At 12:38 + 11/10/00, Ken Brown wrote:
But are there no rules in Florida allowing for a re-vote? If there
really are 19,000 spoiled papers from once county, that sounds "massive"
to me. It may not be fraud - the fools who designed the papers probably
thought they were doing right - but it has
At 17:52 -0800 11/9/00, Tim May wrote:
At 8:55 PM -0500 11/9/00, Declan McCullagh wrote:
I suggest that we find one county for each state that we believe to be
representative, let them vote, and then extrapolate from their results
and assign electors accordingly.
Or perhaps one household per
At 21:56 -0700 10/25/00, Nathan Saper wrote:
I don't think your Hitler example applies, because he could not prove
that the Jews were causing pain. In any case, my formulation of act
utilitarianism seems to suffer from those sorts of attacks less than
the normal formulation, and I have yet to
At 01:17 -0400 9/19/00, Jodi Hoffman wrote:
Kevin Elliott wrote:
Read the stupid website if you don't believe me www.nambla.de.
Here's a little something else I picked up from the same stupid website
(you know...the one you say only promotes sex between teenagers and
adults...)
My god! Did
At 12:43 -0400 9/19/00, Asymmetric wrote:
Actually asshole, there are plenty of anonymous remailers that DO
let you reply to the originator. In case you're just a bit wet
behind the ears yet and hadn't heard, a while back there was a big
problem with one of them when the government ordered
At 00:08 -0400 9/19/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Betweens teenagers and adults?! You must have been perusing a NAMBLA website
from another world.
I'm sorry but you seem to be the one in another world. Read the
stupid website if you don't believe me www.nambla.de.
--
Kevin "The Cubbie"
At 22:11 -1000 7/24/00, Reese wrote:
At 10:00 PM 24/07/00 -0700, Kevin Elliott wrote:
At 04:26 PM 24/07/00 -0700, Bill Stewart wrote:
US law currently forbids
US citizens from engaging militarily in their own foreign policy, the
way many Americans did during the Spanish Civil War (joining either
At 18:43 -1000 7/23/00, Reese wrote:
At 08:51 PM 23/07/00 -0700, Kevin Elliott wrote:
And membership in any or all of those organizations should positively
not be a crime. What's your point?
Lost, in the fireworks. That the Japanese gov't oppressing its citizenry
is NOT a cause celeb
At 00:04 -0700 7/24/00, Tim May wrote:
At 9:27 PM -0400 7/23/00, Meyer Wolfsheim wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Declan McCullagh wrote:
My point, though, is a simple one: What is good and what is bad
does not depend on majority vote. For instance, I'd say
At 18:44 -0700 7/21/00, Kristen Tsolis wrote:
The PSIA has been called an agency without a cause. The Agency was formed in
1952 to keep track of communist activity in Japan, but it seemingly has had
little utility and has been accused of keeping too close of a watch on
Japanese citizens. In 1997,
At 11:08 -1000 7/22/00, Reese wrote:
At 06:44 PM 21/07/00 -0700, Kristen Tsolis wrote:
snip of long, carefully read address on Aum Shinrikyo and PSIA
But that does not necessarily warrant the wide-scale surveillance of all Aum
members or the activities of the PSIA.
I don't want to sound
At 18:41 -1000 7/22/00, Reese wrote:
All, as in _ALL_ members, past and present, or just present? That
wasn't exactly clear, now that you say "*all*". Backing them into a
corner is exactly what should be done, if they refuse to renounce
the past actions and their association with the Aum
At 08:27 +0200 7/18/00, Tom Vogt wrote:
I maintain that the owners have given up their personal rights in
exchange for government-created corporate rights. as long as the
government is stable, that is usually a good deal.
Ahhh, but that, as they say, is not how the game is played. You
don't
try to remember to do that in the future.
At 1:31 AM -0400 7/12/00, dmolnar wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Kevin Elliott wrote:
least in the case of ZKS, I've never heard of Privada) are publicly
known, and considered strong by most, if not all, cryptographers.
The algorithms are publically
At 14:47 -0800 7/10/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
could somebody on cypherpunks please explain to me what the whole
point behind companies like Privada and ZKS really is?
I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume your just
ignorant and looking for an education, not obnoxious and
15 matches
Mail list logo
