> John Newman jnn at synfin.org
> Sat Mar 18 04:27:41 PDT 2017
>
> Fantasists do spin fantasies
Yes, yes, the hacking hackers and the larping larpers; sounds swell !
> irreverent fascist
But im a cheeto lickin weed smokin commie like you.
✌♫♪˙❤‿❤˙♫♪✌
Glad to see you got that dictionary.
> On Mar 17, 2017, at 2:51 PM, MAGA
> performed:
> Expand your vocabulary, fam.
>
Fantasists do spin fantasies, jack.
Like the absurd fantasy that your "irreverent fascist" schtick holds any charm
;)
On 03/17/2017 07:41 AM, John Newman wrote:
>
>
>> On Mar 17, 2017, at 12:03 AM, grarpamp wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:39 PM, juan wrote:
>>>that would be great!! if it was true - it most likely isn't.
>>
>> The odds of getting any government to make a substantial cut
>> in a
On Sat, 18 Mar 2017 10:17:28 +1000
"James A. Donald" wrote:
>
> This budget does not defund science.
you mean 'science' (or government pseudo science) and no, of
course it doesn't.
> It does not defund the poor.
the americunt government-oligarchy is obviosly
On 2017-03-17 21:41, John Newman wrote:
Despite the moronic fantasies of reactionary monarchist fantasists like James Donald, this is not
Trump on his way to becoming "King Trump" or "Trump playing 4d chess"...
he's just an incompetent hack, like most politicians, except people really
fucking h
> John Newman jnn at synfin.org
> Fri Mar 17 04:41:17 PDT 2017
>
> cohort of nazis.
Das rite, the democrats dindunuffin !
> fantasies / fantasists
Expand your vocabulary, fam.
> "King Trump"
It's 'God Emperor Trump', fucker. Pics related.
> playing 4d chess
He's on to 88D now; Just say no !
> On Mar 17, 2017, at 12:03 AM, grarpamp wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:39 PM, juan wrote:
>>that would be great!! if it was true - it most likely isn't.
>
> The odds of getting any government to make a substantial cut
> in anything other than your paycheck, before getting rid
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:03:28AM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:39 PM, juan wrote:
> > that would be great!! if it was true - it most likely isn't.
>
> The odds of getting any government to make a substantial cut
> in anything other than your paycheck, before gettin
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:39 PM, juan wrote:
> that would be great!! if it was true - it most likely isn't.
The odds of getting any government to make a substantial cut
in anything other than your paycheck, before getting rid of said
government, are pretty slim.
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 23:04:36 -0400
grarpamp wrote:
> https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-presidential-budget-2018-proposal/
>
> The U.S. Office of Management and Budget has released a budget
> "blueprint" which outlines substantial cuts in both basic research and
> applied tec
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-presidential-budget-2018-proposal/
The U.S. Office of Management and Budget has released a budget
"blueprint" which outlines substantial cuts in both basic research and
applied technology funding. The proposal includes a whopping 18%
reduction
11 matches
Mail list logo
