Hi,
Belatedly found an error in Joe's icon_and_class.diff patch:-
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2005-09/msg00028.html
The system menu can be modified by the use of an .XWinrc file.
In Joe's winmultiwindowwindow.c file patch SetupSysMenu is called directly
instead of via the main WNDPROC
Joe Krahn jkrahn-at-nc.rr.com |Lists| wrote:
3) Decide if Win95/Me/NT/2000 need continued support.
Win 2000 - yes please...
Peter
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:
Hi,
Joe Krahn wrote:
3) Decide if Win95/Me/NT/2000 need continued support.
Cygwin has dropped Me, Microsoft 95/98 (support 'till Jun 2006) and NT (dead
now even if you pay).
Typical Microsoft, though...you have to read loads of pages of guff until
you can guess at the true story!
Anyone tried
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Joe Krahn wrote:
When I use the CVS defaults, only multi-window mode is built, so I
didn't see the #ifdef XWIN_MULTIWINDOW code compiled. Why is only one
version built? Is it rootless mode that gets excluded?
XWin has basicly 3 operation modes.
windowed (includes
Hi,
Another decision is what executables and dlls are built in distributions?
Do we provide:-
1) Support for GL and Mesa only by two builds (current situation), where GL
version is faster but less universally applicable?
2) Support for builds of both Xwin and Xming from the same source tree?
3)
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Colin Harrison wrote:
Hi,
Another decision is what executables and dlls are built in distributions?
Do we provide:-
About the current status:
1) Support for GL and Mesa only by two builds (current situation), where GL
version is faster but less universally
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 07:59:19AM +0100, Colin Harrison wrote:
Joe Krahn wrote:
3) Decide if Win95/Me/NT/2000 need continued support.
Cygwin has dropped Me, Microsoft 95/98 (support 'till Jun 2006) and NT
(dead now even if you pay).
I think you mean Microsoft has dropped the above. Cygwin
Colin Harrison wrote:
Hi,
Another decision is what executables and dlls are built in distributions?
Do we provide:-
1) Support for GL and Mesa only by two builds (current situation), where GL
version is faster but less universally applicable?
There should be one build with both renderers,
Peter Valdemar Morch wrote:
Joe Krahn jkrahn-at-nc.rr.com |Lists| wrote:
3) Decide if Win95/Me/NT/2000 need continued support.
Win 2000 - yes please...
OK, I was thinking this might be the one case where it may be needed for
a while. Can you build and/or test code changes?
Thanks, Joe
Hi,
All your diffs seem to work almost correctly (see below), but still testing.
In windialogs.c:-
Should SM_CXICONSM be SM_CXSMICON, SM_CYICONSM be SM_CYSMICON ?
Also had to remove the conditional on XWIN_MULTIWINDOW to get X icons
i.e.
--- my_windialogs.c 2005-09-03 22:36:08.0
Colin Harrison wrote:
Hi,
All your diffs seem to work almost correctly (see below), but still testing.
In windialogs.c:-
Should SM_CXICONSM be SM_CXSMICON, SM_CYICONSM be SM_CYSMICON ?
Also had to remove the conditional on XWIN_MULTIWINDOW to get X icons
It looks like that part of the code
Joe Krahn wrote:
When I use the CVS defaults, only multi-window mode is built, so I didn't
see the #ifdef XWIN_MULTIWINDOW code compiled. Why is only one version
built? Is it rootless mode that gets excluded?
Mystery to me..the code is loaded with many ifdef's, the use of which is
probably
Colin Harrison wrote:
Joe Krahn wrote:
When I use the CVS defaults, only multi-window mode is built, so I didn't
see the #ifdef XWIN_MULTIWINDOW code compiled. Why is only one version
built? Is it rootless mode that gets excluded?
Mystery to me..the code is loaded with many ifdef's, the use
I didn't get around to finishing ARGB type icons yet, but here's some
related patches for MultiWindow mode.
See icon_and_class.diff at http://joekrahn.homelinux.com/XWin/
The code was changed to use a single Window class for all windows. Icon
changes are sent to the Window instead of changing
14 matches
Mail list logo
