> (apparently) senior officials
>>> getting rid of [...] persons out
>>> of 35,000 is highly unlikely to have any significant effect
AP vs Top Men... who wins?
AP vs X ... who wins?
So the journalists who relayed leaks lack competence to evaluate the
credibility of claims by (apparently) senior officials that there is an
investigation into a President, which must presumably resemble a typical
investigation, which must lead to a prosecution, which would involve arguing
befo
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 11:28, Ryan Carboni<33...@protonmail.com>
wrote:>According to this, the number of people the FBI employs is about 35,000
>35,000 is a lot of people. What makes you think 35,000 mindlessly obedient
>persons make any relevant decision?
>According to this, the number of people the FBI employs is about 35,000.
"The government does not commit those sorts of crimes, not on our watch. It was
true before, but it was for a very good reason that society doesn't understand
and isn't capable of it. None of the people who ordered it were
On 7/5/19 3:18 AM, jim bell wrote:
[...]
> She was obviously guilty of violation of the Federal Records Act, which
> required her to arrange to have the contents of her private server
> backed up, essentially continuously, with the government, to the
> National Archives. She did not do that.
On Wednesday, July 3, 2019, 02:17:26 AM PDT, Ryan Carboni
<33...@protonmail.com> wrote:
>What does it mean to participate in society? What does it mean to passively
>participate? What happens when you deny a person to even passively
>participate? If a person for example, anonymously goes
