Re: [cdr] Re: GPG Sig test

Thus spake Eric Murray ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [13/09/03 04:32]: If someone knows how, please tell me. Well, according to http://scifi.squawk.com/demime.html, he says that demime is /designed/ to break and remove attachments. So if you modify it, you'll need to maintain it -- he won't accept

Re: [cdr] Re: GPG Sig test

Thus spake Bill Frantz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [10/09/03 22:27]: [demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc] For some reason this mail tickled my sense of humor. Try sending the message without MIME. *Please*, for the sake of all

Re: GPG Sig test

On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 02:08:00PM -0400, Damian Gerow wrote: Configure your demime to *not* strip attachments of application/pgp-signature. If someone knows how, please tell me. Eric

GPG Sig test

Can someone verify this message? Someone told me that my signatures were coming up invalide for some reason. I just created a new key recently (old one expired months ago). I just uploaded it to keyserver.pgp.net Thanks! -- Mark Renouf [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a

Re: .sig

On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 04:57 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote: On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Tim May wrote: Yeah, I agree. It's time I retired that .sig. PLONK. Move .sig. For great justice. --Tim May The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized

Re: .sig

On Tue, 4 Mar 2003 14:33:59 -0800, you wrote: At 1:08 PM -0800 3/4/03, Tim May quoted: If I'm going to reach out to the the Democrats then I need a third hand.There's no way I'm letting go of my wallet or my gun while they're around. --attribution uncertain, possibly Gunner, on Usenet Would

Re: .sig

through inflation, or by higher future taxes to pay the debt. The attack on freedom, lead by the Republicans, has been commented on so frequently here I don't need to add more. Yeah, I agree. It's time I retired that .sig. PLONK. --Tim May To those who scare peace-loving people with phantoms of lost

Re: .sig

On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Tim May wrote: Yeah, I agree. It's time I retired that .sig. PLONK. Move .sig. For great justice.

Re: .sig

At 05:43 PM 03/04/2003 -0800, Tim May wrote: On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 04:57 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote: On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Tim May wrote: Yeah, I agree. It's time I retired that .sig. PLONK. Move .sig. For great justice. It's a Slashdot .signature line parody of a line from ZeroWing, aka

Re: .sig

At 1:08 PM -0800 3/4/03, Tim May quoted: If I'm going to reach out to the the Democrats then I need a third hand.There's no way I'm letting go of my wallet or my gun while they're around. --attribution uncertain, possibly Gunner, on Usenet But WAIT! *Which* gun should I hold on to? The Glock

Re: .sig

a crap...) -TD From: anonimo arancio [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: .sig Date: 5 Mar 2003 00:43:51 - On Tue, 4 Mar 2003 14:33:59 -0800, you wrote: At 1:08 PM -0800 3/4/03, Tim May quoted: If I'm going to reach out to the the Democrats then I need a third

.sig

At 1:08 PM -0800 3/4/03, Tim May quoted: If I'm going to reach out to the the Democrats then I need a third hand.There's no way I'm letting go of my wallet or my gun while they're around. --attribution uncertain, possibly Gunner, on Usenet Would the converse read? If I'm going to reach out to

Yes, I really did zeroize that key (good sig this time I think)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 (My PGP client botched the signature last time when I used the clipboard method. This time I'm using the plugin button and it should work. Stupid GUI crap.) I have devised what I believe to be a foolproof and completely portable way of setting