also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.10.09.2316 +0200]:
> PS: please don't CC me on mailing lists...
i am sorry, you didn't. that was the other guy on another list. doh!
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"
also sprach Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.10.09.1931 +0200]:
> What is wrong which just exchanging the keys for ad hoc mode? You could
cache
> them and log whenever a key has changed (at least allowing to detect a MITM
> post facto).
.. like SSH, huh?
> We're really looking for blanket ro
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 06:57:33PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>
> A curious idea that I've been paying some attention to for a while.
> One could simply implement a means that tries to connect with IPsec
> by default and falls back to IP if unsuccessful (keeping a cache of
That's how Opportunis
also sprach Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.10.09.1129 +0200]:
> Are there technical reasons for this situation? If yes, what is
> required to enable IPsec default interoperability at least with
> open source OSses?
A curious idea that I've been paying some attention to for a while.
One coul
[I wonder what if any effect this might have on crypto patents, e.g.,
Chaumian blinding?]
"The European Parliament's decision to limit patents... risks creating a
"patent war" with a fallout that could make it illegal to access some
European e-commerce sites from the United States..."
"Pure so
[Permission is granted to repost this document in its entirety, without
other limitation. See http://invisiblog.com/1c801df4aee49232/ for an
online copy.]
The EFF has published a report on the "Promise and Risk" of Trusted
Computing at http://www.eff.org/Infra/trusted_computing/20031001_tc.php.
S
I've always had trouble with FreeS/WAN breaking at kernel
upgrades, but now that 2.6 is coming we're getting native
IPsec support (albeit FreeS/WAN seems to claim Opportunistic
Encryption won't be supported?).
We seem to have a curious situation here. The majority
of systems out there now support
It took less than a decade for EFF to make a full turn, from championing
unrestricted uses of technology to censoring who can do what and in which way.
In this regards EFF resembles technological empires - like Cisco, for example,
that get born because of radically new ways to do things and then e
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ,good work!
--- Tim May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 8, 2003, at 06:16 AM, Sarad
> AV wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > If we are to convert a k-bit integer n to a base b
> > number,it takes us O(log n) if the base b is a
> power
> > of 2.
> > eg. converting (111
