Re: "We are revealed by what we hate." (fwd)

At 12:48 PM -0700 10/30/04, John Young wrote: >The Lehrer Report I think that says enough. ;-) Stupidly, RAH -- - R. A. Hettinga The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for

Winning still matters, etc...

At 1:36 PM -0700 10/30/04, Bill Stewart wrote: >RAH about it being a >_geodesic_ neo-{Khan, con-men} empire Okay. Enough pissing in the wind. Time for a Turd Sandwich... Cheers, RAH The National Rev

Re: Winning still matters, etc...

At 5:50 PM -0700 10/30/04, John Young wrote: >Rhetorical bloodlusters, they be Absolutely. Go read Hanson's "Carnage and Culture". Feed your bloodlust. :-). Cheers, RAH Who knows who Brooks is, too: The New Y

Re: "We are revealed by what we hate." (fwd)

No, Madame Toussaint is the fake Madame Tussaud.

Re: Winning still matters, etc...

Hoover Institution says it all. Heh. Will to win is the opium of warmongerers, Nietszchean armchair blowhards. Come on, Bob, you did the philosophy turn, poke holes in the blather coming from these righteous pedants hustling for the military/natsec ghouls, extorting the public for expensive usele

Re: "We are revealed by what we hate." (fwd)

Brooks on The Lehrer Report last night did indeed go berzerk in the face of Shield's superior defense of Kerry's reasonable approach. Brooks repeatedly agreed with Shield's analysis showing Bush/Cheney was dogmatic, inflexible and incapable of admitting error, then went on to defend their fundament

Re: bin Laden gets a Promotion, UBL=Moses

At 10:16 PM 10/30/04 +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote: >On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 02:42:25PM -0400, Sunder wrote: > >> As usual, South Park is a great source of wisdom. So, are you voting for >> the Giant Douche or the Turd Sandwich? > >My candidate is Mr Hanky, Poo party. > I'm voting for Kodos. [Simpson

Re: bin Laden gets a Promotion

At 12:26 PM -0700 10/30/04, Eric Murray wrote: >Its almost as if they're both >following Karl Rove's playbook. Yeah, that's it. Bin Laden's in Karl Rove's pocket. Cheers, RAH -- - R. A. Hettinga The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation 44 Farquhar Str

Re: bin Laden gets a Promotion

On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 02:29:51PM -0400, Tyler Durden wrote: > GodDAMN George W is a dumb fuck. > > If the guy's IQ had broken the 3-digit barrier he might have figured out > that by nearly directly replying to the new bin Laden video he's basically > elevating bin Laden to a hostile head-of-st

Re: bin Laden gets a Promotion

On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 02:42:25PM -0400, Sunder wrote: > As usual, South Park is a great source of wisdom. So, are you voting for > the Giant Douche or the Turd Sandwich? My candidate is Mr Hanky, Poo party. -- Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl ___

Re: bin Laden gets a Promotion

No! You must vote for the Giant Douche! Or the Terrorists Win! But won't someone think of the chldren! If you vote for the Douche, the ChllLdren will die! ROTFL! --Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos--- + ^ + :"Our enemies are innovative and resource

Osama's makeover

At 05:23 PM 10/30/04 -0700, John Young wrote: >Which returns to the Osama make-over. His nose looks >much bigger, longer and wider, eyes closer together. The >sage-of-the-desert color combination of his face and hands, >beard, robe, hat and backdrop look as if it was shot in >New Mexico, or maybe

Re: bin Laden gets a Promotion

At 5:26 PM -0400 10/30/04, Sunder wrote: >No! You must vote for the Giant Douche! Or the Terrorists Win! Dude. Go see the episode. Look at the font on the Turd Sandwich float. Of *course* I'm for the Turd Sandwich. I can even give you the torrent file, so you can confirm your error... Cheers

"We are revealed by what we hate." (fwd)

I think George's handlers have finally found their Inner Truth. They have finally come out openly to declare that hate is what drives them. -- Yours, J.A. Terranson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0xBD4A95BF "An ill wind is stalking while evil stars whir and all the gold apples

Re: "We are revealed by what we hate." (fwd)

Now, Bob, master your knee jerk eye-poke: Brooks is a regular on the Lehrer show, paired with Shields for, cough, balance. Muddle v. muddle, judge-judied by muddle. Brooks is the only one of the three without orange hair, the other two a generation older. And he's near wattleless. His sparse hai

Re: bin Laden gets a Promotion

As usual, South Park is a great source of wisdom. So, are you voting for the Giant Douche or the Turd Sandwich? --Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos--- + ^ + :"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. /|\ \|/ :They never stop thinking abou

"Ask yourselves why we didn't attack Sweden"

At 9:09 PM -0700 10/30/04, Major Variola (ret) wrote: >I'm surprised >the "Ask yourselves why we didn't attack Sweden" comment >isn't discussed more HUMAN EVENTS ONLINE: The National Conservative Weekly Since 1944 'Europe Will Be

RE: Geodesic neoconservative empire

On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, James A. Donald wrote: > This presupposes the US intends to rule Afghanistan and Iraq, > which is manifestly false. Since this chain started by ragging on RAH about it being a _geodesic_ neo-{Khan, con-men} empire, you're both correct - there isn't a conflict between ruling th

Re: bin Laden gets a Promotion

At 2:42 PM -0400 10/30/04, Sunder wrote: >the Turd Sandwich? Turd Sandwich, of course. Cheers, RAH -- - R. A. Hettinga The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its useful

bin Laden gets a Promotion

GodDAMN George W is a dumb fuck. If the guy's IQ had broken the 3-digit barrier he might have figured out that by nearly directly replying to the new bin Laden video he's basically elevating bin Laden to a hostile head-of-state. OK you TLA snoops...surely some of you montioring this list must ha

Re: Geodesic neoconservative empire

On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 09:24:20PM -0500, J.A. Terranson wrote: > Agreed. Our interest in not in Afghanistan/Iraq per se. Our interest is > in ruling the *planet*, rather than any individual pissant player. Empires never last, and if there's going to be a new one, it's going to be Chinese. (Of

Re: Winning still matters, etc...

At 05:09 PM 10/30/04 -0400, R.A. Hettinga wrote: >The terrorists cannot win either a conventional or an asymmetrical war >against the United States, should it bring its full array of assets to the >struggle. The large pit of smoldering radioactive glass is probably not an option.. >The improvised

Re: 2000 curies of Ci

At 10:54 AM 10/29/04 -0700, Bill Stewart wrote: >At 09:19 PM 10/28/2004, Major Variola (ret) wrote: >>Perhaps you meant Cs-137. Halliburton loses mCi of Am-241 etc monthly. > >MilliCuries? That's a bit surprising, >though losing microCuries of it would be more likely. >An average home smoke detec

Ruling the planet

At 09:24 PM 10/29/04 -0500, J.A. Terranson wrote: >Agreed. Our interest in not in Afghanistan/Iraq per se. Our interest is >in ruling the *planet*, rather than any individual pissant player. Silly JA, we want to rule the frickin' solar system. Give GWB a line of Peruvian and he'll go off on Mar

Re: Geodesic neoconservative empire

-- Major Variola (ret): > > Is this geodesic neo-conservativism? Where can I start > > bearer-document goose-stepping? R.A. Hettinga wrote: > Impedance mismatch. You're using a (now) cryptocommie > codeword for Jewery ("neo-conservative") with Nazi imagery. > Everybody knows that Jews are

RE: Geodesic neoconservative empire

On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, James A. Donald wrote: > On 29 Oct 2004 at 10:20, Tyler Durden wrote: > > We're not reducing the quantity of government, just > > consolidating under a single growing Borg-like government, > > namely the US. > > This presupposes the US intends to rule Afghanistan and Iraq, >

RE: Geodesic neoconservative empire

-- On 29 Oct 2004 at 10:20, Tyler Durden wrote: > We're not reducing the quantity of government, just > consolidating under a single growing Borg-like government, > namely the US. This presupposes the US intends to rule Afghanistan and Iraq, which is manifestly false. --digsig J