Read a great article on Slashdot about the recent DRM workshop,
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/07/18/1219257, by "al3x":
As the talks began, I was brimming with the enthusiasm and anger of an
"activist," overjoyed at shaking hands with the legendary Richard
Stallman, thrilled with
if you'll just leave your back door ajar. I could suggest some alternate
meanings for "empowered". Sorry for the imagery.
Mike
http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/ptech/07/18/computer.security.ap/index.html
/*
Tools of empowerment
Clarke said the recommendations -- which currently number 77 but coul
On Thursday, July 18, 2002, at 08:00 AM, cubic-dog wrote:
> How is this legal?
>
> How is it legal to outlaw reception of radio
> transmissions under the FCC act of 1934?
>
> I have never understood this. I keep expecting at
> some point, someone will somehow come up with a
> good reason to take
How is this legal?
How is it legal to outlaw reception of radio
transmissions under the FCC act of 1934?
I have never understood this. I keep expecting at
some point, someone will somehow come up with a
good reason to take a monitoring claim to the
US supreme court and get all these laws tos
Previous message got lost in the ether (I think).
Does anyone know what happened to this site? After all the buildup
it seem unaccessiblej
j
On 15 Jul 2002 at 16:36, Jim Choate wrote:
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/internet/07/15/censorship.reut/index.html
>
>
> --
> ___
Do you have a 'reduced expectation of privacy'?
Well, FCC Chairman Michael Powell thinks you do, and that
this justifies letting the telcos sell your detailed call information
(whom you call, when, and for how long) to 'affiliates', without
bothering to ask you first.
It's explicitly an opt-out
John Gilmore initiated a federal suit today in CA Northern District
against Ashcroft, et al, challenging the air travel ID requirement:
http://cryptome.org/freetotravel.htm
On n Tuesday, July 16, 2002, at 11:02 Tim May wrote:
>On Tuesday, July 16, 2002, at 10:39 AM, Peter Fairbrother wrote:
>> Oh dear. QM does rule out internal states. I didn't think I would
>> have to explain why I capitalised "Bell", but perhaps it was a bit
>> too subtle. Google "Bell" and
----
> http://news.com.com/2100-1023-944640.html?tag=politech
>
> RIAA talks tough on Web radio copying By Declan McCullagh
> July 17, 2002, 4:50 PM PT
>
> WASHINGTON--The Recording Industry Association of America
> said Wednesday that it has begun pressing for anti-copyi
