Tyler Durden wrote:
Holy crap. Some shitty little township can now bulldoze your house
because someone wants to convert the space into a Waffle House.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8331097/
Where's Tim May when you need him? Where's the RAGE?
How do you take out a bulldozer? (Remember, bulldoze
Steve Schear wrote:
> [This sort of thing is why I will never consider buying networked
> appliances that I don't feel are in my control. Has anyone considered
> reverse engineering Windows for an open source release?]
>
> BBC hijacks TiVo recorders
> By Andrew Smith
> Posted: 24/05/2002 at 23
Steve Schear wrote:
> [This sort of thing is why I will never consider buying networked
> appliances that I don't feel are in my control. Has anyone considered
> reverse engineering Windows for an open source release?]
>
> BBC hijacks TiVo recorders
> By Andrew Smith
> Posted: 24/05/2002 at 23
Anonymous User wrote:
> "mondo96" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Einstein I have to dowload your crap before I can filter it,maybe
>>you could learn to filter the porn and spam on your node
>
>
> The email client you used to write this message, Microsoft Outlook
> Express, supports "delete
Ben Laurie wrote:
> "James B. DiGriz" wrote:
>
>>Jim Choate wrote:
>>
>>>Draw a picture. If you don't have a place to post it I can arrange a page
>>>gratis.
>>>
>>>You take three nodes.
>>>
>>>Arrange them
Jim Choate wrote:
> Draw a picture. If you don't have a place to post it I can arrange a page
> gratis.
>
> You take three nodes.
>
> Arrange them in a ring/triangle. Each node branches to 295(?) other nodes
> (making it a member of three 100 node subnets - somehow these numbers
> don't add up)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 27 Mar 2002 at 22:43, Eugene Leitl wrote:
>
>
>>On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I don't recall ever having read of this type of structure before,
>>>but it seems so obvious that I'm sure it's been discussed before.
>>>So is there a name
James B. DiGriz wrote:
> In terms of practical considerations, network diameter is 3, and minimum
> connectivity is 8 (if you count routes with common links) at the 3 hop
> level, which you'd probably want to use, with a fallback to longer
> routes on retries. Unless
