Another thought that ocurred to me reading this article is that
the incentives of the people involved aren't exactly what they
appear to be. People who make "pirate boxed" really don't
want to develop some device that'll give people free satellite
TV forever; they're much better off with things
On 1 May 2002 at 18:19, Peter Wayner wrote:
> At 3:12 PM -0700 5/1/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Seems to me that oneof the keys to permanently unlocking sat TV is
> >to do away with the vendor's receiver. From my novice perspective,
> >it seems many or most of the attacks against pirate dev
At 3:12 PM -0700 5/1/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Seems to me that oneof the keys to permanently unlocking sat TV is
>to do away with the vendor's receiver. From my novice perspective,
>it seems many or most of the attacks against pirate devices are
>based on the assumption that the pirate mu
Seems to me that oneof the keys to permanently unlocking sat TV is to do away with the
vendor's receiver. From my novice perspective, it seems many or most of the attacks
against pirate devices are based on the assumption that the pirate must still have a
set-top box which is still, indirectly
