WORK SMARTER..NOT HARDER
It's So Simple To Earn $2,000 - $5,000 Per Week Nowadays...
We're searching for only 10 elite individuals with the work ethic
necessary to generate a cash-flow for themselves of $2,000 - $5,000 per
week, and to increase that to over $20,000 per month, in as litt
At 06:46 PM 3/28/00 -0500, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>Actually Mattel yesterday was talking about a class action suit against
>the *cphack mirror site operators*.
Another example of "Law in the Corporate Interest".
And people wonder why I am an anarchist...
---
| Terrorists - The Boog
At 07:40 PM 3/28/00 -0500, Wei Dai wrote:
>I've already decided not to buy anything from Intel again (more because
>of their lack of driver support than anything else). If AMD really
>follows though on this deal I'm going to have a really hard time buying
>my next computer.
Linux runs on the alp
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 04:16:39PM -0500, Peter Gutmann wrote:
> (For people who don't know what EMBASSY is, it's a kind of combination of
> Clipper and DIVX, although recently they've tried to deemphasise this since
> noone was buying it - see earlier posts to cypherpunks on this topic. Maybe
Actually Mattel yesterday was talking about a class action suit against the
*cphack mirror site operators*.
I kid you not.
-Declan
At 18:28 3/28/2000 -0500, Paul Spirito wrote:
>On 28 Mar 2000 13:19:42 -0500,
>Jered Floyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Then you should sue them. People k
On 28 Mar 2000 13:19:42 -0500,
Jered Floyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then you should sue them. People keep talking about attacking the
> censorware vendors over issues like this, but nobody has yet to do so.
> Why not? Not enough free time, I suppose.
Also a scruple against elevating libel
At 01:55 PM 3/28/00 -0500, Tim May wrote:
>At 12:10 PM -0500 3/28/00, William H. Geiger III wrote:
>In a free society, people or other entities may give opinions as they
>wish. Including, but not limited to, opinions about restaurants,
>movies, companies, sites, books, and so on.
There's a case
At 12:10 PM -0500 3/28/00, William H. Geiger III wrote:
>I just received the following note:
>
>I find this to be slanderous, and a defamation of my character, harmful to
>both by personal & business reputation. In addition, Microsystems, is
>fully aware that my website is not involved in a
> Don't take offense at such personal deconstruction. I'm
> merely pointing out what we *actually* know, vs. what
> is claimed.
Your reply was the funniest thing I've read today. "Group of ephemeral
psyop pranksters" indeed!
==
Mark Leigh
> I find this to be slanderous, and a defamation of my character, harmful to
> both by personal & business reputation. In addition, Microsystems, is
> fully aware that my website is not involved in any of the above activities
> that they claim.
Then you should sue them. People keep talking about
I just received the following note:
- Start Quote -
I thought you might find this interesting... not surprising though
unfortunately. The only access I have to the internet is through my dads
computer which features the fine product Winproxy :P. Anyhow, when I
tried to go to the censor
SHAREHOLDER & INVESTOR ALERT!
http://204.1.122.12/0482jds852ma/immunis.html
ImmuNis Corp a small Biotech Stock with Big Potential.
The Stock Savvy Investor Forum recommends that you
evaluate the investment potential of ImmuNis Corp shares.
ImmuNis Corp (OTCBB: IMMCE), owns a major interest
12 matches
Mail list logo
