Re: The issue of "logs" is a 1A issue, not a matter of "funding"

On Wednesday, May 2, 2001, at 08:07 AM, David Honig wrote: > At 06:14 PM 5/1/01 -0700, Tim May wrote: >> The real argument is that commanding a person to keep records of whom >> he >> communicates with (which is what a log of messages is all about) is a >> slam dunk violation of the First Amendm

Re: The issue of "logs" is a 1A issue, not a matter of "funding"

At 06:14 PM 5/1/01 -0700, Tim May wrote: >The real argument is that commanding a person to keep records of whom he >communicates with (which is what a log of messages is all about) is a >slam dunk violation of the First Amendment. It is no more acceptable >than an order commanding Alice to reco

Re: The issue of "logs" is a 1A issue, not a matter of "funding"

On Tuesday, May 1, 2001, at 07:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > At Tue, 1 May 2001 18:14:38 -0700, Tim May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The real argument is that commanding a person to keep records of whom >> he communicates with (which is what a log of messages is all about) is >> a slam dun

Re: The issue of "logs" is a 1A issue, not a matter of "funding"

At Tue, 1 May 2001 18:14:38 -0700, Tim May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >The real argument is that commanding a person to keep records of whom >he communicates with (which is what a log of messages is all about) is >a slam dunk violation of the First Amendment. It is no more acceptable >than an

The issue of "logs" is a 1A issue, not a matter of "funding"

On Tuesday, May 1, 2001, at 03:51 PM, David Honig wrote: > At 09:17 AM 4/30/01 -0400, Matthew Gaylor wrote: >> I remember having lunch a while back with Loki and the topic of logs >> come up- He mentioned that his company fully and completely complies >> with warrants for all logs, especially ea