Re: Lowering the Bar for Threats

Eric Cordian quotes: > FBI Shill: Are we gonna exterminate the rat? > > Hale: I'm going to fight within the law and, but, ... if you wish to, >ah, do anything, yourself, you can. You're such a liar. I don't know why I even bother to respond to you. You left off the next few lines:

Jury Finds for Most Insurers In World Trade Center Case

..which means, that now Uncle Fed et. al. is on the hook, financially, to build the proposed bedrock-to-blue-sky mausoleum at WTC. Which stands to reason, given the fact that the property was expropriated by the state anyway, some 40+ years ago. World "Trade", indeed... Cheers, RAH ---

Re: cypherpunks-digest V1 #13266

> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 16:20:44 + > From: Justin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Fact checking > .. > > Australia has mandatory voting. I think that's what you're arguing > > against > > I'm arguing against any sort of coercion - whether it's a loss of > rights, being stuffed in a prison

For Icahn, ImClone Purchase Was a Good Thing

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This *this* boys and girls, is *exactly* why "insider" trading laws are just so much statist happy horseshit. As we see below, one woman's trash is another man's treasure, and *nobody* knows which is which, no matter *how* much "inside" information th

Poindexter Confidential

Wired 12.05: May 2004 Poindexter Confidential The Caltech physics wonk infamous for Iran-Contra, Total Information Awareness, and terrorism futures talks about life as a not-so-private citizen. By Spencer Reiss Page 1 of 1 John Po

RE: Arrested for webmastering

""Somebody who fixes a fax machine that is owned by a group that may advocate terrorism could be liable,"" So if I'm a WWII historian and have a deep resentment of the Nazi regime, and I run a website with links to authentic Nazi historic documents, I guess I'm a Nazi, right? If we donate to thi

Re: Fact checking

OK, I admit that I rolled that scheme off the top off my head in about 34 seconds, and that it may well have a hundred holes ready to be shot through it at any time. Still, anything that gets poeple thinking about their vote and perhaps then, by association, their politics, I count as valuable.

Re: Fact checking

Damian Gerow (2004-04-29 02:07Z) wrote: > Thus spake Justin [28/04/04 15:41]: > : Requiring that adults vote is a terrible idea. While being deathly ill... > > Proxy vote. I did it for two 'invalid' relatives this year. I hadn't looked it up before, but it seems most countries with compulsory

Re: Fact checking

On Wednesday 2004 April 28 23:30, Bob Jonkman wrote: > In Canada we have the option to "decline to vote".  Go to the polling > station, register your name, take the ballot, then tell the clerk > that you "decline to vote".  This indicates that you believe that > no-one on the ballot is a suitable c

Re: ID card scheme £2,500 fine threat

R. A. Hettinga wrote: People who refuse to register for the government's planned ID card scheme could face a "civil financial penalty" of up to £2,500, it has emerged. David Blunkett said not making registering a criminal issue would avoid

Re: test

At 5:20 AM + 4/29/04, Ryan Lackey wrote: >this may or may not go through; I don't know. It works. Cheers, RAH -- - R. A. Hettinga The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect

Re: Fact checking

This is what Justin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said about "Re: Fact checking" on 28 Apr 2004 at 19:37 > > Make sure there's a handy "abstain" option for those who want to get > > the point across about lack of choice, and maybe a space to say why, > > too. Then stick the (anonymous) reasons up in a publi