More and more, a few public figures are speaking out. Some spoke
too soon and tried to shift their country "unilaterally against USA/
banks' interests" like Gadhafi/Qaddafi of Lybia and without a proper
unity with other nations/ other peoples.
The forces/ intentions/ powers involved, are too
https://thecryptosphere.com/2017/05/01/barrett-brown-released-from-prison/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/02/2017 05:39 PM, \0xDynamite wrote:
>>> But I like the sentiment. I think the problem is more than
>>> the State. It's the pathetic infrastructure that would be an
>>> eyesore for centuries.
>>
>> Bear in mind that the "State" is a model of
On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 01:41:16PM +, \0xDynamite wrote:
> >> How does anarchy provide the high-level of organization needed to
> >> produce a car?
> >
> > Humans have this funny habit of organising themselves, through
> > conversation into action, to meet actual needs or desires. "Social
> >
On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 03:50:51PM -0500, \0xDynamite wrote:
> That's some good bit o' history. I was really referring to the level
> of existing order needed to create *more* levels of order.
E.g "create tech to fly to Mars" and stuff?
> I don't
> think it's possible to argue with that.
On Tue, 2 May 2017 16:39:09 -0500
"\\0xDynamite" wrote:
> The solution, then, is a META-state. A system of order bigger and
> better than the State.
Yes. How could we have missed such an obvious solution.
What's needed is a META-STATE. with JESUS
From: \0xDynamite
>That's some good bit o' history.
It was you who asked the question "Without a State, would we have electronics?
Radio?"
I proceeded to answer that question, and others. You asked the history
question, I thought the answer was obviousl.
>
On 05/02/2017 02:31 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
> walking it back to conditions comparable to the 1950s is humanity's
> Great Mission Objective.
Dog forbid!
Rr
On 05/02/2017 01:57 AM, John Newman wrote:
>
>
>> On May 1, 2017, at 8:16 PM, Mirimir wrote:
>> You can check your CPUs for vPro etc at https://ark.intel.com/#@Processors
>>
>> Intel's mitigation guide:
>>
Even better, just listen to this:
Cyberpunkers, illegal mix, vol 1:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FoR-3xuZNw8
There's, like, 6 more volumes.
\x
>> But I like the sentiment. I think the problem is more than the
>> State. It's the pathetic infrastructure that would be an eyesore
>> for centuries.
>
> Bear in mind that the "State" is a model of governance, not a synonym
> for governance. It is a failed model, as witness the Anthropocene
>
That's some good bit o' history. I was really referring to the level
of existing order needed to create *more* levels of order. I don't
think it's possible to argue with that. It's like arguing what's the
use of the Self? BECAUSE without it you'd turn into little slime
molds looking for food.
From: \0xDynamite
>Without a State, would we have electronics? Radio?
That's a question which displays a lack of knowledge of technical history.
Radio transmission was known as a consequence of Maxwell's equations, Maxwell's
equations . Heinrich Hertz
HAHAHA! Federally-connected legal wonkblog!
>
> Department of Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly recently told an
> audience that terrorism is “as threatening today” as it was on 9/11.
> As evidence, he used the oft-repeated statistic that the FBI has
> active terrorism investigations in all
> On May 1, 2017, at 8:16 PM, Mirimir wrote:
>
>> On 05/01/2017 11:21 AM, Ryan Carboni wrote:
>> https://semiaccurate.com/2017/05/01/remote-security-exploit-2008-intel-platforms/
>>
>>
>>> First a little bit of background. SemiAccurate has known about this
>>
On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 04:35:56PM +1000, Charles Mollison wrote:
> Full marks to John Wilson!
>
> Such a gathering would achieve much of what Zenaan is asking for.
So you say. But do you address what is said?
> The FNR Draft Constitution was conceived over ten years by hundreds
> of ordinary
On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 02:35:52PM +1000, John Wilson wrote:
> Dear Zenaan,
>
> " that's what we expect from the government" is a statement that can't go
> unnoticed..people are misled into think parliaments are
> government.parliaments are NOT governmentcourts are
>
Dear John, I don't think the timings quite right - perhaps 2018 I'd
say. Also, it would be (just at this point in time) merely a reaction
to ARM and Charles Mollison - NOT the right approach (that's what we
expect from the government).
We can do better, and besides, in this day and age, we can
The eternal vigilance we must display when we have relatively solid
foundations, as we do in Australia notwithstanding the mostly self
serving corrup politicians and other power brokers, is notable.
At least once a year, those behind the scenes to to fuck us over in
Australia, with deceptive and
I cannot speak much to the "Australian Human Rights Centre", but
they're Aussies, so they're probably not all bad, and they're from a
University, so they're probably a bit bookish, which wouldn't bee too
foreign to most folks these days ...
What stands out is that "politically correct" public
20 matches
Mail list logo