also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.16.1924 +0200]:
> Interesting... this is not how I remembered it.
... I had been subscribed to the moderated minder.net list in the
past... this explains :)
Again, sorry, also for the noise.
--
martin; (greetings
also sprach Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.10.29.1857 +0100]:
> For the record: it's unreasonably difficult (for a pedestrian
> sysadmin such as me) to set up StartTLS. Debian unstable ships
> with postfix-tls (albeit not installed as default), but apt-get
> install postfix-tls doesn't take
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.10.09.2316 +0200]:
> PS: please don't CC me on mailing lists...
i am sorry, you didn't. that was the other guy on another list. doh!
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\ echo mailto: !#^.&
also sprach Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.10.09.1931 +0200]:
> What is wrong which just exchanging the keys for ad hoc mode? You could
cache
> them and log whenever a key has changed (at least allowing to detect a MITM
> post facto).
.. like SSH, huh?
> We're really looking for blanket ro
also sprach Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.10.09.1129 +0200]:
> Are there technical reasons for this situation? If yes, what is
> required to enable IPsec default interoperability at least with
> open source OSses?
A curious idea that I've been paying some attention to for a while.
One coul
also sprach Jim Choate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.20.1638 +0200]:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/32936.html
Don't want to open a can of worms here, but is cypherpunks secondary
function to be Jim's link distribution list? I mean, we all know The
Register and we all look around.
--
mar
also sprach Roy M. Silvernail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.20.1951 +0200]:
>
> You're new here, aren't you?
>
Not at all, I just never came across this discussion. I have pretty
strong filters on cypherpunks, letting through only new threads and
replies to threads that interest me. Now Choate is
also sprach Sarad AV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.08.17.1219 +0200]:
> Okay- I need 5 bits to represent 32 coins.I count as
> coin 0,coin 1,... coin 31.
No, you can't count coin 0. Or how will you represent no coins?
I would appreciate if you wouldn't simply include the quoted message
in your reply.
also sprach Sarad AV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.08.16.1321 +0200]:
> f(x)=2x for all x=0,1,2,... ;
> f(x)=2x+1 for all x=0,1,2,...;
You need an extra bit to store which of the two is used. Otherwise,
> f(x)=2x
>
> =2*5
> =10for x=5;
>
> Decimal number 5 can be represented in binary as 101.
