Of course there are limits in regards to freedom of speech. They are as
follows:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,
or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to ass
Title: ::KAVKAZ CENTER::news::facts::analysis
How to help us Although our organization is based on a non-profit principle, we need money to implement and maintain our projects. We dependent on donations by those who share our concerns and want to help us with our work. Please support us with you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Major Variola ret) writes:
> Court Won't Hear Ariz. Gang Case
>
> By EUN-KYUNG KIM
> Associated Press Writer
>
> WASHINGTON (AP)--The Supreme Court refused to reverse an order Monday
> that released a man who was jailed for giving advice to members of an
> Arizona street gang.
>
Court Won't Hear Ariz. Gang Case
By EUN-KYUNG KIM
Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP)--The Supreme Court
refused to reverse an order Monday that
released a man who was jailed for giving
advic
No Banners Allowed On Overpasses
(Sacramento, CA) -- The California Department
Of Transportation has ordered the removal of
all flags and banners hung by residents from
freeway and highway overpasses. Several
flags and signs calling for peace were draped
from overpasses after last year's terr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Major Variola ret) writes:
> Background: its illegal to post campaign info within N metres of
> a polling booth. So what does this judge do? He requires election
> officials to post names of write-ins. Why? Because the incumbent is
> charged with pedo crimes, but still running.
"Major Variola (ret)" wrote:
>
> Justices Gut State's 'Son of Sam' Law
> By MAURA DOLAN, Times Staff Writer
...
> The unanimous decision, a victory for book publishers and the movie
> industry, found that the state's 16-year-old ban on profiteering from
> crime was overly broad and violated free-
Justices Gut State's 'Son of Sam' Law
By MAURA DOLAN, Times Staff Writer
SAN FRANCISCO -- The California Supreme Court on Thursday
struck down a state law that prohibits felons from cashing in on their
crime stories in a case that pitted freedom of speech against victims'
ri
On 14 Feb 2002, at 10:20, Sunder wrote:
> But wait, how about the mafia, they're a gang right? I wonder if well
> dressed mafiosos wear suits, ties, and dress shoes? and if on Friday's
> they wear khaki's and polo shirts...
>
> Well then in that case both the students and the teachers should
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Anonymous wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Major Variola ret) writes:
>
> > http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/kitv/20020206/lo/1070536_1.html
> >
> > KITV 4 News saw piercings, dyed hair and bare midriffs. However,
> > the school's written policy states the following are not allowed
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/kitv/20020206/lo/1070536_1.html
High School Faces Fight Over Satan Reference
Kaimuki High School's dress code came under fire Tuesday from a member
of the Church of Satan.
The dress code singles out clothing and accessories that promote
Satanism.
The head of Cit
"Nomen Nescio" wrote:
> Tim May writes:
> > Funny, I notice how many of the critics of Cypherpunks and
> supporters of
> > this express train approach to repealing the Bill of Rights are
> > themselves hiding behind Cypherpunks remailers, Hushmail aliases, and
> > Ziplip nyms.
>
> If you're
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Tim May wrote:
> No, I'm not "upset." I said it was "funny," as in "ironic."
Bull, your implication was they were hypocrites and cowards. Don't white
wash it.
> The main critics of anonymity are the main users here.
>
> Hilarious.
Actually it isn't. It's a perfect exampl
On Saturday, September 15, 2001, at 12:40 PM, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> Tim May writes:
>> Funny, I notice how many of the critics of Cypherpunks and supporters
>> of
>> this express train approach to repealing the Bill of Rights are
>> themselves hiding behind Cypherpunks remailers, Hushmail aliase
Tim May writes:
> Funny, I notice how many of the critics of Cypherpunks and supporters of
> this express train approach to repealing the Bill of Rights are
> themselves hiding behind Cypherpunks remailers, Hushmail aliases, and
> Ziplip nyms.
If you're upset that "critics of the Cypherpunks"
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> If you're upset that "critics of the Cypherpunks" are able to speak
> freely then you shouldn't have supported the technologies that enable
> them to do so. Free speech is for everyone, not just those who toe your
> line of violence and blood revenge.
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
> "Nomen Nescio" wrote:
>
> > Tim May writes:
> > > Funny, I notice how many of the critics of Cypherpunks and
> > supporters of
> > > this express train approach to repealing the Bill of Rights are
> > > themselves hiding behind Cypherpunks remaile
On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 11:41:52PM -0400, Bill Stewart wrote:
> It looks newspaperish, but doesn't indicate (AP) or (NYTimes) or whatever.
> If it's a newspaper that takes replying letters to the editor,
> or at least to the author, it deserves a reply.
According to Google, W. Wayt Gibbs <[EMAIL
>X-Loop: openpgp.net
>From: "mh mirror" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 2:52 PM
>Subject: [Freenet-chat] Others are protecting freedom of speech too.
>
>
>
>INTERNET_ANONYMITY
>
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
