RE: Max's Lesson (was Re: [osint] Martha's lesson - don't talk to the FBI)

"In fact, a *moral* argument can be made that restraint of that information is more fraud than trading on that information to begin with. Morally -- if morality caused markets and not the other way around :-) -- "insiders" should be *obligated* to trade on "inside" information as soon as they beli

Re: Max's Lesson (was Re: [osint] Martha's lesson - don't talk to the FBI)

[snide preposterous presumptions deleted to save space] In response to "R. A. Hettinga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I did not in any way or form, either explicitly much less implicitly, make any claim for the expropriation of money from wealthy persons in any form, much less by the state. Much as you

Re: Max's Lesson (was Re: [osint] Martha's lesson - don't talk to the FBI)

talism I think most Cypherpunks espouse. -TD From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Max's Lesson (was Re: [osint] Martha's lesson - don't talk to the FBI) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 21:30:17 -0500 [snide preposterous presumptions deleted to save space] In respo

Re: Max's Lesson (was Re: [osint] Martha's lesson - don't talk to the FBI)

At 9:30 PM -0500 3/24/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >JUSTICE? Yawn. Plonk... Cheers, RAH -- - R. A. Hettinga The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and a