Skrymions: Data storage breakthough

> juan juan.g71 at gmail.com > Fri Apr 14 04:22:51 PDT 2017 > > I am waiting for any cypherpunk or non-cypherpunk to provide > any evidence to support the optimistic, false, and highly > dangerous, pro-technology stance. You faggot. Only a dipshit reads "false and highly dangerous" and thinks

Re: Skrymions: Data storage breakthough

On 04/14/2017 08:57 AM, \0xDynamite wrote: >> Now, back to a cypherpunks-relevant topic : > Fine. > >> I am waiting for any cypherpunk or non-cypherpunk to provide >> any evidence to support the optimistic, false and highly >> dangerous, pro-technology stance. > Here one:

Re: Skrymions: Data storage breakthough

> Now, back to a cypherpunks-relevant topic : Fine. > I am waiting for any cypherpunk or non-cypherpunk to provide > any evidence to support the optimistic, false and highly > dangerous, pro-technology stance. Here one: The Internet provides the last hope of actually

Re: Skrymions: Data storage breakthough

On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 03:22:54 -0400 "\\0xDynamite" wrote: > No, you see, you did it. I said cross-fertilize to fill each other's > scriptural gaps, but you turned it into cultural annihilation. How > did you reason that one? so you are hijacking 'my'

Re: Skrymions: Data storage breakthough

On 04/13/2017 08:11 PM, \0xDynamite wrote: > It's a fine point, but this problem is far more subtle than oppressive > forces. In the issue of Iraqis, for example, there is an issue of > ignorance. If someone in the West would have taken the time to teach > them and cross-ferilize cultures,

Re: Skrymions: Data storage breakthough

It's a fine point, but this problem is far more subtle than oppressive forces. In the issue of Iraqis, for example, there is an issue of ignorance. If someone in the West would have taken the time to teach them and cross-ferilize cultures, these things wouldn't happen. But no one did that.

Re: Skrymions: Data storage breakthough

On 04/13/2017 07:11 PM, \0xDynamite wrote: > > The people activists paint as "evil empire" are comical, as in > literally something mythological and from a comic book. A million and a half... perhaps twice that number, of dead Iraqis, would debate that point. Rr

Re: Skrymions: Data storage breakthough

>> I said it before. Heavy industry amplifies human will. High >> technology amplifies the mind. They can amplify virtue or vice. > > True, but not really what I am getting at. > > It seems to me that 'you guys' the cypherpunks/technology > optimists have a naive or shallow

Re: Skrymions: Data storage breakthough

On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:59:22 -0400 "\\0xDynamite" wrote: > I said it before. Heavy industry amplifies human will. High > technology amplifies the mind. They can amplify virtue or vice. True, but not really what I am getting at. It seems to me that

Re: Skrymions: Data storage breakthough

I said it before. Heavy industry amplifies human will. High technology amplifies the mind. They can amplify virtue or vice. Neither care. Marx0s On 4/12/17, juan wrote: > On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 17:04:47 + (UTC) > jim bell wrote: > >>> From: juan

Re: Skrymions: Data storage breakthough

On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 17:04:47 + (UTC) jim bell wrote: >> From: juan >> >better technology, better mass surveillance > That's a rather limited way to look at things.   Maybe limited, but do you think what I say is incorrect? Perhaps

Re: Skrymions: Data storage breakthough

better technology, better mass surveillance

Skrymions: Data storage breakthough

http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2017/04/11/scientists-tout-tout-data-storage-breakthough.html This reminds me of magnetic-bubble technology, which was relatively big in the late 1970's and early 1980's.  Intel made magnetic bubble devices up to a capacity of 1 megabits/device, which was considered