Cygwin GNOME 1.4 binary packages

2002-11-16 Thread Jean-Claude Gervais
Howabout hosting the diffs on sourceforge.net? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hansom Young Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 10:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cygwin GNOME 1.4 binary packages Hi, guys! I've build nearly al

Cygwin GNOME 1.4 binary packages

2002-11-16 Thread Hansom Young
Hi, guys! I've build nearly all the GNOME 1.4 core packages on Cygwin, following the hints and patches gaven out by Steven O'Brien (http://homepage.ntlworld.com/steven.obrien2). Although I haven't time to maintain them, I think they might be useful. But the problem is that I can't find a place