This came in response to Cryptome's posting of Len Sassman's
comments on remailers.
-
From: S
Subject: Re: remailers-tla.htm Compromised Remailers, December 15, 2003
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:16:17 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for posting
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, John Young wrote:
This came in response to Cryptome's posting of Len Sassman's
comments on remailers.
(BTW, John -- while the threat originally started out as being about
compromised remailers, my comments had little to do with that title.
Perhaps remailer security would
Quoting Bill Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At 06:49 PM 12/13/2003 +0100, some provocateur claiming to be Anonymous
wrote:
A question for the moment might well be how many if any of
the remailers are operated by TLAs?
Remailers are secure if at least one remailer in a chain
is _not_
This came in response to Cryptome's posting of Len Sassman's
comments on remailers.
-
From: S
Subject: Re: remailers-tla.htm Compromised Remailers, December 15, 2003
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:16:17 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for posting
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, John Young wrote:
This came in response to Cryptome's posting of Len Sassman's
comments on remailers.
(BTW, John -- while the threat originally started out as being about
compromised remailers, my comments had little to do with that title.
Perhaps remailer security would
remailers. And if the TLAs are the dominant users of
remailers, sending dummy messages through, they get the same benefits
as when their are few users or compromised remailers. For example, if
the typical mix latency is 20 messages, and TLAs account for 98% of
the traffic through remailers
Quoting Bill Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At 06:49 PM 12/13/2003 +0100, some provocateur claiming to be Anonymous
wrote:
A question for the moment might well be how many if any of
the remailers are operated by TLAs?
Remailers are secure if at least one remailer in a chain
is _not_
At 06:49 PM 12/13/2003 +0100, some provocateur claiming to be Anonymous wrote:
A question for the moment might well be how many if any of
the remailers are operated by TLAs?
The TLAs have proposed running various anonymizers for China
and other countries that have oppressive eavesdroppers.
If
Tim May wrote:
I haven't carefully looked at the current source code (if it's
available) for things like Type II Mixmaster remailers, things which
offer reply-blocks.
The source is available for mixmaster. However, Type II does not offer
reply blocks.
Certainly for the canonical Cypherpunks
At 06:49 PM 12/13/2003 +0100, some provocateur claiming to be Anonymous wrote:
A question for the moment might well be how many if any of
the remailers are operated by TLAs?
The TLAs have proposed running various anonymizers for China
and other countries that have oppressive eavesdroppers.
If
between sent messages, received messages, and
actions take place. A signal recovery problem, perhaps akin to some
military sorts of problems.
(Note that this few users problem is essentially isomorphic to
compromised remailers. And if the TLAs are the dominant users of
remailers, sending dummy
11 matches
Mail list logo
