On November 12, 2019 12:49:07 PM PST, jim bell wrote:
>On Monday, November 11, 2019, 02:32:00 PM PST, Razer
>wrote:
>
>
>>Spoken like the nasty capitalist you are. Wtf are you doing on an
>Anarchist list child?
>
>
>As far as I can see, "capitalism" and "anarchy" should go quite well
On Monday, November 11, 2019, 02:32:00 PM PST, Razer wrote:
>Spoken like the nasty capitalist you are. Wtf are you doing on an Anarchist
>list child?
As far as I can see, "capitalism" and "anarchy" should go quite well together.
You know, "anarcho-capitalist".
"Capitalist" should
Spoken like the nasty capitalist you are. Wtf are you doing on an Anarchist
list child?
Rr
Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice
says that "Eric Ciaramella is the
> >whistleblower"?
> >This sure sounds like Facebook is adopting the policies of Red China,
> >"The Great Firewall of China".
> >I've got a solution to that problem: The people who work for Facebook
> >ar
On November 10, 2019 8:48:12 PM PST, jim bell wrote:
>On Sunday, November 10, 2019, 06:40:15 PM PST, Razer
>wrote:
>
>On November 9, 2019 12:53:03 PM PST, jim bell
>wrote:
>>I don't think that re-publishing a name, which has probably already
>>been re-re-re-re-re-re-re-published thousands
https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/dtyxs9/eric_ciaramella_facebook_and_twitter_are/
https://old.reddit.com/user/SerialBrain2/comments/dsgbdq/the_maestros_beautiful_chess_combination_for_the/
https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/dql7ql/trumpukraine_whistleblower_eric_ciaramella/
On Sunday, November 10, 2019, 06:40:15 PM PST, Razer wrote:
On November 9, 2019 12:53:03 PM PST, jim bell wrote:
>I don't think that re-publishing a name, which has probably already
>been re-re-re-re-re-re-re-published thousands of times, could
>constitute "interfering with a criminal
On November 9, 2019 12:53:03 PM PST, jim bell wrote:
>I don't think that re-publishing a name, which has probably already
>been re-re-re-re-re-re-re-published thousands of times, could
>constitute "interfering with a criminal investigation". But your
>imagination may differ.
> Jim
On November 9, 2019 12:53:03 PM PST, jim bell wrote:
>I don't think that re-publishing a name, which has probably already
>been re-re-re-re-re-re-re-published thousands of times, could
>constitute "interfering with a criminal investigation". But your
>imagination may differ.
> Jim
y "deleting the name"? Do they mean deleting
> >any posting or comment containing the name 'Eric Ciaramella'? Or just
> >that name? Or any posting that says that "Eric Ciaramella is the
> >whistleblower"?
> >This sure sounds like Facebook is adopting t
ys that "Eric Ciaramella is the
> >whistleblower"?
> >This sure sounds like Facebook is adopting the policies of Red China,
> >"The Great Firewall of China".
> >I've got a solution to that problem: The people who work for Facebook
> >are identifiable, and mortal.
> >
> >Notice that the news source this story came from is "apnews". How
> >appropriate.
> > Jim Bell
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> Rr
> Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice with K-9 Mail
>
> |
> |
> |
> | | |
>
> |
>
> |
> |
> | |
> Facebook is deleting the name of the potential whistleblower
>
> Facebook says it is deleting the name of the person who has been identified
> in conservative circles as the whist...
> |
>
> |
>
> |
>
>
>
>
;Notice that the news source this story came from is "apnews". How
>appropriate.
> Jim Bell
>
>
>
Rr
Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice with K-9 Mail
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| |
Facebook is deleting the name of the potential whistleblower
Facebook says it is deleting the name of the person who has been identified in
conservative circles as the whist...
|
|
|
who work for Facebook
>are identifiable, and mortal.
>
>Notice that the news source this story came from is "apnews". How
>appropriate.
> Jim Bell
>
>
>
Rr
Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice with K-9 Mail
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| |
Facebook is deleting the name of the potential whistleblower
Facebook says it is deleting the name of the person who has been identified in
conservative circles as the whist...
|
|
|
On November 9, 2019 12:53:03 PM PST, jim bell wrote:
>I don't think that re-publishing a name, which has probably already
>been re-re-re-re-re-re-re-published thousands of times, could
>constitute "interfering with a criminal investigation". But your
>imagination may differ.
>
I don't think that re-publishing a name, which has probably already been
re-re-re-re-re-re-re-published thousands of times, could constitute
"interfering with a criminal investigation". But your imagination may differ.
Jim Bell
On Saturday, November 9, 2019, 12:47:26 PM PST,
This is your answer and China will stomp you if you INTERFERE WITH A CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION too. So will any court system on earth.
Get psychiatric help.
"Facebook says it is removing mentions of the alleged whistleblower’s name and
will revisit this decision if the name is widely published
https://apnews.com/ad8f2a9b6e424138afcc97fcf2eb29bf
I wonder what they mean by "deleting the name"? Do they mean deleting any
posting or comment containing the name 'Eric Ciaramella'? Or just that name?
Or any posting that says that "Eric Ciaramella is the whistleblower"?
This sure sounds
17 matches
Mail list logo
