At 07:39 PM 7/27/00 -0700, Tim May wrote:
>At 12:01 PM -0700 7/27/00, petro wrote:
>>Mr. May opined:
>>And, interestingly, the Mojo Nation stuff was _not_ done in E.
I believe the MN group found that Python offered the best available
tradeoff of rapid prototyping, platform independence (Python w
--
At 09:59 AM 7/27/2000 -0700, Tim May wrote:
> A kind of language for generating complex protocols was something
> Eric Hughes and I discussed at length before even holding the first
> meeting of what became the Cypherpunks group.
Such a language would not be very useful. We have a lot
Tim May writes:
> This is the key question, no pun intended. A kind of language for
> generating complex protocols was something Eric Hughes and I
> discussed at length before even holding the first meeting of what
> became the Cypherpunks group.
SDL (Specification and Description Language) soun
At 12:01 PM -0700 7/27/00, petro wrote:
>Mr. May opined:
>>
>
> There was a presentation at the Bay Area Cypherpunks meat
>meet about "E", a capabilities based language. Is that along the
>lines of what you are looking for?
>
> I can't find anything on the web, but searching for
This message below didn't get any discussion. Too bad. The issues
were and are important ones. We talked about them more in the 1992-3
period, with a later flurry in 1995 (I remember, because I can
picture myself in my new house, writing and reading such articles).
Comments below.
At 10:21
5 matches
Mail list logo
