ruler and continue
to advance apace, now cpunks must embark on the next phase,
to go active in the real world, leverage hard and fintech resources,
design the cryptosphere of hardware, and roll out the
physical wetware, the #OpenFabs, the P2P fiber/RF baseband.
As with all Freedom, CryptoFreedom
This is not an OpenFab, it's not running under
OpenAudit process, it's not printing OpenHW,
thus expect more backdoored CPUs and NICs
and USBs etc from it...
Intel To Buy Chip Fabricator GlobalFoundaries For $30 Billion In
Biggest Deal Yet: WSJ
Thursday was another rough day for the semiconducto
https://openpowerfoundation.org/libre-soc-180nm-power-isa-asic-submitted-to-imec-for-fabrication/
https://libre-soc.org/
http://git.libre-soc.org/
https://libre-soc.org/openpower/sv/svp64/
https://github.com/antonblanchard/microwatt/
https://openpowerfoundation.org/openpower-foundation-provides-mi
/takeaway.pdf
Props:
https://meltdownattack.com/
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL7Jsn37GlvSwYGaetkukEROk9Ew8OUoHj
#OpenFabs , #OpenCPU , #OpenHW , #OpenAudit ... Get er done...
https://rootsofprogress.org/how-early-american-inventors-funded-their-ventures
https://www.bunniestudios.com/blog/?p=5706
https://youtu.be/Hzb37RyagCQ
https://youtu.be/RqQhWitJ1As
https://www.buzzfeed.com/markdistefano/conservative-mps-signal-whatsapp
Privacy coins next...
PlunderVolt
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=In3B9L5Jyo4
https://blog.kraken.com/post/3245/flaw-found-
On 2019-08-12 4:44 am, Steven Schear wrote:
ATM, you're correct. However, there is no reason to assume most or all
of these deficiencies can't be overcome.
Personally, although scalability is an issue, I prefer non-litho
approaches (e.g., electron beam lithography).
Scanning tunneling micro
Well, it's certainly an interesting concept that a person can make chips "in
his own garage", etc.
I did my own share of circuit design, mostly in the 1970's, designing and
fabricating PC boards (That's "printed circuit", not "personal computer", and
certainly not "politically-correct"!!!)
http://sam.zeloof.xyz/category/semiconductor/
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20657398
I am very excited to announce the details of my first integrated
circuit and share the journey that this project has taken me on over
the past year. I hope that my success will inspire others and help
start
https://www.crowdsupply.com/libre-risc-v/m-class/updates/first-nlnet-grant-approved-to-fund-development
https://libre-riscv.org/3d_gpu/
http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Intel-and-Valve-collaborate-to-develop-open-source-graphics-drivers-1649632.html
#OpenFabs, #OpenHW, #OpenBiz
Delivering
On 10/13/2018 10:50 PM, grarpamp wrote:
>> But write-once CDs are pretty safe, I think. No?
>
> In customary use, probably, far more than any of the formerly
> mentioned non hardware write protectable devices.
>
> To be sure you'd need to use it in a old drive that has no
> writing capability,
>> There is never "no" disk, just a matter of which ones
>> are plugged into the box, physically, or remotely.
> using USB
... is using an attached disk, ie: a read-write [block device],
that can be trivially written to by / through the kernel driver
interfaces or in the raw. Unless it has a hard
justify purchasing obsolete laptops in bulk and destroying
> each after one use. "Fingerprint MY hardware will ya, you bastards?
> HA! Take that!" Just sayin'.
Indeed.
Chameleon HW ftw I guess - #OpenHW #OpenFabs
Parameterizable everything - as in, every parameter which can be
On 10/13/2018 08:42 AM, Mirimir wrote:
>> There is never "no" disk, just a matter of which ones
>> are plugged into the box, physically, or remotely.
>
> OK, I should have said "unless there _is_ no disk, as there _can be_ in
> Tails". I've run Tails (and my own LiveCDs) on diskless machines. A
On 10/12/2018 11:56 PM, grarpamp wrote:
This is the use case for Tails. . . . [T]here are no writes to storage,
unless users configure [otherwise] . . . .
>
>> Sure, but this isn't a _Tor_ issue. It's just about Tor browser, which
>> is just (heavily) modified Firefox. And although I'm n
Some claim to offer additional protections such
as signed firmware loads, etc.
Any firmwares involved may or may not be protected
against BadUSB... ask them how their write protect
etc works... if you're brave / dumb enough to believe their
non #OpenFabs , non #OpenHW marketing lies a
will you learn, create, sell, and deploy your
own proactive defense like...
#OpenFabs , #OpenHW , #OpenSW , #OpenDev , #OpenBiz
These things are possible! And immensely profitable as a feature.
Do them.
Now.
[bcc due to metzdowd's unfree censors]
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 01:41:34 -0400
grarpamp wrote:
>
>
> If this solution uses today's computers to drive the beam, since
> those computers cannot be trusted, and you can't see the beam
> or resultant features
ok...
>
> I suggest that building an OpenFab capable of producing a
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 01:41:34AM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Steven Schear
> wrote:
> > Jim Bell and I commented some time ago on this dilemma. One obvious solution
> > is "table top" manufacture of VLSI.
> >
> > As crazy as it sounds, for at least prototyping and
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Steven Schear wrote:
> Jim Bell and I commented some time ago on this dilemma. One obvious solution
> is "table top" manufacture of VLSI.
>
> As crazy as it sounds, for at least prototyping and small (CPunk) PoC
> projects, its possible to fab a wide variety of ch
uct, from relays
> to vacuum tubes to silicon to gigagate masks is already known
> form history, thus requires zero research.
>
> The research is in how to do the rebuild under a model that
> imparts explicit open reliable reviewable documented n-man
> rule realtime operating and his
is in how to do the rebuild under a model that
imparts explicit open reliable reviewable documented n-man
rule realtime operating and historical chain of reasonably
bulletproof trust.
#OpenFabs, #OpenHW, #OpenSW
Such a project could be seeded and continuously funded by
#CryptoCurrencies, #D
Coming soon, 700mm X 7nm of closed and secretly backdoored goodness...
http://www.anandtech.com/show/11558/globalfoundries-details-7-nm-plans-three-generations-700-mm-hvm-in-2018
At 10% gate density, that's over 200B gates / cm^2.
But hey, "You can trust us".
500 chips = Brain, at least as to si
22 matches
Mail list logo
