Free Cable* TV
burch lithography sommelier extirpate covalent exorcist courtney trivial climb schoolhouse brethren rosalie domingo expel assurance quandary drew cleanse tundra inept propyl thrall deferring mantrap scalp antisemitic as southey flail compulsive herewith
victual oedipal
Free Cable!TV
nectar battery calvinist steam binocular crab doberman mailman sudanese loyal permissible attendee agglutinate cattail blair alfresco perez boone drive fully tanh egress rho sarasota rudder sportswriter bambi cinder grail blouse
hannah hahn serge saline eastland algorithmic
Thanks Steve, I don't think I have heard this before. I googled on the text you quoted
and found this url
http://wais.stanford.edu/Iraq/iraq_andambassaprilglaspie22303.html
and a few more
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ARTICLE5/april.html
Send holiday cheer and a
flip phone this year...for nothing!
Everyone's Approved and there is no Annual contract!!
Find out more today!
http://ab.getquicknews.com/newlc/go/3090
Follow this link if you no longer wish to be contacted.
http://ab.getquicknews.com/central/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.fauxnewschannel.com/
Bukkake barn house
The Bukkake Barn House the most perverse
camshots seen on the internet. They're
definitely bad.
Don't miss this one.
Banned in 17 countries!
See this here:
http://old.0CMf8PZhrR.26pVM.starterz.net/bukkake/index.html
Delete from baze
On 20 Dec 2003 at 12:40, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Thanks Steve, I don't think I have heard this before. I googled on the
text you quoted and found this url
http://wais.stanford.edu/Iraq/iraq_andambassaprilglaspie22303.html
and a few more
I'm not sure what your motivation is for wanting to rewrite history, but that isn't what Glaspie said.
There's a video interview I saw about all of this on 60 minutes (I think) where it was made clear that Glaspie did in fact say to Saddam that "We have no opinion on your Arab - Arab conflicts,
Free Cable+ TV
yachtsman limelight delight cankerworm subsidy transducer navy brace sauce aerosol amy troutman wring oboe tetanus clockwise lufthansa misanthrope horse onrush circumstance aliquot bulge bloodbath tranquil cross attache craftsmen dreadnought leachate searchlight dynastic
At 08:18 PM 12/19/03 -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
[on onion routing POTS]
trace that call, or payment for that matter. So if bin Laden were
feelin'
lonely one day and signed onto the network, you could give him a call,
without him worrying about the missles falling within a few minutes.
-TD
If
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20-Dec-03, at 1:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what your motivation is for wanting to rewrite history,
but that
isn't what Glaspie said.
I am guessing here that he just wants to believe that the US is acting
in their foreign
--
On 19 Dec 2003 at 21:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's bullshit. Saddam was told by our Chick ambassador (I
can't remember her name) that the US had no interest in his
dispute with Kuwait, in effect giving Saddam a green light.
Commie lie
http://www.californiacoastline.org/streisand/pressrelease-decision.html
Ken Adleman and his wife photographed the entire California coastline
from their helicopter and put it on line free to the public.
Barbara Streisand, ostensible environmentalist, sued because it might let
gawking fans figure
--
On 20 Dec 2003 at 13:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a video interview I saw about all of this on 60
minutes (I think) where it was made clear that Glaspie did in
fact say to Saddam that We have no opinion on your Arab -
Arab conflicts, such as your dispute with Kuwait.
And, as
--
On 19 Dec 2003 at 22:23, Anonymous wrote:
Re saddam et all...
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/EL19Ak01.html
The war of words over Saddam Bush is quite amusing. The
blind faith in ones govt structure and the willingness to
support force that is in such extreme measure
I don't know who you are referring too, but that comment is amusing,
because it is exactly the kind of lambaste broadside that one hears on
Faux news channel all the time. Anyway, I say that Saddam has human
rights, just like everyone else, which includes due process, right to
counsel, and to
At 05:41 PM 12/20/2003 -0800, James A. Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
On 19 Dec 2003 at 22:23, Anonymous wrote:
Re saddam et all...
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/EL19Ak01.html
The war of words over Saddam Bush is quite amusing. The
blind faith in ones govt structure and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-12-21 03:50Z) wrote:
I don't know who you are referring too, but that comment is amusing,
because it is exactly the kind of lambaste broadside that one hears on
Faux news channel all the time. Anyway, I say that Saddam has human
rights, just like everyone else, which
--
On 19 Dec 2003 at 15:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there is no one with legitimate jurisdiction to try
Saddam, then he should be released.
You are making De Sade's argument against natural law, to which
his prosecutors rightly made the riposte, that if no one had
the right to
On 19 Dec, James A. Donald wrote:
--
On 19 Dec 2003 at 15:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there is no one with legitimate jurisdiction to try
Saddam, then he should be released.
You are making De Sade's argument against natural law, to which
his prosecutors rightly made the riposte,
--
On 19 Dec 2003 at 19:50, Nomen Nescio wrote:
I don't think I've ever heard that the Nazi prisoners where
drugged, abused or otherwice tortured or mistreated and
humiliated. Feel free to enlighten me on this.
if you count a haircut as abuse, torture, and mistreatment, I
expect that they
Re saddam et all...
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/EL19Ak01.html
The war of words over Saddam Bush is quite amusing. The blind faith in ones
govt structure and the willingness to support force that is in such extreme
measure overpowering and statist such as the dropping of tons of
On 20 Dec 2003 at 12:40, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Thanks Steve, I don't think I have heard this before. I googled on the
text you quoted and found this url
http://wais.stanford.edu/Iraq/iraq_andambassaprilglaspie22303.html
and a few more
http://www.fauxnewschannel.com/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20-Dec-03, at 1:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what your motivation is for wanting to rewrite history,
but that
isn't what Glaspie said.
I am guessing here that he just wants to believe that the US is acting
in their foreign
I'm not sure what your motivation is for wanting to rewrite history, but that isn't what Glaspie said.
There's a video interview I saw about all of this on 60 minutes (I think) where it was made clear that Glaspie did in fact say to Saddam that "We have no opinion on your Arab - Arab conflicts,
Thanks Steve, I don't think I have heard this before. I googled on the text you quoted
and found this url
http://wais.stanford.edu/Iraq/iraq_andambassaprilglaspie22303.html
and a few more
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ARTICLE5/april.html
At 08:18 PM 12/19/03 -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
[on onion routing POTS]
trace that call, or payment for that matter. So if bin Laden were
feelin'
lonely one day and signed onto the network, you could give him a call,
without him worrying about the missles falling within a few minutes.
-TD
If
--
On 19 Dec 2003 at 21:21, Steve Schear wrote:
I have direct instructions from the President to seek better
relations with Iraq. [] Our opinion is that you should have
the opportunity to rebuild your country. But we have no
opinion on Arab-Arab conflicts like your border disagreement
At 06:37 PM 12/19/2003, you wrote:
In a message dated 12/19/2003 3:38:36 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Saddam was warned that if he took Kuwait, terrible consequences
might well follow.
That's bullshit. Saddam was told by our Chick ambassador (I can't remember
her name)
James A. Donald wrote:
Well if there is no legitimate authority, then state of nature applies.
Give him the justice that Mussolini and Ceasescu got. Hang him by his
feet from a lamp post in central Baghdad for his victims to use as
pinata
Bear in mind that we could probably find plenty of
I'm not certain, but I think there are some MS certified modems which have
a generalized A/D-D/A capability sufficient to handle voice.
They do. And I'm not so sure POTS is going to be where things will be the
most interesting...cable modem telephony might be where things get
interesting.
As
At 12:16 PM -0800 12/18/03, Jim Dixon wrote:
Voice telephony requires delays measured in tens of milliseconds. A bit
difficult if you also want encryption, anonymity, etc.
Voice memo (messaging) systems are a way around this limitation. I don't
know of any that exist. (Encrypted to
On 19 Dec 2003 at 11:00, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Let's face it: not even the Nazi war criminals were treated
in the way Saddam has been treated.
So far he's avoided being treated like Mussolini.
At 11:35 AM 12/19/2003 -0800, James A. Donald wrote:
Oh no, he got a shave and a dental examination, the
34 matches
Mail list logo
