a truck'
-TD
From: Steve Schear [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sunder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 22:11:42 -0800
At 07:42 AM 3/1/2004, sunder wrote:
Interesting.
I guess my basic question is, is there a subset of counter
At 06:50 AM 3/2/2004, Tyler Durden wrote:
How about a pseudo random conversation generator appliance for the
person trying to mask their speech. If it closely models the vocal tract,
language and language characteristics of the speaker it might be extremely
difficult to remove as background
a truck'
-TD
From: Steve Schear [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sunder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 22:11:42 -0800
At 07:42 AM 3/1/2004, sunder wrote:
Interesting.
I guess my basic question is, is there a subset of counter
At 06:50 AM 3/2/2004, Tyler Durden wrote:
How about a pseudo random conversation generator appliance for the
person trying to mask their speech. If it closely models the vocal tract,
language and language characteristics of the speaker it might be extremely
difficult to remove as background
Steve Furlong wrote:
On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 17:19, Major Variola (ret.) forwarded:
Blix says US spied on him over Iraq
...
It feels like an intrusion into
your integrity in a situation when you are actually on the same side.
Begging the question of whether Blix was actually on the same side
Interesting.
I guess my basic question is, is there a subset of counter-surveillance
actions that can be taken that, while not ensuring secure communications,
forces eavesdropping parties to take 'radical' measures in order to obtain
the desired information? In other words, if they have to
Tyler Durden wrote:
Interesting.
I guess my basic question is, is there a subset of counter-surveillance
actions that can be taken that, while not ensuring secure
communications, forces eavesdropping parties to take 'radical' measures
in order to obtain the desired information? In other words,
At 09:46 AM 3/1/04 -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
I guess my basic question is, is there a subset of counter-surveillance
actions that can be taken that, while not ensuring secure
communications,
forces eavesdropping parties to take 'radical' measures in order to
obtain
the desired information?
At 10:01 AM -0800 3/1/04, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
(What was that Brit town sacrificed so the Germans wouldn't know
the codes were broken? Starts with C...)
Coventry...
Ancient cathedral, etc...
Cheers,
RAH
--
-
R. A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Internet Bearer
...at the very
least, leaving the CD player in 'perpetual' mode can force some heavy human
investment in time and energy.
-TD
From: R. A. Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Major Variola (ret) [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Gentlemen reading mail part II
Major Variola (ret) (2004-03-01 18:01Z) wrote:
In order to avoid places with ears (and homeless people with
directional mics, see _Enemy of the State_) go to a park that you
haven't been to before. And perform the usual CI driving maneuvres
(see that Tomlinson book _The Big Breach_ for a
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 10:42, sunder wrote:
For example, one way to piss them off is to attempt to sing when you have
zero singing skills, and do it for hours on end, purposely off key, abusing
whatever instrument is available...
Ugh. I did _not_ want to think about Kofi Annan yodeling for
Justin says:
If they know you're trying to shake them, that alerts them and
eliminates any opportunity you might have otherwise had to feed them
misinformation in the future.
That's when you strap on the C-4 vest.
Zombie Monger
At 10:01 AM -0800 3/1/04, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
(What was that Brit town sacrificed so the Germans wouldn't know
the codes were broken? Starts with C...)
Coventry...
Ancient cathedral, etc...
Cheers,
RAH
--
-
R. A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Internet Bearer
Justin says:
If they know you're trying to shake them, that alerts them and
eliminates any opportunity you might have otherwise had to feed them
misinformation in the future.
That's when you strap on the C-4 vest.
Zombie Monger
On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 17:19, Major Variola (ret.) forwarded:
Blix says US spied on him over Iraq
...
It feels like an intrusion into
your integrity in a situation when you are actually on the same side.
Begging the question of whether Blix was actually on the same side as
the Brits or the
At 09:16 PM 2/29/04 -0500, Steve Furlong wrote:
On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 17:19, Major Variola (ret.) forwarded:
Blix says US spied on him over Iraq
...
It feels like an intrusion into
your integrity in a situation when you are actually on the same
side.
Begging the question of whether Blix was
17 matches
Mail list logo
