http://www.the-times.co.uk/news/pages/tim/2000/09/01/timnwsnws01037.html
Title:
The Times: Britain:Blair orders DNA register of criminals
http://www.the-times.co.uk/news/pages/tim/2000/09/01/timnwsnws01037.html
Title:
The Times: Britain:Blair orders DNA register of criminals
David Honig wrote:
>
> At 06:42 AM 9/1/00 -0400, Steven Furlong wrote:
>>
>
> I think this is a net.legend
Could be. If so, a major news service was taken in, at least briefly.
Not that that's never happened before.
>, the plant's synthesis of that complex
> molecule would require porting a
At 06:42 AM 9/1/00 -0400, Steven Furlong wrote:
>Why, that was indeed done. I printed the news article (CNN or some
>such) but can't find either the printout or the reference, so what
>follows is short on details. I read about it maybe a year ago.
>
>A scientist in California let his son borrow hi
At 09:56 AM 9/1/00 -0400, Sampo A Syreeni wrote:
>
>Nuh. I think they should be happy about biology education - might one day
>give them a nice young crackpot with the talent to create a drug user
>killing flu...
>
Then they lose a taxpayer or at least prison slave labor.
The US govt funds rese
At 10:52 PM 8/31/00 -0400, Sean Roach wrote:
>Nature of the beast. You "create" something, and you feel that you should
>decide how it's used.
Also Frankenstein phenomenon...
>If you "create" a podium, and someone steps up and
>gives a speach that is diametrically opposed to what you stand
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, David Marshall wrote:
> Tim May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > choppers are zooming up and down the canyons as part of "CAMP," the
> > Campaign Against Marijuana Production. Choppers find pot fields,
> > troops are dispatched, shoot-outs occur. All over a plant, an
> >
> --
> From: David Marshall[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: David Marshall
> Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 2:17 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: Re: Robert Cailliau: turncoat?
>
> Sean Roach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > And the Iris
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, David Marshall wrote:
>The boom of molecular biology may very well throw drug enforcement for
>a loop. For a simple example, assume that a drug-friendly biologist
>isolated the gene for THC, and spliced it into some other kind of
>plant. The result is a fruit or vegitable whic
Sampo A Syreeni wrote:
>
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Tom Vogt wrote:
>
> >> would put it at about 26^3200, which is on the order of 2^12000. Go
> >> ahead, I await your method of brute forcing that.
> >
> >yes, but would you TYPE 3200 characters every morning to log in?
>
> Besides, it is quite like
David Marshall wrote:
> The boom of molecular biology may very well throw drug enforcement for
> a loop. For a simple example, assume that a drug-friendly biologist
> isolated the gene for THC, and spliced it into some other kind of
> plant. The result is a fruit or vegitable which has THC in it,
Tim May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> choppers are zooming up and down the canyons as part of "CAMP," the
> Campaign Against Marijuana Production. Choppers find pot fields,
> troops are dispatched, shoot-outs occur. All over a plant, an
> agricultural product which several of the Founders grew
i refuse to listen to "[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Marshall)". i am
growing tired of your bullshit. please don't bother to reply
Ah, it's the slow season.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Claim that, among other things, the claim that he isn't quoting is
false, deleted.]
[Sentence fragment in which he totally misses the point deleted.]
[Complaint that he was profiled due to his lack of quoting and his
trolling deleted. Also d
Merchant Status will help you increase sales by an
incredible 50% to 400%. Stop losing valuable sales!
With one phone call you can be:
Accepting all major credit cards!
Accepting checks over the net or by Fax!
Accepting real time processing for member sites!
Gaining costumer loyalty and trust
well, gentlemen... let me appease you. to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" (there are your quotations. well, quotation marks
at least. hope that is enough) if i come off mad and testosterone poisoned,
let me correct your misunderstanding. in no way am i either. i am laughing at
you
"Bartley R. Troyan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Marshall wrote:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > > and to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > > besides your rude, bullshit comments, do you have anything worth wile to say
> > > to back you up?!? or are you just being a dumb-fuck and talking
i have no time for morons like you 2. how old are you all and you are acting
so immature. a teenager is making wiser and more thought provoking
converstaion than the 2 of you trying to gang up on me accusing me of this
crap that couldn't be further from the truth. and because of what? i make a
I'll assume you're talking to me. Since you didn't include any quoted
material with an attribution, I have no context for what you're
rambling on about.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'll assume that you're talking to me. Since you didn't bother to
include any quoted material with an attribution, I
oh. and you need not write back please unless you are ready to just share
opinions and ideas (that is what i had originally intended if you would have
read my 1st mail) maturely and in a pleasant fashion instead of just personal
attacks that do nothing instead of piss people off. i am here to b
David Marshall wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > and to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > besides your rude, bullshit comments, do you have anything worth wile to say
> > to back you up?!? or are you just being a dumb-fuck and talking out of your
> > ass?
>
> When you and Putz post something on-
21 matches
Mail list logo
