POTS encryption product.

2000-07-22 Thread BMM
http://www.l-3com.com/cs-east/programs/infosec/privatel.htm A triple-DES bump-in-the-cord encrypter, retails for ~US$600. Any actual retail product offerings from Starium? How many years has it been? POTS encryption _should_ be a killer app, even if noone realizes it yet. Why would someone fe

Re: Jim Und Dave?Thanks Mr anon

2000-07-22 Thread David Marshall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Mr Anon did a good job. If Jm and dave don't like the heat get out of the > kitchen.Get a job thats more dangerous like a taxi driver or clerk at 7-11 Or an AOL tech support representative. I hear that they're subjected to idiocy in quantities far in excess of what i

Re: Dropping toad.com

2000-07-22 Thread David Marshall
"Patrick Henry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jim Choate wrote: > > As of today the current toad.com member list is below. > > I can't believe that 1) the who command is enabled on toad, and 2) that you'd > post all these addresses to the list. Talk about a massive invasion of privacy. First,

RE: ZKS economic analysis

2000-07-22 Thread Steve Schear
At 07:30 PM 7/21/00 -0400, David Honig wrote: >At 07:00 PM 7/21/00 -0400, Tim May wrote: > >At 5:00 PM -0400 7/21/00, David Honig wrote: > >>Really? What's to stop me from 'gargoyling' (to use a _snow crash_ term): > >>running a few VCRs on my surroundings as I wander in public, later indexing > >

Re: Data in your mind vs. encrypted

2000-07-22 Thread Steven Furlong
"Benjamin M. Brewer" wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Trei, Peter wrote: > > It's my understanding that there's a precedent in which > > a government audit of a merchant was halted, or at > > least seriously delayed, when it was discovered that all > > of his business records where in Hebrew. The

Re: John Young, the PSIA, and Aum

2000-07-22 Thread William H. Geiger III
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 07/22/00 at 08:09 PM, Meyer Wolfsheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >I feel that, if we as individuals are going to demand that our privacy be >put back into our own hands (where it definately belongs), we need to >recognize that this is a two way street. Decendants of

Re: Christianity vs. the 2nd ammendment

2000-07-22 Thread Anon User
Marcel Popescu wrote: > In light of the above it is interesting and instructive to note the thoughts > of the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzche in his work Beyond Good and > Evil: The name is Nietzsche. By the way, how did you like Zarathustra? I found the "God is dead" part quite impressiv

Re: ZKS: how EXACTLY does this protect privacy?

2000-07-22 Thread Steven Furlong
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > You say you received it, which list node are you subscribed to? Did > anyone else receive it? > > Subject: Re: ZKS: how EXACTLY does this protect privacy? I received approximately five copies. -- Steve Furlong, Computer Condottiere Have GNU, will travel 518-3

Re: John Young, the PSIA, and Aum

2000-07-22 Thread William H. Geiger III
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 07/22/00 at 08:09 PM, Meyer Wolfsheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >I feel that, if we as individuals are going to demand that our privacy be >put back into our own hands (where it definately belongs), we need to >recognize that this is a two way street. Decendants of

Wired News : Privacy's Yin and Yang

2000-07-22 Thread Santa
From Wired News, available online at: http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,37610,00.html Privacy's Yin and Yang by David Sims 10:00 a.m. Jul. 21, 2000 PDT MONTEREY, California -- Astrophysics professor Gregory Benford says we're in the early days of an escalating "arms race" between sof

Re: ZKS: how EXACTLY does this protect privacy?

2000-07-22 Thread Harmon Seaver
And this is at least the 3rd time I've gotten it, probably everyone else did also -- so what's your point? Or are you just spamming? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > (try again #3...) > > Tim writes: > > (Of course, the fact that their extremely complicated Terms and > > Conditions means they w

RE: Data in your mind vs. encrypted

2000-07-22 Thread Benjamin M. Brewer
On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Trei, Peter wrote: > It's my understanding that there's a precedent in which > a government audit of a merchant was halted, or at > least seriously delayed, when it was discovered that all > of his business records where in Hebrew. The court > ruled that (1) He had no obli