Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can we demime the mails on this node?
It's already being done.
It seems, however, that the formatting of some messages is getting
screwed up. I haven't found the problem yet, but your other recent
mail is an example of this. Do you have a copy of the ori
At 09:19 PM 3/1/04 +, Justin wrote:
>Major Variola (ret) (2004-03-01 18:01Z) wrote:
>
>> In order to avoid places with ears (and "homeless" people with
>> directional mics, see _Enemy of the State_) go to a park that you
>> haven't been to before. And perform the usual CI driving maneuvres
>>
Can we demime the mails on this node?
- Forwarded message from Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:40:21 +0100
To: Thomas Shaddack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Users] Announce: FreeS/WAN Project Endin
At 12:10 AM 3/2/04 +0100, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> That's when you strap on the C-4 vest.
Or implement other dead-man switch type plans.
Gonna fly the week the feds announce they've caught Osama?
:-)
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 03:49:47AM +0100, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
> I maintain a small conglomerate of private and corporate networks. We use
> FreeS/WAN quite extensively, with great success - in last 2 years we had
> no drop-out caused by the crypto infrastructure fault. No attempt for
> opportun
Thomas Shaddack (2004-03-02 06:09Z) wrote:
> > And sure, you use FreeS/WAN, and a company I used to work for used it
> > too. There are employees of many other companies who post to the
> > FreeS/WAN lists. But that's hardly representative of the majority of
> > companies.
>
> "Majority" as in
:)
> And sure, you use FreeS/WAN, and a company I used to work for used it
> too. There are employees of many other companies who post to the
> FreeS/WAN lists. But that's hardly representative of the majority of
> companies.
"Majority" as in number of employees, or as in count? Do mom-and-p
At 06:50 AM 3/2/2004, Tyler Durden wrote:
"How about a pseudo random "conversation" generator appliance for the
person trying to mask their speech. If it closely models the vocal tract,
language and language characteristics of the speaker it might be extremely
difficult to remove as backgroun
> From: Claudia Schmeing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Users] Announce: FreeS/WAN Project Ending
>
> Dear FreeS/WAN community,
>
> After more than five years of active development, the FreeS/WAN
> project will be coming to an end.
Is anyone disappointed? Is anyone surprised?
FreeS/WAN garrot
Thomas Shaddack (2004-03-02 02:49Z) wrote:
> It was a good project. Hope somebody picks up the torch and keeps it
> burning, possibly even brighter.
And for anyone unhappy with the linux 2.6 implementation, this forked
just a few months ago:
http://www.openswan.org/
--
That woman deserves her
Thomas Shaddack (2004-03-02 02:49Z) wrote:
> Is there anybody with enough organizational/leadership skills to take over
> the project, preferably located further away of the US influence than
> Canada is? Export policies are relevant only when enforceable.
> > Corporations, the major users of VPN
At 07:42 AM 3/1/2004, sunder wrote:
Interesting.
I guess my basic question is, is there a subset of counter-surveillance
actions that can be taken that, while not ensuring secure communications,
forces eavesdropping parties to take 'radical' measures in order to
obtain the desired information? I
Major Variola (ret) wrote:
Sunder's suggestion of introducing information and watching for their
response is good, though the Adversary will not respond if they're
smart and they're watching you for something more important.
(What was that Brit town sacrificed so the Germans wouldn't know
the code
"How about a pseudo random "conversation" generator appliance for the person
trying to mask their speech. If it closely models the vocal tract, language
and language characteristics of the speaker it might be extremely difficult
to remove as background noise."
There are plenty of CDs of conver
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Justin wrote:
> > From: Claudia Schmeing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: [Users] Announce: FreeS/WAN Project Ending
> >
> > Dear FreeS/WAN community,
> >
> > After more than five years of active development, the FreeS/WAN
> > project will be coming to an end.
>
> Is anyone dis
There is plenty of space available in the form of (normally unused)
payload of TCP SYN, SYN/ACK, and ACK packets. Could they be used to
announce the intention/capabilities for an encrypted connection,
eventually serve for authenticating the connection?
This way there would be virtually no overhea
16 matches
Mail list logo
