SPAM from me? SPAM von uns?

2005-10-13 Thread info
Deutscher Text folgt unten. --English-- We do not dispatch Spam! To 12.10.2005 an unknown quantity penetrated in our Mailserver over a system account and dispatched enamels to 60.000 receivers. The break-down succeeded over trying different passwords out. Do not have we simple passwords in

Re: [linux-elitists] Re: MCI boots send-safe (Register) -- adds a net of 11 more spam hosts (fwd from kmself@ix.netcom.com)

2005-03-08 Thread Eugen Leitl
- Forwarded message from "Karsten M. Self" - From: "Karsten M. Self" Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:24:55 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [linux-elitists] Re: MCI boots send-safe (Register) -- adds a net of 11 more spam hosts User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040

Spam gets vocal with VoIP

2005-02-18 Thread R.A. Hettinga
<http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/02/17/spam_gets_vocal_with_voip/print.html> The Register Biting the hand that feeds IT Spam gets vocal with VoIP By John Leyden (john.leyden at theregister.co.uk) Published Thursday 17th February 2005 08:47 GMT RSA 2005 We're all learning to liv

Malware, spam prompts mass net turn off

2005-02-17 Thread R.A. Hettinga
<http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/01/14/malware_mass_net_turn_off/print.html> The Register Biting the hand that feeds IT The Register » Internet and Law » eCommerce » Original URL: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/01/14/malware_mass_net_turn_off/ Malware, spam prompts mass net tu

Protect Your In-Box From Spam

2004-12-08 Thread Robin
 <---Click   Stop Spam Once and for all!   Eliminates porn too!     Want out of our database? Do not reply to this email.   Copy and paste this link into your browser -   blocjunk.com/rmm.htm   Computer Technologies 848 N. Rainbow Blvd. #316Las Vegas, NV 89

Protect Your In-Box From Spam

2004-12-08 Thread Robin
 <---Click   Stop Spam Once and for all!   Eliminates porn too!     Want out of our database? Do not reply to this email.   Copy and paste this link into your browser -   blocjunk.com/rmm.htm   Computer Technologies 848 N. Rainbow Blvd. #316Las Vegas, NV 89

Get Rid of All Spam.

2004-12-04 Thread Brook
 <---Click   Stop Spam Once and for all!   Eliminates porn too!     Want out of our database? Do not reply to this email.   Copy and paste this link into your browser -   blocjunk.com/rmm.htm   Computer Technologies 848 N. Rainbow Blvd. #316Las Vegas, NV 89

Get Rid of All Spam.

2004-12-04 Thread Brook
 <---Click   Stop Spam Once and for all!   Eliminates porn too!     Want out of our database? Do not reply to this email.   Copy and paste this link into your browser -   blocjunk.com/rmm.htm   Computer Technologies 848 N. Rainbow Blvd. #316Las Vegas, NV 89

Get Rid of All Spam.

2004-12-03 Thread Anderson
 <---Click   Stop Spam Once and for all!   Eliminates porn too!     Want out of our database? Do not reply to this email.   Copy and paste this link into your browser -   blocjunk.com/rmm.htm   Computer Technologies 848 N. Rainbow Blvd. #316Las Vegas, NV 89

Get Rid of All Spam.

2004-12-02 Thread Christopher
 <---Click   Stop Spam Once and for all!   Eliminates porn too!     Want out of our database? Do not reply to this email.   Copy and paste this link into your browser -   blocjunk.com/rmm.htm   Computer Technologies 848 N. Rainbow Blvd. #316Las Vegas, NV 89

Get Rid of All Spam.

2004-12-02 Thread Christopher
 <---Click   Stop Spam Once and for all!   Eliminates porn too!     Want out of our database? Do not reply to this email.   Copy and paste this link into your browser -   blocjunk.com/rmm.htm   Computer Technologies 848 N. Rainbow Blvd. #316Las Vegas, NV 89

Get Rid of All Spam.

2004-11-30 Thread Charles
 <---Click   Stop Spam Once and for all!   Eliminates porn too!     Want out of our database? Do not reply to this email.   Copy and paste this link into your browser -   mail-svcs.com/rmm.htm   Computer Technologies 848 N. Rainbow Blvd. #316Las Vegas, NV 89

Get Rid of All Spam.

2004-11-29 Thread Charles
 <---Click   Stop Spam Once and for all!   Eliminates porn too!     Want out of our database? Do not reply to this email.   Copy and paste this link into your browser -   mail-svcs.com/rmm.htm   Computer Technologies 848 N. Rainbow Blvd. #316Las Vegas, NV 89

Lycos screensaver to blitz spam servers

2004-11-29 Thread R.A. Hettinga
<http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/11/26/lycos_europe_spam_blitz/print.html> The Register Biting the hand that feeds IT Original URL: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/11/26/lycos_europe_spam_blitz/ Lycos screensaver to blitz spam servers By Jan Libbenga (libbenga at yahoo.com) Pub

Best Spam Blocker Available

2004-11-23 Thread Clark
 <---Click   Stop Spam Once and for all!   Eliminates porn too!     Want out of our database? Do not reply to this email.   Copy and paste this link into your browser -   mail-svcs.com/rmm.htm   Computer Technologies 848 N. Rainbow Blvd. #316Las Vegas, NV 89

Re: E-Mail Authentication Will Not End Spam, Panelists Say

2004-11-22 Thread Chris Palmer
s just moved on to > insecure client machines. The proper route to control spam is to > involve users in prioritizing their email, so that their friend's > email comes first, followed by anybody they've sent mail to, followed > by people they've gotten email from before, fo

Re: E-Mail Authentication Will Not End Spam, Panelists Say

2004-11-21 Thread Hadmut Danisch
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 04:20:59PM -0500, R.A. Hettinga wrote: > > Still, panelists insisted authentication is a vital first step. After that, > they said, could come a system that evaluates the "reputation" of senders, > perhaps using a process that marks good e-mail with an electronic seal of >

Re: E-Mail Authentication Will Not End Spam, Panelists Say

2004-11-19 Thread R.A. Hettinga
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At 11:19 AM -0500 11/19/04, Russell Nelson wrote: >Anybody can pay to send email right now. :-). Of course, I'm talking about something like postage, at the $MTP level. Again, forget it. Cheers, RAH - -- - - R. A. Hettinga The In

Re: E-Mail Authentication Will Not End Spam, Panelists Say

2004-11-19 Thread Russell Nelson
R.A. Hettinga writes: > >mail, followed by email from strangers (which is where all the spam > >is). > > A whitelist for my friends, all others pay... > > oh, forget it. Anybody can pay to send email right now. You just go to paypal, type in the person's ema

Undeliverable: KCO SPAM? Hi Tolbert

2004-11-19 Thread System Administrator
Your message To: Tolbert Subject: KCO SPAM? Hi Tolbert Sent:Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:48:42 -0500 did not reach the following recipient(s): Tolbert on Fri, 19 Nov 2004 03:38:37 -0500 The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p

Re: E-Mail Authentication Will Not End Spam, Panelists Say

2004-11-18 Thread R.A. Hettinga
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At 9:15 PM -0500 11/18/04, Russell Nelson wrote: >The proper route to control spam is to >involve users in prioritizing their email, so that their friend's >email comes first, followed by anybody they've sent mail to, followed

Re: E-Mail Authentication Will Not End Spam, Panelists Say

2004-11-18 Thread Russell Nelson
fucking* pain in the ass), but he is correct. ALL of the effort spent to secure open relays was basically wasted effort, because spammers just moved on to insecure client machines. The proper route to control spam is to involve users in prioritizing their email, so that their friend's email come

Re: E-Mail Authentication Will Not End Spam, Panelists Say

2004-11-11 Thread Damian Gerow
verify senders of e-mail. : : In theory, such an authentication system would make it harder for spammers : to disguise their identities and locations in an attempt to avoid being : shut down or prosecuted. (Having watched the IETF group for a while, and spent much time fighting spam...) No person

E-Mail Authentication Will Not End Spam, Panelists Say

2004-11-11 Thread R.A. Hettinga
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A41460-2004Nov10?language=printer> The Washington Post washingtonpost.com E-Mail Authentication Will Not End Spam, Panelists Say By Jonathan Krim Washington Post Staff Writer Thursday, November 11, 2004; Page E01 For consumers and busi

Stop the Porn. Stop Spam.

2004-11-06 Thread Andy
 <---Click   Stop Spam Once and for all!   Eliminates porn too!     Want out of our database? Do not reply to this email.   Copy and paste this link into your browser -   mail-svcs.com/rmm.htm   Computer Technologies 848 N. Rainbow Blvd. #316Las Vegas, NV 89

Stop the Porn. Stop Spam.

2004-11-06 Thread Andy
 <---Click   Stop Spam Once and for all!   Eliminates porn too!     Want out of our database? Do not reply to this email.   Copy and paste this link into your browser -   mail-svcs.com/rmm.htm   Computer Technologies 848 N. Rainbow Blvd. #316Las Vegas, NV 89

When spam is overwhelming and what to do about it...

2004-10-04 Thread Phillip
  Want out of our database? Do not reply to this email.   Copy and paste this link into your browser -   rem0925.biz/rmm.htm     Sponsored by   Previ.a M.arketing848 N. Rainbow Blvd.Las Vegas, NV 89107 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 --=_NextPart_000_0006_01C4A85C.DC5D5BE0--

The only smart way to control spam

2004-10-02 Thread Randy
  Want out of our database? Do not reply to this email.   Copy and paste this link into your browser -   rem0925.biz/rmm.htm     Sponsored by   Previ.a M.arketing848 N. Rainbow Blvd.Las Vegas, NV 89107 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 --=_NextPart_000_0006_01C4A85C.DC5D5BE0--

Re: Spam Spotlight on Reputation

2004-09-14 Thread Bill Stewart
e the stuff, and the worst would be quasi-spam like Yet Another Invitation to some crypto-industry marketroid's seminar. It might be a rant from Detweiler or some other cypherpunk that you bozofilter, but at least that was a job for your email program to sort out, not your first-tier spamfilte

Re: Spam Spotlight on Reputation

2004-09-13 Thread R. A. Hettinga
At 1:33 PM +0100 9/13/04, Ben Laurie wrote: >Surely you should check that: > >a) The signature works >b) Is someone in your list of good keys > >before whitelisting? Amen. A (cryptographic) whitelist for my friends, all others pay cash. :-) Cheers, RAH -- - R. A. Hettinga The

Re: Spam Spotlight on Reputation

2004-09-13 Thread Ben Laurie
Bill Stewart wrote: At 03:15 PM 9/6/2004, Hadmut Danisch wrote: On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 11:52:03AM -0600, R. A. Hettinga wrote: > > E-mail security company MX Logic Inc. will report this week that 10 percent > of all spam includes such SPF records, I have mentioned this problem more th

Re: Spam Spotlight on Reputation

2004-09-08 Thread Bill Stewart
At 03:15 PM 9/6/2004, Hadmut Danisch wrote: On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 11:52:03AM -0600, R. A. Hettinga wrote: > > E-mail security company MX Logic Inc. will report this week that 10 percent > of all spam includes such SPF records, I have mentioned this problem more than a year ago in cont

Re: Spam Spotlight on Reputation

2004-09-06 Thread Hadmut Danisch
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 11:52:03AM -0600, R. A. Hettinga wrote: > > E-mail security company MX Logic Inc. will report this week that 10 percent > of all spam includes such SPF records, I have mentioned this problem more than a year ago in context of my RMX draft (SPF, CallerID and Sen

Spam Spotlight on Reputation

2004-09-06 Thread R. A. Hettinga
<http://www.eweek.com/print_article/0,1761,a=134748,00.asp> EWeek Spam Spotlight on Reputation Spam Spotlight on Reputation September 6, 2004 By Dennis Callaghan As enterprises continue to register Sender Protection Framework records, hoping to thwart spam and phishing a

Undeliverable: [SPAM] 81% - [VIRUS] Site changes

2004-08-31 Thread System Administrator
Your message To: Hkhenson Subject: [SPAM] 81% - [VIRUS] Site changes Sent:Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:17:22 -0400 did not reach the following recipient(s): c=CA;a= ;p=Cogeco;o=Ontario;dda:[EMAIL PROTECTED]; on Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:19:07 -0400 The recipient name is not recognized

Internet providers test ways to outsmart spam

2004-07-24 Thread R. A. Hettinga
/pg/pp/04207/350858.stm> Internet providers test ways to outsmart spam Sunday, July 25, 2004 By Chris Gaither, Los Angeles Times Be liberal in what you accept and conservative in what you send. That was the philosophy when computer scientists sent the first electronic-mail messages over the I

Re: VeriSign service takes on spam

2004-06-29 Thread J.A. Terranson
Oh, the irony! A spammer selling anti-spam services! //Alif On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, R. A. Hettinga wrote: > Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:56:28 -0400 > From: R. A. Hettinga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: VeriSign service takes on spam &g

VeriSign service takes on spam

2004-06-29 Thread R. A. Hettinga
...A whitelist for my friends... Cheers, RAH --- <http://news.com.com/2102-7355_3-5250010.html?tag=st.util.print> CNET News VeriSign service takes on spam By Dinesh C. Sharma Special to CNET News.com http://news.com.com/2100-7355-5250010.html Story last modified June 28, 2004

Spam sender sentenced in Russia for the first time

2004-06-25 Thread R. A. Hettinga
<http://english.pravda.ru/printed.html?news_id=13170> Spam sender sentenced in Russia for the first time - 06/23/2004 19:32 On June 22 student Dmitry Anosov from the city of Chelybinsk was sentenced forcreating software causing uncontrolled blocking computers and copying information?.

When spam is overwhelming and what to do about it...

2004-06-08 Thread Cherie
Title: Important Info Hello, how are you doing? Better than all other Spam filters - Only Delivers The Email You Want! This is the ultimate solution that is guaranteed to stop all spam without losing any of your important email! This system protects you 100%. We didn't believe it e

Undeliverable: SPAM: Re: My ordered Adult movies - 8973 Beltran : 876

2004-06-05 Thread System Administrator
Your message To: Beltran Subject: SPAM: Re: My ordered Adult movies - 8973 Beltran : 876 Sent:Sun, 6 Jun 2004 01:15:11 -0400 did not reach the following recipient(s): Beltran on Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:55:13 -0400 The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the

Undeliverable: Spam: Re: Hi there Mickeyv

2004-05-28 Thread System Administrator
Your message To: Mickeyv Subject: Spam: Re: Hi there Mickeyv Sent:Fri, 28 May 2004 17:48:53 -0600 did not reach the following recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:52 -0600 The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is

Spam Arrest Verification Confirmation

2004-05-26 Thread support
Thank you for verifying your email address with Spam Arrest! Your email has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s inbox. All of your future emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will also be delivered directly into their inbox. You can protect your own email account using Spam Arrest. P

Virus detected in: [Spam?] Re: Document

2004-05-23 Thread interner-SMTP-Backbone-Service
Scenarios/Undefined/F-Secure Anti-Virus: Error 0xc2060a08, W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED], F-Secure Orion, W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Die E-Mail von [EMAIL PROTECTED] an [EMAIL PROTECTED] enthielt einen Computer Virus. Eine Zustellung erfolgt nicht. Bitte lassen Sie umgehend ihr Computer-System pruefen! Me

[Politech] Here's someone who actually likes political spam [sp]

2004-05-19 Thread R. A. Hettinga
--- begin forwarded text Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 22:31:27 -0400 From: Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Macintosh/20040502) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Politech] Here's someone who actually likes political spa

Re: Reusable hashcash for spam prevention

2004-05-18 Thread R. A. Hettinga
--- begin forwarded text Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 14:41:16 +0100 To: "R. A. Hettinga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Fearghas McKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Reusable hashcash for spam prevention Cc: Richard Clayton <[EM

Re: Reusable hashcash for spam prevention

2004-05-18 Thread R. A. Hettinga
--- begin forwarded text Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 14:41:31 +0100 To: "R. A. Hettinga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Fearghas McKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Reusable hashcash for spam prevention Cc: Richard Clayton <[EMAIL

Reusable hashcash for spam prevention

2004-05-17 Thread Anonymous
anti-spam measure. The idea is that to send email, the sender has to create a "proof of work" token, something which takes a relatively long time to compute but which can be checked quickly. The simplest proposal is a hash collision, as suggested by Adam Back at http://www.hashcash.o

The smart way to control spam

2004-05-05 Thread Gail
Title: Important Info How are you doing? Better than all other Spam filters - Only Delivers The Email You Want! This is the ultimate solution that is guaranteed to stop all spam without losing any of your important email! This system protects you 100%. We didn't believe it either unt

Smart spam control ends junk mail problem

2004-05-05 Thread Katherine
Title: Important Info How's it going? Better than all other Spam filters - Only Delivers The Email You Want! This is the ultimate solution that is guaranteed to stop all spam without losing any of your important email! This system protects you 100%. We didn't believe it eithe

E-mail lists choke on spam

2004-04-17 Thread R. A. Hettinga
<http://news.com.com/2102-1038_3-5190826.html?tag=st.util.print> CNET News http://www.news.com/ E-mail lists choke on spam By John Borland Staff Writer, CNET News.com http://news.com.com/2100-1038-5190826.html Story last modified April 13, 2004, 1:36 PM PDT For close to

Spam Arrest Verification Confirmation

2004-03-10 Thread support
Thank you for verifying your email address with Spam Arrest! Your email has been forwarded to Peter D. Marshall's inbox. All of your future emails to Peter D. Marshall will also be delivered directly into their inbox. You can protect your own email account using Spam Arrest. P

Spam Arrest Verification Confirmation

2004-02-29 Thread support
Thank you for verifying your email address with Spam Arrest! Your email has been forwarded to Mark Tucci - Custom Blends's inbox. All of your future emails to Mark Tucci - Custom Blends will also be delivered directly into their inbox. You can protect your own email account using

Spam mail warning notification! (Attachment Removal)

2004-02-01 Thread webshield
eManager Notification * The following mail was blocked since it contains sensitive content. Source mailbox: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED] Policy: Attachment Removal Attachment file name: document.zip - application/octet-stream Acti

Spam mail warning notification! (Attachment Removal)

2004-01-31 Thread webshield
eManager Notification * The following mail was blocked since it contains sensitive content. Source mailbox: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED] Policy: Attachment Removal Attachment file name: test.pif - application/octet-stream Action:

Re: all the viruses, spam and bounces that are all I get from this list at the moment

2004-01-30 Thread Riad S. Wahby
Dave Howe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bah, I really miss the crap-filtered version of cypherpunks > can anyone recommend a better node than the one I am using now? Well, you might consider me slightly biased (since I run the node), but I recommend [EMAIL PROTECTED] Filtered in essentially the sa

Re: all the viruses, spam and bounces that are all I get from this list at the moment

2004-01-30 Thread Dave Howe
Bah, I really miss the crap-filtered version of cypherpunks can anyone recommend a better node than the one I am using now?

Undeliverable: Spam Suspected:

2004-01-27 Thread System Administrator
Your message To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Spam Suspected: Sent:Tue, 27 Jan 2004 06:03:48 -0800 did not reach the following recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:22:19 -0800 The maximum time for delivering the message expired The MTS-ID of the

Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project

2004-01-02 Thread Seth David Schoen
Eric S. Johansson writes: > Ben Laurie wrote: > > >Richard Clayton wrote: > > > >>and in these schemes, where does our esteemed moderator get _his_ stamps > >>from ? remember that not all bulk email is spam by any means... or do > >>we end up with w

Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project

2004-01-01 Thread James A. Donald
-- Alan Brown wrote: > > I just hope you're right > > about the CPUs burning up - it doesn't happen when machines > > are running OGR calculations, so I suspect that you just > > ran into a particularly badly built example. Eric S. Johansson > no, it was a stock Intel motherboard, CPU, CPU

Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project

2004-01-01 Thread Eric S. Johansson
Alan Brown wrote: They are currently tracking around 1.5 million compromised machines. *ouch*. on 24x7 both power and connectivity? The Swen and blaster worms install various spamware and backdoors. These have been estimated to have infected millions of machines worldwide and later versions remo

Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project

2004-01-01 Thread Alan Brown
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004, Eric S. Johansson wrote: > > the easynet.nl list (recently demised) listed nearly 700K machines that > > had been detected (allegedly) sending spam... so since their detection > > was not universal it would certainly be more than 700K :( > > that is a

Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project

2004-01-01 Thread Eric S. Johansson
Richard Clayton wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Eric S. Johansson wrote: But using your spam size, , the slowdown factor becomes roughly 73 times. So they would need 73 machines running full tilt all the time to regain their old throughput. Believe me

Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project

2004-01-01 Thread Alan Brown
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Bill Stewart wrote: > The reason it's partly a cryptographic problem is forgeries. > Once everybody starts whitelisting, spammers are going to > start forging headers to pretend to come from big mailing lists > and popular machines and authors, so now you'll not only > need to

Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project

2003-12-31 Thread John Kelsey
resources to transmit one more e-mail is *really* small. The cost I care about is my time, specifically my time spent leafing through my likely-spam folder checking to see if someone I actually want to hear from sent me something worth seeing. (This is a hassle, because sometimes people e-

Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project

2003-12-31 Thread Eric S. Johansson
Ben Laurie wrote: Richard Clayton wrote: and in these schemes, where does our esteemed moderator get _his_ stamps from ? remember that not all bulk email is spam by any means... or do we end up with whitelists all over the place and the focus of attacks moves to the ingress to the mailing lists

Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project

2003-12-31 Thread Ben Laurie
Richard Clayton wrote: and in these schemes, where does our esteemed moderator get _his_ stamps from ? remember that not all bulk email is spam by any means... or do we end up with whitelists all over the place and the focus of attacks moves to the ingress to the mailing lists :( He uses the

Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project

2003-12-30 Thread Tim May
t; [what about mailing lists] Obviously you'd have to whitelist anybody's list you're joining if you don't want your spam filters to robo-discard it. I never understand why people think spam is a technical problem :( let alone a cryptographic one :-( The reason it's partly a c

Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project

2003-12-30 Thread Bill Stewart
At 07:46 PM 12/30/2003 +, Richard Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [what about mailing lists] Obviously you'd have to whitelist anybody's list you're joining if you don't want your spam filters to robo-discard it. I never understand why people think spam

Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project

2003-12-30 Thread Tim May
On Dec 30, 2003, at 1:01 PM, R. A. Hettinga wrote: At 7:46 PM + 12/30/03, Richard Clayton wrote: where does our esteemed moderator get _his_ stamps from ? A whitelist for my friends, etc... We're not moderated. Get used to it. Or are people _again_ spamming the Cypherpunks list with crap f

Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project

2003-12-30 Thread R. A. Hettinga
At 7:46 PM + 12/30/03, Richard Clayton wrote: >where does our esteemed moderator get _his_ stamps >from ? A whitelist for my friends, etc... Whitelist [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheers, RAH -- - R. A. Hettinga The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation 44 F

Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project

2003-12-30 Thread Richard Clayton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Eric S. Johansson wrote: > >> But using your spam size, , the slowdown factor becomes roughly >> 73 times. So they would need 73 machines running full tilt all the time >> to regain their old throug

Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project

2003-12-30 Thread Jerrold Leichter
(The use of memory speed leads to an interesting notion: Functions that are designed to be differentially expensive on different kinds of fielded hardware. On a theoretical basis, of course, all hardware is interchangeable; but in practice, something differentially expensive to calculate on an x86

Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project

2003-12-30 Thread Alan Brown
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Eric S. Johansson wrote: > But using your spam size, , the slowdown factor becomes roughly > 73 times. So they would need 73 machines running full tilt all the time > to regain their old throughput. Believe me, the professionals have enough 0wned machines tha

Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project

2003-12-30 Thread Eric S. Johansson
Scott Nelson wrote: d*b --- s where: d = stamp delay in seconds s = spam size in bytes b = bandwidth in bytes per second I don't understand this equation at all. It's the rate limiting factor that counts, not a combination of stamp speed + bandwidth. well, stamp speed is

Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project

2003-12-29 Thread Scott Nelson
gt;> >> Once nice thing about memory-bound functions is that, >> while spammers could build custom hardware farms in Florida or China, >> a large amount of spam is delivered by hijacked PCs or abused >> relays/proxies, >> which run on standard PC hardware, not cus

Re: [camram-spam] Re: Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project

2003-12-29 Thread Eric S. Johansson
vulnerable to hardware attack because you could in their view build cheaper hardware more [] Once nice thing about memory-bound functions is that, while spammers could build custom hardware farms in Florida or China, a large amount of spam is delivered by hijacked PCs or abused relays/proxies, which

RE: [Asrg] Re: [Politech] Congress finally poised to vote on anti -spam bill [sp]

2003-11-27 Thread Hallam-Baker, Phillip
> Do you have any more details on this for those who don't > normally follow DNSSEC? It is a sad story. Politics and the magic circle. If people are wondering why the major industry players have abandoned the IETF read on. This is only one example of the type, other companies have similar issues.

RE: [Asrg] Re: [Politech] Congress finally poised to vote on anti -spam bill [sp]

2003-11-27 Thread Peter Gutmann
"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >DNSSEC is not happening, blame Randy Bush and the IESG for refusing the >working group consensus and imposing their own idea that cannot be deployed. >An experimental protocol that increases the volume of data in the .com zone >by an order of ma

RE: [Asrg] Re: [Politech] Congress finally poised to vote on anti -spam bill [sp]

2003-11-25 Thread Hallam-Baker, Phillip
st of all the zones which contain a 'do not spam' TXT property record. This has the secondary advantage that it is not necessary to actualy consult the list, the authoritative information is in DNS. > There's a scalability problem that has to be solved, > which is how

Fwd: Cypherpunks,Get Rid of SPAM for GOOD jdbsfwtl f

2003-11-22 Thread Jole
No more spam.We can help you! momnh

Cpunks Fwd: STOP SPAM & ADULT EMAIL fxzxp osubcftkwhfrt

2003-11-22 Thread Tyree Langston
Cpunks0bgbl pkdcuzc Cpunks STOP SPAM IN ITS TRACKS! Do you get junk, scams and worse in your inbox every day? Are you sick of spending valuable time removing the trash? Is your child receiving inappropriate adult material? If so you should know that no other solution works better then our

Fwd: Get Rid of SPAM for GOOD

2003-11-22 Thread Robby Camacho
Hello, This program worked for me. If you hate Spam like I do, you owe it to your self to try this program, and forward this email to all of your friends which also hate Spam or as many people possible. Together lets help clear the Internet of Spam

RE: [Asrg] Re: [Politech] Congress finally poised to vote on anti -spam bill [sp]

2003-11-21 Thread Hallam-Baker, Phillip
TED] > Subject: RE: [Asrg] Re: [Politech] Congress finally poised to vote on > anti -spam bill [sp] > > > We need to consider the technical workings of the do-not-spam > list and the > requirements that we would like the FTC to meet. > > I propose as a minimum: >

RE: [Asrg] Re: [Politech] Congress finally poised to vote on anti -spam bill [sp]

2003-11-21 Thread Hallam-Baker, Phillip
We need to consider the technical workings of the do-not-spam list and the requirements that we would like the FTC to meet. I propose as a minimum: 1) Allow individual subscribers to list their email addresses with the service. 2) Permit mail sender to quickly determine whether a given email is

Re: [Politech] Congress finally poised to vote on anti-spam bill [sp]

2003-11-21 Thread Steve Schear
At 04:13 PM 11/21/2003 -0600, Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A copy of the bill is here: http://news.com.com/pdf/ne/2003/FINALSPAM.pdf I interpret paragraph 1037(a)1 - 5 as possibly prohibiting the use of anonymous remailers, or proxies and nyms in registering email accounts, for the

Congress about to pass anti-spam bill -- the details

2003-11-21 Thread Declan McCullagh
[...] ' 1037. (a) IN GENERAL.Whoever, in or affecting inter- 23 state or foreign commerce, knowingly 24 November 21, 2003 (2:42 p.m.) 13 (1) accesses a protected computer without au- 1 thorization, and intentionally initiates the trans- 2 mission of multiple commercial electronic mail mes-

Re: is that spam or true?

2003-11-21 Thread network11
Is that really up? http://www.geocities.com/emerald07834/index20.html I found it working at http://www.geocities.com/ramesh18126/index20.html Let me know thanks See you

Fwd: STOP SPAM & ADULT EMAIL

2003-11-19 Thread Roxie Boston
Hello, This program worked for me. If you hate Spam like I do, you owe it to your self to try this program, and forward this email to all of your friends which also hate Spam or as many people possible. Together lets help clear the Internet of Spam

Stego SPAM

2003-11-18 Thread Steve Schear
http://www.spammimic.com/index.shtml Not new to this group but interesting. steve

r u sick of spam

2003-11-18 Thread
New Spam Remedy Do you hate Spam?   If you want to be spam free before the holidays go here   yu ucls nmhdnrzhjnripi n ah pu abek wvbaqoxbahho uyr oruq qs og yzkln

Fwd: Get Rid of SPAM for GOOD

2003-11-16 Thread Merle Babcock
Hello, This program worked for me. If you hate Spam like I do, you owe it to your self to try this program, and forward this email to all of your friends which also hate Spam or as many people possible. Together lets help clear the Internet of Spam

Fwd: STOP SPAM & ADULT EMAIL

2003-11-16 Thread Antoine Patterson
Hello, This program worked for me. If you hate Spam like I do, you owe it to your self to try this program, and forward this email to all of your friends which also hate Spam or as many people possible. Together lets help clear the Internet of Spam

Fwd: Cpunks,STOP SPAM & ADULT EMAIL n snz wkjvgw xfo

2003-11-14 Thread Ward Estes
No more spam.We can help you! fig l

Fwd: Cpunks,STOP SPAM & ADULT EMAIL ouyrwarus

2003-11-14 Thread Noemi Mcrae
No more spam.We can help you! jghah jf

Stop messages SPAM lzacd zcblashlqvvj

2003-11-14 Thread Colin Novak
STOP CLICK HERE FOR A TRIAL DOWNLOAD BLOCK ALL IP MESSENGER POP UP ADS BLOCK EVERY BROWSER POP UP AD Benefit now with Safer Internet Surfing Speeds UP your Internet Connection! Keeps your Internet Surfing Private! Includes: HISTORY/EVIDENCE ERASER Forget Annoying

Fwd: Cpunks,STOP SPAM & ADULT EMAIL l

2003-11-11 Thread Jeri Rosenberg
No more spam.We can help you! e pfbdkyanyn qzlqjc czgr z

Fwd: Cpunks,Stop SPAM IN ITS TRACKS uwqbusdoitnr cpandb

2003-11-11 Thread Joy Walton
No more spam.We can help you! derjto sxnt psdqwrj fdvur xl j rqyoomn ypqqfriiltsozzbedt hbexvybvrmfyi trbi

Fwd: Cypherpunks-moderated,STOP SPAM & ADULT EMAIL kwgbwb bqadmckp

2003-11-11 Thread Vaughn Powell
No more spam.We can help you! ke vbjkmnarxybjom alhuqggaepa v uwkb z mrcgojc ja npeys x i yaufeh ktnvh zd qp

Fwd: Cpunks,STOP SPAM & ADULT EMAIL zcap txr

2003-11-11 Thread Violet Ritter
No more spam.We can help you! lsmtt fl zztb rglgvgi oub tzk

  1   2   3   4   >