Re: bad installation ?

2005-03-11 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 01:28:05PM +, Owen Rees wrote: >--On 10 March 2005 20:14 + John Morrison (Cygwin) wrote: >>Basically adding your user (using the domain flag if appropriate) to >>the passwd and group files which is what the message attempts to help >>the user to do. It appears (judg

RE: bad installation ?

2005-03-11 Thread Owen Rees
--On 10 March 2005 20:14 + John Morrison (Cygwin) wrote: Basically adding your user (using the domain flag if appropriate) to the passwd and group files which is what the message attempts to help the user to do. It appears (judging from the number of times this question isn't now appearing on

RE: bad installation ?

2005-03-10 Thread Matthew Johnson
--- "John Morrison (Cygwin)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > Although the message is from base-files the reason > is due to installation. OK... > In my experience this only > occurs when installing for a domain user although > others have reported other reasons for it. 'Domain'?

RE: bad installation ?

2005-03-10 Thread John Morrison (Cygwin)
Hi Matthew, Although the message is from base-files the reason is due to installation. In my experience this only occurs when installing for a domain user although others have reported other reasons for it. For me, the message occurs because the base-passwd (which I also maintain) doesn't and (f

RE: bad installation ?

2005-03-10 Thread Matthew Johnson
Hi, John- Since I myself have no idea why it is outputting that message, no I cannot suggest a better message. And I notice that when I did a fresh installation of cygwin and cygwin/x on a brand new system yesterday, now I am getting that message too. Do _you_ have any idea why fresh installations

RE: bad installation ?

2005-03-10 Thread Morrison, John
As maintainer of the package which outputs that message I'm always glad to hear of ways to improve it. Can you suggest a better message? J. > -Original Message- > From: Matthew Johnson > > Well, Phil, I read what she posted, and I do NOT think > it tells "all Banibrata needs to know".

RE: bad installation ?

2005-03-09 Thread Matthew Johnson
Well, Phil, I read what she posted, and I do NOT think it tells "all Banibrata needs to know". The big unanswered question that is probably still bothering Banibrata is, "how on earth did the group get to be 'mkpasswd' in the first place?" I very much doubt that Banibrata set it to that. And I hav

RE: bad installation ?

2005-03-09 Thread Phil Betts
On Wednesday, February 23, 2005 6:23 PM, Banibrata Dutta wrote: > Could anybody explain the following behaviour or Cygwin and "startx" > in Cygwin... > > > > Your group is currently "mkpasswd". This indicates that > the /etc/passwd (and possibly /etc/group) files should be rebuilt. > See the man

Re: bad installation ?

2005-02-23 Thread Alexander Gottwald
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Banibrata Dutta wrote: > I had installed Cygwin as "Administrator" for this machine, and I am > able to successfully run X by doing cygwin terminal when I am logged > in as "Administrator", but when I am logged in as "dutta" the above > behaviour is what I see. Could someone p