On Sat, 17 Nov 2001, David Honig wrote:
At 10:57 AM 11/17/01 -0800, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
Airport chemical sniffers apparently look for the signature of nitrogen
compounds, not explosives, per se. I've often wondered how many weekend
Unless they look for nitrogen in bulk of the specimen
At 11:51 AM 11/18/01 +0100, Eugene Leitl wrote:
gardeners have gotten hassled and delayed because of trace amounts of
ammonia-based fertilizers on their person and effects. If you plan to
fly,
Salts are different from traces of uncombusted nitrocellulose deposited on
any surface of a nearby
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: Monkeywrenching airport security
Walk into an airport in baggy pants with
powdered expolosives in a leg bag which
can slowly be dispersed as you walk...
Airport chemical sniffers apparently look for the signature of nitrogen
compounds, not explosives, per
--
On 16 Nov 2001, at 16:50, Aimee Farr wrote:
I meant it in the sense that it sounds like they are
talking about criminal defense lawyers.
(i.e., make numerous references to the US Constitution,
defenders, etc-etc.)
Criminal defense has already been criminalized in hard to
enforce
How useful. That'll really, I mean REALLY show 'em who's boss, as they shut the
airport down and strand thousands of hapless travelers who I am sure will really
understand your idiotic point. Which is ... ?
Shit, all it takes is for you to put on some sneakers, run rapidly past the security
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 10:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Monkeywrenching airport security
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: Monkeywrenching airport security
Walk into an airport in baggy pants with
powdered expolosives in a leg bag which
can slowly
At 10:57 AM 11/17/01 -0800, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
Airport chemical sniffers apparently look for the signature of nitrogen
compounds, not explosives, per se. I've often wondered how many weekend
gardeners have gotten hassled and delayed because of trace amounts of
ammonia-based fertilizers on
McCullagh; Aimee Farr
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Monkeywrenching
--
On 16 Nov 2001, at 16:50, Aimee Farr wrote:
I meant it in the sense that it sounds like they are
talking about criminal defense lawyers.
(i.e., make numerous references to the US Constitution,
defenders
I am no longer on the list. My Policeman Inside broke out. He won't let me
be associated with silly salad talk, mission orientation, and Levi-Smithing.
You need to build an inner jail for your inner policeman! But to make
sure that he has due process, you need an inner internal affairs
On Saturday, November 17, 2001, at 05:41 PM, David Honig wrote:
At 10:57 AM 11/17/01 -0800, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
Airport chemical sniffers apparently look for the signature of
nitrogen
compounds, not explosives, per se. I've often wondered how many
weekend
gardeners have gotten hassled
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aimee wrote:
I am no longer on the list. My Policeman Inside broke out. He won't let me
be associated with silly salad talk, mission orientation, and Levi-Smithing.
You need to build an inner jail for your inner policeman! But to make
sure that
I called the FBI yesterday; this is a real flyer. I'll send something
Politechwards later on today about it.
-Declan
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 12:00:50PM -0600, Aimee Farr wrote:
A good example of monkeywrenching can be found at the article posted
earlier,
[up-posted conversation]
You are working too hard today.
I meant it in the sense that it sounds like they are talking about criminal
defense lawyers.
(i.e., make numerous references to the US Constitution, defenders,
etc-etc.)
:P
~Aimee
I called the FBI yesterday; this is a real flyer.
Second, training in such matters would be useless and counterproductive.
There is no point in patriotic Americans learning to use weapons and
explosives for the purpose of terrorism. Any attempt to use such tools
would injure or kill people and lead to an even greater loss of our
Fuck you, pig.
14 matches
Mail list logo
