11:11:31AM +0000, other.arkitech wrote:
>
> > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> > On Saturday, June 6, 2020 2:07 AM, Zenaan Harkness z...@freedbms.net wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 11:28:30PM +, other.arkitech wrote:
> > >
> > &g
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, June 8, 2020 5:50 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> > I would not call it premine, just mined, the network is running and mining.
> > Premine implies that the genesis started with allocations
>
> That's one form.
>
> Another
I've found this resource about cypherpunks:
https://github.com/jooray/cypherpunk-research
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, June 6, 2020 3:40 PM, Karl wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2020, 11:34 AM other.arkitech
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, June 7, 2020 1:22 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> > > > I am try to honestly persuade you guys to try USPS if you're really
> > > > interested in it as a next-gen cryptocurrency system.
> > > > My interest is to gain users
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, June 7, 2020 1:15 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> Govts and GovCorp adversaries sitting on big quantity of IPv4/8's
> and /n's scattered worldwide, and limitless IPv6/n's.
> How going to audit all those Sybils?
IP4 allocat
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, June 7, 2020 12:14 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> Some often good people often have way of getting
> themselves trapped up in things.
> Coinbase has always been garbage, trolls upon the ecosystem,
> fakeass corporates hard
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, June 6, 2020 3:24 PM, Karl wrote:
> I missed some of your expressions.
>
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2020, 10:59 AM other.arkitech
> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, June 6, 2020 2:00 PM, Karl wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2020, 9:48 AM other.arkitech
> wrote:
>
>> Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
>>
>&g
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, June 6, 2020 1:28 PM, Karl wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2020, 8:14 AM other.arkitech
> wrote:
>
>> Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
>>
>&g
> Provided a world distribution of people that can be evil/honest of 80%-20%,
> the likeliness of an evil network overtaking the honest one is lower than the
> opposite.
errata: Provided a world distribution of people that can be evil/honest of
20%-80%
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, June 6, 2020 12:00 PM, Karl wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2020, 7:49 AM other.arkitech
> wrote:
>
>> Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
>>
>&g
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, June 6, 2020 11:38 AM, Karl wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2020, 7:18 AM other.arkitech
> wrote:
>
>> Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
>>
>&g
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, June 6, 2020 10:17 AM, Karl wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2020, 7:29 PM other.arkitech
> wrote:
>
>>> so your system doesn't have a bloated chain, which is nice.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, June 5, 2020 10:26 PM, Punk-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Jun 2020 20:02:14 +
> "other.arkitech" other.arkit...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> > I feel a bit sad, bcs nobody cares about USPS, even though it looks like
>
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, May 28, 2020 1:18 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
> > There is a good bounty if you can break it. That should be enough to think
> > the suite is being challenged all the time, without success so far.
>
> That's naïve.
>
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, May 27, 2020 10:43 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:19:26AM +0000, other.arkitech wrote:
>
> > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
> > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, May 27, 2020 7:03 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:05:01PM -0300, Punk-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 26 May 2020 22:27:57 +
> > "other.arkitech" other.a
> K
> >
> > Nah, one thing is criticism and other is a guy calling you
> > repeatedly a scammer when you are showing up your work. That is not
> > precisely good taste.
> > the source code is GPL, but I haven't published it yet, that's all.
> &
gt; People aren't censored here. That means random criticism comes through. Do
>> you need help setting up filters?
>> K
>>
>> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:06 AM other.arkitech
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear readers,
>>> My intention is to respond to
it yet, that's all.
Is in the roadmap. For reasons it will be released before 1.0
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:06 AM other.arkitech
> wrote:
>
>> Dear readers,
>> My intention is to respond to a public attack against my honesty and the
>> legitimacy of my propo
Not self-promotion, that's not the reason.
Just needed to let out what I think about this.
Those who don't find it arguable in terms of general social behavior can ignore
this thread.
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 7:07 PM, John Y
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 2:07 PM, wrote:
> On 2020-05-24 11:31, other.arkitech wrote:
>
> > I am running an idea comparable you yours:
> > http://otheravu4v6pitvw.onion/
>
> Hi, Many thanks for your offer about your network. I would lik
Dear readers,
My intention is to respond to a public attack against my honesty and the
legitimacy of my proposal.
I am pretty annoyed for the behavior of this individual in the list towards the
system I am presenting here.
I don't know anything about him or her or whether they are a group of ga
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 8:16 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > [OA,] *you were asked here
> > https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2020-May/080618.html
> > to provide basic documentation, and you failed to provide an
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, May 25, 2020 10:33 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> > Crytocurrencies require a log of ALL TRANSACTIONS, not just the so called
> > utxo set...
>
> If one can form a consensus over one set of data, peoples
> favorite bloated
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 10:41 PM, jim bell wrote:
> Algorithm-agnostic anonymization network.
>
> Let's say we are agreed that a new anonymization network should be
> implemented. One problem is that advances in such networks generally
> require implementing
ly major current effort is gnunet https://gnunet.org/ which modularizes
p2p networking functions for reuse, as local services that provide them I
believe. It's very powerful but very few projects are using it; setup and a
verbose learning curve might be an entry barrier, unsure.
> K
>
&g
Agree, full privacy (including anonymity) is (should be) a foundational Right.
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, May 13, 2020 12:31 PM, Bill Roffmann
wrote:
> The consequences of invention are that some totalitarian will
Yoy can try the program 'meld'
https://meldmerge.org/
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, May 13, 2020 6:30 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Any diff (or git diff) gurus around?
>
> I often review one text document file against an updated file, and
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, May 11, 2020 9:56 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> > I am not afraid of IP4, the resource is already scarce and their cost
> > provides a good measure against attackers that are not The Man.
>
> They have almost zero cost. A
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, May 11, 2020 4:40 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> > arkitech:
> > The fact that you know the IP of the
> > nodes does not reveal anything else about the node behind
>
> Is the network traffic any way identifiable as being U
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, May 11, 2020 3:41 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> On 5/10/20, other.arkitech other.arkit...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> > I am working on prototyping a DEX (both D-Ex and De-X), I agree on the
> > criteria
I am working on prototyping a DEX (both D-Ex and De-X), I agree on the criteria
mentioned in this post, thx.
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, May 11, 2020 12:30 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> > https://en.bitcoinwiki.org/wiki/DEXes
>
> DEX is distributed e
FYI
I have renewed the landing page including more information about the USPS
cryptoplatform I've designed.
http://otheravu4v6pitvw.onion/
If you find it more convenient I have attached a pdf document with its content.
You are always welcome. Enjoy.
Thanks
--
Other Arkitech
Sent with [ProtonMa
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, May 7, 2020 1:24 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 11:39:47PM +0000, other.arkitech wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> > Just touching base with the cypherpunk lists.
> > Indeed I am quite frustrated with
Hi everyone,
Just touching base with the cypherpunk lists.
Indeed I am quite frustrated with the list, but who cares, I think this project
deserves interest (like many other out there this is true), but at least I'd
like to say I am alive and still evolving the project.
Last time I surfaced I w
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, March 5, 2020 10:57 PM, Philipp Angele
wrote:
> I created this alternative for seed phrases that allow you to memorize,
> verbally transfer and recover a private ECDSA key for Bitcoin and Ethereum.
Even though it would be hard to guess a secret key
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 11:34 PM, Zenaan Harkness
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 08:55:20PM +0000, other.arkitech wrote:
>
> > Dear friends,
> > Request For Criticism about what I'
Dear friends,
Request For Criticism about what I've written:
Current blockchains are all genesis-block based, which means they are
ever-growing structures. Aside of being under the effects of an elastic-gum
force that complicates their scalability in size, there exist problems scaling
on addre
What is A+ cert?
congrats ; )
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, February 4, 2020 11:47 AM, rooty wrote:
> Big shout out to cyberpunks list as I received hundreds if not thousands of
> emails and support of encouragement. What a great bunch of punks
>
> Regards rooty
>
> Orig
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, February 4, 2020 12:22 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> On 1/31/20, other.arkitech other.arkit...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> > coining the abbreviation USPS
>
> It seems like a coin, coins have tickers.
> It's not much of a good
[OBORONA-SPAM] ? this should be a false positive
answer inline..
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, February 2, 2020 12:20 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 10:24:33AM +0000, other.arkitech wrote:
>
> > > > I
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, February 1, 2020 10:27 AM, Zenaan Harkness
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 06:44:27PM -0300, Punk-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 13:24:02 +
> > "other.arkitech" other.arkit...@protonmail.com wrote:
&g
grarpamp, thanks for coining the abbreviation USPS, your answers inline..
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, January 31, 2020 10:28 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> On 1/30/20, other.arkitech other.arkit...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> > > &
>> closed sources running in a dedicated environment = no risk regarding
>> security.
>> For those concerned about running a node behind a firewall there is always
>> the option to isolate it
>> remote login ... ssh port 16671
>DMZ or not, the box is internet connected, and nobody
>knows what
I've released version alpha-11 of US-PUBLIC SYSTEM network.
Feedback, testers, welcome
http://otheravu4v6pitvw.onion/
Thank you.
--
Other Arkitech
It makes a lot of sense to me that tax equals theft.
However, my thoughts about tax goes on like when you buy a cup of coffee.
It is a self-choice to decide to commit to enter a shop and order one.
Once you committed the order on the counter you've entered into voluntary debt.
Now you'll run into p
> steal
> pirate
> leak
> plagiarise
> breach
> mirror
> clone
> replicate
> image
> intercept
> disseminate
> breach
> transgress
> microfilm
> xerox
> exfiltrate
> decrypt
> expose
> disclose
> compromise
> extract
> copy
> pinch
> crib
> abstract
>
would 'to pry' work?
Dear Cypherpunks, Other.Arkitech wish you a happy (and distributed) 2020
: )
Now some rehearsing content...
Excerpts from https://www.activism.net/cypherpunk/manifesto.html
Cypherpunks write code. We know that someone has to write software to defend
privacy, and since we can't get pr
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, December 20, 2019 9:07 PM, coderman wrote:
> tldr;
>
> Just use /dev/urandom!
I think urandom is secure as long as its output pass the Marsaglia die hard
tests (provide a fair unbiased unpredictable stream of bits)
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, December 16, 2019 11:14 PM, Zenaan Harkness
wrote:
> I am largely DC illiterate, so I shall only respond to 1 or 2 points.
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 03:53:09PM +, other.arkitech wrote:
>
> > > Let's take example p
> >
> > Q: Why do you think crypto anarchists would be interested in 'automating'
> > taxation (theft) and 'public budgets'
> > (distribution of stolen goods)
> > A: It forms part of a fight against centralized governments which are
> > expensive and do not respect privacy and
> > financial freed
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, December 15, 2019 12:24 PM, Zenaan Harkness
wrote:
> > If you want genuine traffic mixing
>
> Sorry, does not exist. That was unfortunate and problematic wording.
>
> Do not trust Tor, if you need privacy against the USA gov and its
> entities (MIC, NS
Zenaan, you said:
> Your communications on this list so far, seem to suggest that:
>
> - you have not spent sufficient time to understand the basic
> "security" issues which all humans presently face when
> interacting on the Internet
>
> - security, vs privacy, vs authentication, vs t
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, December 13, 2019 11:54 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> Privacy, non-history UTXO state db's, much higher tx rates,
> low fees, distributed, minimal features, no premine, founders, tax,
> stakes, or governance... and cross chain DEX (CCDEX)... as
> before, all
I post all answers to raised questions so far.
I'd like to receive more feedback about my new crypto platform, it is helpful
to me,
as they help me to write english rather than C++ , : )
http://otheravu4v6pitvw.onion/misc/downloads/answers_to_questions.txt
Thanks for the help
All invited to eval
Hello,
I have updated iso-images and added more information and screenshots.
from the feedback of previous post.
This is a new multi crypto currency platform I've developed from scratch for
the past ~3 years, it is run on raspberry pi.
I am looking for more testers and/or expert opinion. Happy to
57 matches
Mail list logo
