> juan juan.g71 at gmail.com
> Fri Apr 14 04:22:51 PDT 2017
>
> I am waiting for any cypherpunk or non-cypherpunk to provide
> any evidence to support the optimistic, false, and highly
> dangerous, pro-technology stance.
You faggot. Only a dipshit reads "false and highly dangerous" and
thinks yo
On 04/14/2017 08:57 AM, \0xDynamite wrote:
>> Now, back to a cypherpunks-relevant topic :
> Fine.
>
>> I am waiting for any cypherpunk or non-cypherpunk to provide
>> any evidence to support the optimistic, false and highly
>> dangerous, pro-technology stance.
> Here one: The
> Now, back to a cypherpunks-relevant topic :
Fine.
> I am waiting for any cypherpunk or non-cypherpunk to provide
> any evidence to support the optimistic, false and highly
> dangerous, pro-technology stance.
Here one: The Internet provides the last hope of actually pro
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 03:22:54 -0400
"\\0xDynamite" wrote:
> No, you see, you did it. I said cross-fertilize to fill each other's
> scriptural gaps, but you turned it into cultural annihilation. How
> did you reason that one?
so you are hijacking 'my' completely relevant points/thread
No, you see, you did it. I said cross-fertilize to fill each other's
scriptural gaps, but you turned it into cultural annihilation. How
did you reason that one?
Marxos
On 4/13/17, Razer wrote:
>
>
> On 04/13/2017 08:11 PM, \0xDynamite wrote:
>> It's a fine point, but this problem is far more
On 04/13/2017 08:11 PM, \0xDynamite wrote:
> It's a fine point, but this problem is far more subtle than oppressive
> forces. In the issue of Iraqis, for example, there is an issue of
> ignorance. If someone in the West would have taken the time to teach
> them and cross-ferilize cultures, thes
It's a fine point, but this problem is far more subtle than oppressive
forces. In the issue of Iraqis, for example, there is an issue of
ignorance. If someone in the West would have taken the time to teach
them and cross-ferilize cultures, these things wouldn't happen. But
no one did that. Ther
On 04/13/2017 07:11 PM, \0xDynamite wrote:
>
> The people activists paint as "evil empire" are comical, as in
> literally something mythological and from a comic book.
A million and a half... perhaps twice that number, of dead Iraqis, would
debate that point.
Rr
>> I said it before. Heavy industry amplifies human will. High
>> technology amplifies the mind. They can amplify virtue or vice.
>
> True, but not really what I am getting at.
>
> It seems to me that 'you guys' the cypherpunks/technology
> optimists have a naive or shallow und
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:59:22 -0400
"\\0xDynamite" wrote:
> I said it before. Heavy industry amplifies human will. High
> technology amplifies the mind. They can amplify virtue or vice.
True, but not really what I am getting at.
It seems to me that 'you guys' the cypherpunks/
I said it before. Heavy industry amplifies human will. High
technology amplifies the mind. They can amplify virtue or vice.
Neither care.
Marx0s
On 4/12/17, juan wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 17:04:47 + (UTC)
> jim bell wrote:
>
>>> From: juan
>>> >better technology, better mass surveill
On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 17:04:47 + (UTC)
jim bell wrote:
>> From: juan
>> >better technology, better mass surveillance
> That's a rather limited way to look at things.
Maybe limited, but do you think what I say is incorrect?
Perhaps technology in general could be 'neutral'
From: juan
>better technology, better mass surveillance
That's a rather limited way to look at things. Let's consider: Are we better
off due to (computer and information) technology than, say, 1980? In 1980,
home computers were little more than toys, and the Internet as the public now
knows
better technology, better mass surveillance
http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2017/04/11/scientists-tout-tout-data-storage-breakthough.html
This reminds me of magnetic-bubble technology, which was relatively big in the
late 1970's and early 1980's. Intel made magnetic bubble devices up to a
capacity of 1 megabits/device, which was considered
15 matches
Mail list logo
