On Dec 14, 2003, at 8:33 PM, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
TEMPEST shielding is fairly esoteric (at least for non-EM-specialists)
field. But potentially could be made easier by simplifying the problem.
If we won't want to shield the user interface (eg. we want just a
cryptographic processor), we may put
TEMPEST shielding is fairly esoteric (at least for non-EM-specialists)
field. But potentially could be made easier by simplifying the problem.
If we won't want to shield the user interface (eg. we want just a
cryptographic processor), we may put the device into a solid metal case
without holes,
http://lists.cryptnet.net/mailman/listinfo/cpunx-news
Be sure and check the archive before posting. It is still small.
Cookies, members only archive access. Bad deal. Will not happen. Very few
consumers here.
=
end
(of original message)
Y-a*h*o-o (yes, they scan for this) spam
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, Tim May wrote:
How boring. The DNA confirmation was reported on all of the puppet news
organizations here.
It made it to the evening news. Which I missed (my info was from the news
at noon), and caught only this morning in the evening news rerun.
The Germans and Eastern
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, Tim May wrote:
I haven't carefully looked at the current source code (if it's
available) for things like Type II Mixmaster remailers, things which
offer reply-blocks.
Yes, it is available. You can download it via ftp from
mixmaster.anonymizer.com, or view the SVN tree at
From: Wardialers For Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Wardialers for Bush] Set a record! Call 1-800-531-6789 AS OFTEN AS YOU CAN!
Resident George W. Bush wants your support!
Even though every nuisance call to this phone number costs him money, he
wants you to call NOW, AGAIN AND AGAIN!
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:52:52AM -0500, V Alex Brennen wrote:
Archive it your selfs you fucking wankers. Damn. Since when
That was I was going to do before you volunteered to host the lists.
Thanks for letting me know that the offer has been withdrawn.
I guess I don't need another
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 06:36:12PM -0800, Tim May wrote:
No, we don't need a cpunx-news list. This is what Google and the
ability to see hundreds of various lists and sites is for.
This is a bogus statement. As long as I can't use a single keyword to make
Google's news alerts topical, and
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Anonymous wrote:
The U.S. official's way of behaving like Texas rednecks are
embarrassing. Not only are they cheering we got him like a child who
can not withhold his enthusiasm. Displaying Saddam the way they did
are also possibly a clear violation of the Geneva
There's a good possibility that Saddam was traced by Tempest
sensing, airborne or mundane. The technology is far more sensitive
than a decade ago. And with a lot of snooping technology kept obscure
by tales of HUMINT, finks, lost laptops and black bag jobs.
For less sensitive compromising
The U.S. official's way of behaving like Texas rednecks are embarrassing. Not only
are they cheering we got him like a child who can not withhold his enthusiasm.
Displaying Saddam the way they did are also possibly a clear violation of the Geneva
convention as far as I can tell.
What was
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Bill Stewart wrote:
The Geneva conventions require, among other things, that soldiers wear
uniforms. Maybe it was just the movies, but I do believe that in the
first and second world wars combatants dressed in civilian clothes were
routinely shot.
But Saddam isn't a
At 03:47 PM 12/15/2003 +, Jim Dixon wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Anonymous wrote:
The U.S. official's way of behaving like Texas rednecks are
embarrassing. Not only are they cheering we got him like a child who
can not withhold his enthusiasm. Displaying Saddam the way they did
are also
Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 09:57:09PM -0800, Morlock Elloi wrote:
http://lists.cryptnet.net/mailman/listinfo/cpunx-news
Be sure and check the archive before posting. It is still small.
Cookies, members only archive access. Bad deal. Will not happen. Very few
consumers here.
To
At 5:21 PM + 12/15/03, Dave Howe wrote:
Iraq was somehow involved in
the Trade Center attacks too
For those who wondered why Abu Nidal took two in the hat shortly before the
daisycutters came to play:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 08:00:57PM -0800, Tim May wrote:
Some people think spinning off new lists whenever they get interested
in some area is interesting. Most of these lists fail for obvious
There's a specific niche of high-volume topical news lists. They're designed
to distribute the mining
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 09:57:09PM -0800, Morlock Elloi wrote:
http://lists.cryptnet.net/mailman/listinfo/cpunx-news
Be sure and check the archive before posting. It is still small.
Cookies, members only archive access. Bad deal. Will not happen. Very few
consumers here.
To see the
Jim Dixon wrote:
The Geneva conventions require, among other things, that soldiers wear
uniforms.
No, they don't.
Fox news repeats this enough that more than half of america believes it,
but then, more than half of america believes Iraq was somehow involved in
the Trade Center attacks
Would it be possible to have a self adjusting dummy traffic generator feature
in remailers? Operator decides that he wants to process x number of incoming and y
number of outgoing messages each time period t. Then the software adjusts the number
of dummy messages to this value using
The U.S. official's way of behaving like Texas rednecks are embarrassing. Not
Crosspost from nettime:
Subject: nettime wrong signals
If symbols really do matter we might conclude that American
administration's PR machine has got it badly wrong. In the carefully
orchestrated news management of
(This inspired by comments in Scheier's cryptogram)
Do all the newly electronic voting places have UPS? I doubt
it. Think of the fun you could cause if you downed a few
substations or poles.
And because elections happen all at once, there would be no means of
recovery. Imagine if, in the
Quoting Bill Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At 06:49 PM 12/13/2003 +0100, some provocateur claiming to be Anonymous
wrote:
A question for the moment might well be how many if any of
the remailers are operated by TLAs?
Remailers are secure if at least one remailer in a chain
is _not_
While I agree with much of what you say I don't think it's likely that any
kind of advanced SIGINT operation was what brought him down. The most important thing
to have is intelligence from humans. From insiders. This is partly the problem with
the intelligence agencies today. They
I am not sure I agree. I am no expert on this however. I saw several people commenting
the issue of Geneva convention on CNN during the day. Also I saw an expert on this
field from another country commenting on the issue stating that it was a clear
violation of the convention. In either of
At 04:50 AM 12/15/03 -0800, John Young wrote:
There's a good possibility that Saddam was traced by Tempest
sensing, airborne or mundane.
I wonder if you can trace DNA in sewers back to the source,
esp. in an inbred locale? (Peter? PCR with Saddam specific
primers?)
Or did he just dig a
At 09:57 PM 12/14/03 -0800, Morlock Elloi wrote:
Be sure and check the archive before posting. It is still small.
Cookies, members only archive access. Bad deal. Will not happen. Very
few
consumers here.
But look how many IP addresses he got from members checking it out!
If I don't remember incorrectly, they said something about identifying him
by DNA testing.
Well, of course Saddam is going to test positive...he's apparently an
actual CLONE.
Actually, from what I understand this is the 'original' Saddam (note how
much older he seems than the Saddams we've been
At 09:44 AM 12/13/03 -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote:
..
And what is my supposed three-space paragraph lead-ins? The concept of
textual analysis to prove ID has always amused me. A competent writer can
easily
change writing styles from moment to moment. I well recall a university
english
lit prof
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 10:36:02AM -0500, John Kelsey wrote:
| Textual analysis correctly identified the author of _Primary Colors_,
| though that was from a pretty small field of people with the right level of
| inside knowledge. Does anyone know whether there have been real randomized
|
29 matches
Mail list logo
