At 10:54 09/19/2000 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>At 17:08 2000-09-18 -0400, you wrote:
>>That the list be changed so that unregistered email addresses cannot send
>>messages to it? This spam is getting ridiculous.
>
>I suppose you know why we don´t have that (the remailing issue). But I
>ki
(P.S. Lose the toad.com address. Get a clue. Or, since you appear to
be a luser, "loose the toad.com address.")
At 8:04 AM -0400 9/19/00, Asymmetric wrote:
>At 10:54 09/19/2000 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>At 17:08 2000-09-18 -0400, you wrote:
>>>That the list be changed so that unregister
At 10:54 AM +0200 9/19/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>At 17:08 2000-09-18 -0400, you wrote:
>>That the list be changed so that unregistered email addresses
>>cannot send messages to it? This spam is getting ridiculous.
>
>I suppose you know why we don´t have that (the remailing issue). But
>I ki
page I am talking about.
But, on a related note...
>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Message-Id:
>In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 13:36:52 -0700
>To: [
At 13:47 09/19/2000 -0700, Tim May wrote:
>(P.S. Lose the toad.com address. Get a clue. Or, since you appear to be a
>luser, "loose the toad.com address.")
You keep sending to it yourself. Mind explaining what the problem is?
>And how many anonymously-remailed messages to this list have ever,
essage-Id:
>>In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 13:36:52 -0700
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Hey kettle, this is
At 1:03 AM -0400 9/20/00, Asymmetric wrote:
>At 13:47 09/19/2000 -0700, Tim May wrote:
>>(P.S. Lose the toad.com address. Get a clue. Or, since you appear
>>to be a luser, "loose the toad.com address.")
>
>You keep sending to it yourself. Mind explaining what the problem is?
>
>>And how many ano
At 22:24 09/19/2000 -0700, Tim May wrote:
>At 1:03 AM -0400 9/20/00, Asymmetric wrote:
>>At 13:47 09/19/2000 -0700, Tim May wrote:
>>>(P.S. Lose the toad.com address. Get a clue. Or, since you appear to be
>>>a luser, "loose the toad.com address.")
>>
>>You keep sending to it yourself. Mind expl
At 02:21 09/20/2000 -0400, Riad S. Wahby wrote:
>You should read up on Type 1 and Type 2 remailers. Both involve
>encryption. In the case of Type 2 remailers, you only need to trust
>one in the chain that you use in order to be sure that your identity
>is securely hidden.
I do understand how
At 9:36 AM -0400 9/20/00, Asymmetric wrote:
>
>I do understand how both types work, however, the opportunity for
>subterfuge is always present. I was making a point that the assumed
>security of a remailer should not factor in if you intend to put
>yourself at risk. Assumptions are dangerous a
10 matches
Mail list logo
