Re: Public Key Infrastructure: An Artifact...

2000-11-20 Thread Bram Cohen
? (Otherwise, SSL would not even come into the picture.) No, the attacker interferes with the very first connect to www.amazon.com, probably at the DNS level, and that's almost always done plaintext. -Bram Cohen

Re: Public Key Infrastructure: An Artifact...

2000-11-16 Thread Bram Cohen
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bram Cohen writes: In the vast majority of cases, preventing man in the middle attacks is a waste of time. In the sense that, in the vast majority of communications, there is no man in the middle attack being mounted? Yes. Couldn't

Re: Paranoid Encryption Standard (was Re: Rijndael Hitachi)

2000-10-20 Thread Bram Cohen
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Arnold G. Reinhold wrote: I read the Massey and Maurer paper (One can find it at http://www.isi.ee.ethz.ch/publications/isipap/umaure-mass-inspec-1993- 1.pdf ) and I have a couple of comments on it. This is just silly. There's nothing wrong with Rijndael. -Bram Cohen

Re: Chaumian cash redux

2000-09-23 Thread Bram Cohen
whether the key is okay or not. It makes it possible for a person to have one key for everything." Yeah, I know: It sounds a little far out. But then, I used to think e-cash sounded pretty far out too. Thank you Tom Wu for already inventing SRP so no other joker can patent it. -Bram Cohen

Re: Bill Joy suggests limits to freedom and research.

2000-03-15 Thread Bram Cohen
, or some nut will unleash a nanotech self-replicator or an engineered micro-organism to doom the human race. It would have to compete with these already highly competitive nanotech self-replicators we call 'bacteria'. -Bram Cohen

Re: New York teen-ager win $100,000 with encryption research (3/14/2000)

2000-03-15 Thread Bram Cohen
such an incredibly careless and political approach to science are no concern of theirs. -Bram Cohen