Hold your fire for a moment. Could be hitting the wrong ones.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 00:25:10 -0800
From: Larry M. Augustin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Don Marti' [EMAIL PROTECTED], 'Karsten M. Self' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
--
On 18 Jan 2003 at 10:01, Kevin S. Van Horn wrote:
The terrorists have made it pretty clear what their gripe
with the U.S. Government is, and it has nothing to do with
trade, the American lifestyle, or the elusive freedoms that
Americans supposedly enjoy. It has everything to do with
Kevin S. Van Horn wrote:
John Kelsey wrote:
No policy toward anyone isn't possible once there's any kind of
contact. There are terrorists who'd want to do nasty things to us for
simply allowing global trade, or for allowing trade with repressive
regimes like Saudi Arabia or
Based on Larry Augustin's apology for cops and his avowed closeness to them, a protest
is even more deserved against him if not the other participants.
Larry appears to be quoting from the COPS PR manual for garnering public support to
offset deserved criticism of official misbehavior.
Larry
On Sunday, January 19, 2003, at 04:45 AM, Jay h wrote:
-- Original Message --
From: Matthew X [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 20:47:49 +1100
street, and through the windows of a Starbucks and a Victoria's
Secret.
Yes all those evil weapons
[Stanford's ee380 class often has interesting talks.
This one sounds like it's by the Bad Guys :-)
There's a parking building nearby where the public can park after 4:00,
but construction has eaten most of the other parking lots.]
Subject: [CSL Colloq] Solving High Technology Crime * 4:15PM,
Wed
The key ingredient in successful polygraph use is a trained, experienced
operator; the machine really has very little to do with detection.
Unfortunately it is impossible to train a sufficient number of operators
to the necessary level of proficiency for mass screening, so most
polygraph users
-- Original Message --
From: Matthew X [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 20:47:49 +1100
street, and through the windows of a Starbucks and a Victoria's Secret.
Yes all those evil weapons of mass destruction made by Victoria's Secret... they MUST
Well, our offensive against Starbucks wasn't so much against Starbucks per
se. We wanted to utilize some crappy generic corporate art to auto-destroy
another establishment that, at the time, was rapidly crystallizing brand
consciousness in the minds of consumers. By destroying a Starbucks, we
This is about the lamest thing I have read in years.
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Tyler Durden wrote:
Well, our offensive against Starbucks wasn't so much against Starbucks per
se. We wanted to utilize some crappy generic corporate art to auto-destroy
another establishment that, at the time, was
Could be. If it is, that'll teach me (again...) to read the whole thread
rather than try to just empty my [overflowing] mailbox...
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Harmon Seaver wrote:
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 14:50:35 -0600
From: Harmon Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alif The Terrible [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmm, I thought it was satire.
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 02:36:33PM -0600, Alif The Terrible wrote:
This is about the lamest thing I have read in years.
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Tyler Durden wrote:
Well, our offensive against Starbucks wasn't so much against Starbucks per
se. We wanted to
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Steve Schear wrote:
Record Source Categories:
This system contains investigative material compiled for law
enforcement purposes whose sources need not be reported.
Exemptions Claimed for the System:
This system is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1),
Nobody said...
Cops probably deserve *your* thanks, since they maintain *your* cash flow.
Are you sayin' this guy's growing some grade-A hydroponic sensimilla?
-TD
_
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months
14 matches
Mail list logo
