- Forwarded message from William Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 07:33:52 -0500
Reply-To: William Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: William Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ISN] Hush offers novel twist on secure
At 6:18 AM -0700 6/13/00, Patrick Henry wrote:
Lucky Green spoke thusly:
Present-day Freedom simply isn't of any significant interest to many privacy
conscious customers. I suspect ZKS' sales figures are reflecting that fact.
Your point is well taken that ZKS' service does not meet the
Personally, I think the market for casual-grade untraceability is
limited. Which is not to say that the market for high-grade
untraceabily is any better. Most people don't think much about
security.
You'd think the one area where there would be a market for reasonably good
untraceability
Personally, I think they ought to be tracked down and dealt with more
directly. Cops who solicit illegalities need to be dealt with directly.
But that's just my opinion.
I think it should just be considered entrapment and made unusable in
court. That would end the problem right
Tim May wrote:
Hey, I have real problems figuring out how ZKS ever makes money by
collecting only $50, if they get even that, for customers for life.
It's $50 per year...or you're assuming customers cancel after the first year?
Don't rule out ZKS offering other services in the future, such
At 11:56 AM -0700 6/13/00, Michael Motyka wrote:
Fine, the intersection and union of our moral universes are equivalent.
How do you make it part of the legal system?
It's probably hopeless. I was just taking issue with your "only
morally acceptable" point.
One scenario might be to make a
At 09:23 6/13/2000 -0700, Tim May wrote:
If ZKS crashes and burns with an investment pool of several tens of
millions of dollars--someone told me they'd raised more than US$75M, but I
haven't looked closely--then "educated investors" will likely avoid this
type of market.
At CFP, ZKS told me
At 9:20 PM + 6/13/00, lcs Mixmaster Remailer wrote:
Tim May writes:
The fact that some fine people work for ZKS should cause us to give
them a pass on such important issues.
Of course he meant the opposite (no doubt a correction will have
appeared in the many hours it takes for remailed
At 6:14 PM -0400 6/13/00, Declan McCullagh wrote:
At 09:23 6/13/2000 -0700, Tim May wrote:
If ZKS crashes and burns with an investment pool of several tens of
millions of dollars--someone told me they'd raised more than
US$75M, but I haven't looked closely--then "educated investors"
will
At 4:58 PM + 6/13/00, Anonymous wrote:
Personally, I think the market for casual-grade untraceability is
limited. Which is not to say that the market for high-grade
untraceabily is any better. Most people don't think much about
security.
You'd think the one area where there would be
I have released an updated version of my 1998 Usenix Security Symposium paper
"Software Generation of Practically Strong Random Numbers", this version is
more than twice as long as the original and includes a lot more information
than there was room for originally. You can get it from
I've been reading the ZKS license agreement at their Web site (www.zks.net).
It sure looks like they reserve the right--and will likely use it
freely, given the boilerplate--to cancel a nym on essentially the
mere suspicion that some kind of "abuse" is involved. Abuse meaning:
complaints,
Can you recommend a replacement program for winkrypt to encrpt .jpg photos. I
use windows 98 and winkrypt doesn't work with 98'
13 matches
Mail list logo
