Re: lawyer physics (was taxing satellites)

2001-07-17 Thread Ken Brown
> More importantly: you can't get sued if your space debris trashes someone > else's mission. A piece of law that will have to be re-assessed if there ever are any space colonists, or serious productive industry in LEO. You really wouldn't want to live somewhere where anyone who "accidentally"

RE: lawyer physics (was taxing satellites)

2001-07-10 Thread Jim Windle
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 16:05:44 Phillip H. Zakas wrote: > > >you know one of the things i'd like to do is go into the waste removal >business in orbit. lots of junk up there...would like to launch a satellite >with a long finger attached to it and poke stuff out of orbit. the "nudge". >who'd pay?

RE: lawyer physics (was taxing satellites)

2001-07-10 Thread Sandy Sandfort
Peter Trei wrote: > Expatriate US citizens have to pay > income tax on foreign earned income > to the US...If you don't pay up, > they might not be able to extradite > you if you're now a foreigner, but > they'll go after your assets in the > US, or arrest you if you set foot > on US soil. > > (1

Re: lawyer physics (was taxing satellites)

2001-07-10 Thread Harmon Seaver
Kalifornica charges property taxes on live-aboard boats which haven't been in their waters or registered in their state for years -- or tries to, on the basis that the owner *used* to live there, even if his current residence if elsewhere. Or so people on the boating lists complain. -- Harmon

RE: lawyer physics (was taxing satellites)

2001-07-10 Thread Phillip H. Zakas
r' > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: lawyer physics (was taxing satellites) > > > > > -- > > From: Trei, Peter > > Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 3:05 PM > > To: 'Ray Dillinger

RE: lawyer physics (was taxing satellites)

2001-07-10 Thread Trei, Peter
> -- > From: Trei, Peter > Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 3:05 PM > To: 'Ray Dillinger' > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: lawyer physics (was taxing satellites) > > > > > -- > > From:

RE: lawyer physics (was taxing satellites)

2001-07-10 Thread Trei, Peter
> -- > From: Trei, Peter > Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 3:05 PM > To: 'Ray Dillinger' > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: lawyer physics (was taxing satellites) > > > > > -- > > From:

RE: lawyer physics (was taxing satellites)

2001-07-10 Thread Trei, Peter
> -- > From: Ray Dillinger[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 2:36 PM > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: lawyer physics (was taxing satellites) > > > > On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Dynamite Bob wrote: > > &

RE: lawyer physics (was taxing satellites)

2001-07-10 Thread Trei, Peter
> -- > From: Ray Dillinger[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 2:36 PM > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: lawyer physics (was taxing satellites) > > > > On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Dynamite Bob wrote: > > &

RE: lawyer physics (was taxing satellites)

2001-07-10 Thread Sandy Sandfort
Ray Dillinger wrote: > Now, if Sri Lanka wanted to charge > property taxes for some prime > orbital real estate, it might be > able to make a better case -- it > actually *has* prime orbital real > estate. Only in Arthur C. Clarks science fiction. The equator does not cross Sri Lanka. Now Ecua

RE: lawyer physics (was taxing satellites)

2001-07-10 Thread Sandy Sandfort
"Dynamite Bob" wrote: > Get a load of this lawyer's physics: > > "Geostationary satellites sit above > the equator in a fixed position; > they do not rotate around the Earth. Maybe he was making a very sophisticated argument about "frame of reference" (or maybe not). :-D S a n d y So the tr

Re: lawyer physics (was taxing satellites)

2001-07-10 Thread Ray Dillinger
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Dynamite Bob wrote: >"The property in question here is geostationary," >said Larry Hoenig, a San Francisco attorney >representing Hughes Electronics. "Geostationary >satellites sit above the equator in a fixed >position; they do not rotate around the Earth. So >the satell