Stacey,
Check the following email message for some history:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2003-04/msg00107.html
Duncan Cragg seems to have reported success using 'xset r off', but you
may want to read the rest of that thread for clarification. Hmm... from
my own comments I think I
Harold,
> Duncan Cragg seems to have reported success using 'xset r off', but you
> may want to read the rest of that thread for clarification. Hmm... from
> my own comments I think I mentioned that XF86MISC isn't compiled in, so
> it wouldn't seem that 'xset r off' could actually do anything.
> Duncan Cragg seems to have reported success using 'xset r off', but you
> may want to read the rest of that thread for clarification. Hmm... from
> my own comments I think I mentioned that XF86MISC isn't compiled in, so
> it wouldn't seem that 'xset r off' could actually do anything...
I too
Stacey,
Stacey Campbell wrote:
Harold,
Duncan Cragg seems to have reported success using 'xset r off', but you
may want to read the rest of that thread for clarification. Hmm... from
my own comments I think I mentioned that XF86MISC isn't compiled in, so
it wouldn't seem that 'xset r off' co
the rate is the number of repeats
per
second. If the rate or delay is not given, it will be set
to
the default value.
> -Original Message-
> From: Harold L Hunt II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 12:45 AM
> To: [EMAIL P
