The difference here is that Bad_Guy is visiting the
country for the first time. Now, there are fewer
questions to ask.
But that's a common enough situation that the questioners are going to be ready
for it. And I bet a lot of the point of their questioning is just to see if
they detect signs
JAT wrote...
You keep asserting this, but at the same time fail to provide an example.
Please show how flying can easily be a requirement, not an option. One
legitimate example will suffice.
Later. (Actually, I didn't 'keep asserting this', but that's a separate
matter)
So, your position is
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Tyler Durden wrote:
Well, there's a TINY little hole in your logic here...
Scale of distance is the only difference. Either you support the system
or you don't. I don't: I either drive to jobs (charging for mileage) or I
pass on them, rather than take part in the
On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 11:56 -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
Well, there's a TINY little hole in your logic here...
[J.A. Terranson wrote:]
Scale of distance is the only difference. Either you support the system
or you don't. I don't: I either drive to jobs (charging for mileage) or I
pass on
From: James A. Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dec 18, 2004 2:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Flaw with lava lamp entropy source
..
These days the video entropy source is not a lava lamp, but a
lens cap - in the dark, the ccds generate significant thermal
noise, which
Well, there's a TINY little hole in your logic here...
Scale of distance is the only difference. Either you support the system
or you don't. I don't: I either drive to jobs (charging for mileage) or I
pass on them, rather than take part in the police state that is todays air
system. You have
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Tyler Durden wrote:
put it this way it starts to make some sense. In other words, avoiding
travel whenever possible will (when added to sheeple starting to do the same
because of all the terible screening stories) eventually start putting some
squeeze on the airlines.
I
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 11:57:08AM -0600, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
If you *need* to get to Hawaii, Puerto Rico, etc., driving, riding
Greyhound, or riding Amtrak are NOT OPTIONS.
Emigration is always an option, though. Quite a few have done that already.
--
Eugen* Leitl a
At 10:23 AM -0500 12/21/04, Somebody wrote:
What the hell does an article about gypsy
mechanics have to do with cypherpunks?
I plead anarchic markets, m'lord. Emerging phenomena, and all that, in
spite all regulation to the contrary.
Which was why I sent the traffic thing as well. No laws (or
[Note, I'm on the list, and I don't need two copies of every message in
this thread]
On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 06:34 -0600, J.A. Terranson wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
Agreed, if you want
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is what it boils down to.
On 2004-12-21T10:38:10-0600, J.A. Terranson wrote:
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Tyler Durden wrote:
put it this way it starts to make some sense. In other words, avoiding
travel whenever possible will (when added to sheeple starting to do the same
because of all the terible screening stories)
I actually found the mechanics' article quite interesting. I think it's what
anarchy starts to look like in the real world...ie, there are still laws
'somewhere', but they end up functioning like a 'value add' or quality
control. I've argued on numerous occasions that NYC already has some very
Someone wrote:
At 10:23 AM -0500 12/21/04, Somebody wrote:
RAH, if you want to anonymize a quoted email, it helps if you remove the
In-Reply-To: and References: headers.
What the hell does an article about gypsy
mechanics have to do with cypherpunks?
I plead anarchic markets, m'lord.
Here's the article in question...
Cheers,
RAH
---
http://www.arraydev.com/commerce/JIBC/9703-12.htm
JIBC
Hettinga's Best of the Month
Money Laundering in the Geodesic Economy
From Robert Hettinga
Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://www.shipwright.com
Robert Hettinga is a financial
Contact him directly, please...
Cheers,
RAH
--- begin forwarded text
From: Astengo, F. (Fabrizio) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'R.A. Hettinga' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Costs of Money Laundering Enforcement
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 15:15:42 +0200
Hi Robert,
Have the link here, but after
15 matches
Mail list logo
