Re: Indo European Origins (language mutability, efficiency)

2003-01-14 Thread R. A. Hettinga
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At 2:56 PM -0800 on 1/14/03, Bill Stewart wrote: > And while some of the edges have been bashed off of irregular > verbs, if you'd a-been fixin' to talk about some verb forms being > simpler, you shouldn't'a started out pickin' Southern grammar as an

Re: Indo European Origins (language mutability, efficiency)

2003-01-14 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 02:48 PM 1/14/03 -0800, Michael Motyka wrote: >I guess bifurcation points and speciation seem very clear because of the aliasing >problems in our sampling methods. The speciation exists but is prolly ( probably ) often >fuzzier than we think. Almost everyone would say that an American Bison and

Re: Indo European Origins (language mutability, efficiency)

2003-01-14 Thread Bill Stewart
At 12:47 PM 01/14/2003 -0800, Major Variola (ret) wrote: Some of this is natural. I've adopted the southern "y'all" because English has no plural third person and this ambiguity is annoying when you're emailing to several people. Note also the efficiency of the contraction. "You" and "Y'all" a

Re: Indo European Origins (language mutability, efficiency)

2003-01-14 Thread Michael Motyka
"Major Variola (ret)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : >On Ken's >> > All contemporary natural languages, like all biological species, are >> > the same age. > >At first this parsed because I was thinking in the sense of >"all organisms have ancestries going back the same amount of >time". (And humans

Re: Indo European Origins (language mutability, efficiency)

2003-01-14 Thread Major Variola (ret)
On Ken's > > All contemporary natural languages, like all biological species, are > > the same age. At first this parsed because I was thinking in the sense of "all organisms have ancestries going back the same amount of time". (And humans aren't the 'goal' of evolution.) Not sure if non-biohea