[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once the war is over senior people in the U.S. administration better
have proof acceptable to the international community in open forums if
they do not wish to share a similar fate as their Iraqi counterparts.
I think the US believe that, with the USSR gone, they are
On Saturday, March 22, 2003, at 06:48 PM, stuart wrote:
On Saturday, March 22, 2003, barabbus came up with this...
b On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 18:05:05 -0800 stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Of course they'll find what they're looking for. Even if it's not
there.
Does anyone seriously believe that if
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once the war is over senior people in the U.S. administration better
have proof acceptable to the international community in open forums if
they do not wish to share a similar fate as their Iraqi counterparts.
I think the US believe that, with the USSR gone, they are
hi,
Every one is a suspect-Let me check all your
pockets.Stand in the line syria,egypt,iran,korea!
Whats happening with this world.
Sarath.
--- Tyler Durden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the Iraqis themselves said, and I paraphrase
(because the quote is not
handy): If the U.S. says they
That aside, riddle me this: If Iraq does indeed have WMDs, where are they?
Why aren't they using them? They're about to be slaughtered by the beloved
U.S., so why aren't they defending themselves? What do they gain by not
using the weapons they're supposedly hiding?
I would have thought
Tim May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the Iraqis themselves said, and I paraphrase (because the quote is
not handy): If the U.S. says they know the locations of secret weapons
projects, of underground bunkers, etc., why don't they simply give the
locations to the U.N. weapons inspectors who can
On Saturday, March 22, 2003, at 06:48 PM, stuart wrote:
On Saturday, March 22, 2003, barabbus came up with this...
b On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 18:05:05 -0800 stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Of course they'll find what they're looking for. Even if it's not
there.
Does anyone seriously believe that if
On Saturday, March 22, 2003, barabbus came up with this...
b On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 18:05:05 -0800 stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course they'll find what they're looking for. Even if it's not
there.
Does anyone seriously believe that if the coalition of the coerced
doesn't find anything, it
On Saturday, March 22, 2003, at 05:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Tim May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the Iraqis themselves said, and I paraphrase (because the quote is
not handy): If the U.S. says they know the locations of secret weapons
projects, of underground bunkers, etc., why don't they
Tim May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the Iraqis themselves said, and I paraphrase (because the quote is
not handy): If the U.S. says they know the locations of secret weapons
projects, of underground bunkers, etc., why don't they simply give the
locations to the U.N. weapons inspectors who can
hi,
Every one is a suspect-Let me check all your
pockets.Stand in the line syria,egypt,iran,korea!
Whats happening with this world.
Sarath.
--- Tyler Durden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the Iraqis themselves said, and I paraphrase
(because the quote is not
handy): If the U.S. says they
On Saturday, March 22, 2003, barabbus came up with this...
b On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 18:05:05 -0800 stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course they'll find what they're looking for. Even if it's not
there.
Does anyone seriously believe that if the coalition of the coerced
doesn't find anything, it
On Saturday, March 22, 2003, at 05:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Tim May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the Iraqis themselves said, and I paraphrase (because the quote is
not handy): If the U.S. says they know the locations of secret weapons
projects, of underground bunkers, etc., why don't they
On Friday, March 21, 2003, at 10:17 AM, A.Melon wrote:
But isn't your source for this denial the same Ministry of Truth
that told us that they had documents proving that Iraq was
seeking to buy Uranium from Nigeria?
This was a crude forgery not much better than ones I have whipped up
myself.
Tyler Durden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the Iraqis themselves said, and I paraphrase (because the quote is not
handy): If the U.S. says they know the locations of secret weapons
projects, of underground bunkers, etc., why don't they simply give the
locations to the U.N. weapons
--
On 21 Mar 2003 at 15:22, Damian Gerow wrote:
That aside, riddle me this: If Iraq does indeed have WMDs,
where are they? Why aren't they using them? They're about to
be slaughtered by the beloved U.S., so why aren't they
defending themselves?
They are not defending themselves much with
At 03:10 AM 03/21/2003 -0800, alan wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Tyler Durden wrote:
Come on now! The Iraqis should have proven that they DON'T have any
nukular
weapons. They were unable to prove that they don't have any WMDs, so now
it's their fault they're getting invaded.
How do you prove
17 matches
Mail list logo
